Another Papal Criminal Passes into History
The Truth About Francis and his Predecessors in Revolution
Copyright©2025 by Independent History and Research • www.revisionisthistory.org
To the Pharisees Jesus imparted a principle of the Revelation of the Method when He said: "If you were blind nobody could blame you, but as you say, 'We can see’ —your guilt remains." (John 9:40-41.)
It would be nice to be able join in the chorus of hosannas now being offered for Jorge Bergoglio (“Pope Francis”) across the spectrum of Left and Right — the “Pope of the poor” and so forth.
Alas, I can’t. The dossier of his crimes was presented in detail by scholars less than a year ago on St. Athanasius Day. It is a powerful antidote to the panegyrics flooding the airwaves and newsprint today.
This is mandatory reading:
“Call for the Resignation of Pope Francis”https://drive.google.com/file/d/1u1p7_d3tgspmrFz7ZaVCxCmgo-4Icwc_/view
There is a problem with the indictment however, and it is a familiar one, amnesia.
As far as“Call for the Resignation of Pope Francis” commendably proceeded in its documented particulars which demolish Francis’ undeserved reputation as a good pontiff, it commits the sin of omission.
For example, the dossier forgets the offenses against the gospel of Jesus Christ by Pope “Saint” John Paul II on whose watch a deluge of predations upon children unconscionably occurred, as well as his sinister promulgation of the occult prisca theologia of the Renaissance, which he revived at Assisi in 1986 in violation of the First Commandment.
Prisca theologia conquered the papal household in the early Renaissance and has never been eradicated. It emerged full-blown in the religious syncretism sponsored by John Paul II.
Those who imagine that Francis was some unprecedented anomaly launched like a meteor from Hades at the papacy and the Church, are doomed to be victimized by the next change-agent pontiff. This is the fatal flaw of the Right wing critique of Francis’ papacy.
An occult tradition commenced inside the Church in 1450 at the Council of Florence with the baptism of Pletho’s arcanum, which launched the Neoplatonic Hermetic theurgy into the Church. Pope Francis was traditional if know your revisionist ecclesiastical history in that he was the loyal son of a nearly 600-year-old occult patrimony. This is documented in The Occult Renaissance Church of Rome.
The Catholic Church of the authentic gospel tradition commenced in A.D. 33 and has nothing in common with the robber Church that began to arise during the Renaissance pontificates.
In my study, “Self-Sabotage by the Conservative Critics of Francis,” I track the connections between the revolutionary popes—‘Saint” Paul VI, “Saint” John Paul II Benedict XVI—and the Machiavellian change agency that flowed from the infiltration of the past six centuries.
In my introduction to that study I wrote:
“The …fatal weakness is the assumption of the orthodoxy of the revolutionary trio of change-agents and child molestation-facilitators who preceded Francis: Popes Benedict XVI, John Paul II and Paul VI. Their crimes and heresies are papered over…Moreover, the crucially important history of the Renaissance antecedents of the crisis in the Church seem to be unknown….”
WAS FRANCIS ASSASSINATED?
Pope John Paul I intended to reform the Vatican Bank. He was likely assassinated. Did the same fate befall the wicked Francis, who outlived his usefulness to the Cryptocracy? Had he resigned like Ratzinger (Benedict XVI) he might have been spared. His death on Easter Monday burnishes his aura of "sainthood."
A pillow over his face, perhaps? Never underestimate the criminality of the Vatican. It is said that Stalin was hastily dispatched by that means and perhaps Francis went to his eternal destiny in similar fashion. He egotistically intended on continuing to rule as a decrepit, corpulent, diminished 88-year old, which would have harmed the ecclesiastic crime syndicate’s ability to function at par.
Francis, the first Jesuit pope in history, detested Catholicism.
Almost anywhere Catholics were packing churches offering a traditional Latin Mass, or where schools were jammed with uniformed children who attended that Mass, and pilgrimages comprised of thousands of traditional young people, such as in Paris, were occurring, Francis and his minions banned, obstructed or harassed them. He imposed significant restrictions primarily through his 2021 “motu proprio” (on his own initiative”), titled, Traditionis Custodes, and in subsequent acts of tyrannical suppression.
Below is a summary of his key restrictions:
Requirement for Episcopal Approval:
Bishops must authorize celebrations of theLatin Mass in their dioceses, reversing Pope Benedict XVI’s 2007 policy (Summorum Pontificum), which allowed priests to celebrate the Latin Mass without needing such permission.
Bishops are required to consult the Vatican before granting permissions, particularly for priests ordained after July 16, 2021, who wish to celebrate the Mass.
Restrictions on Locations:
The venerable Mass was generally prohibited by the pope in regular parish churches unless no alternative location is available, and even then, it requires Vatican approval via the Dicastery for Divine Worship and the Discipline of the Sacraments.
Approved Mass groups must use alternate venues designated by the bishop, and these Masses cannot be listed in parish Mass schedules.
Limits on New Groups and Priests:
Bishops are prohibited from authorizing the formation of new Latin Mass groups within their dioceses.
Newly ordained priests must seek explicit permission from their bishop, who must first obtain permission from the Vatican, to celebrate the Latin rite.
Restrictions on Sacraments:
In December 2021, the Vatican clarified that certain sacraments, such as priestly ordinations and confirmations, cannot be celebrated according to the pre-Vatican II rite.
Vatican Oversight and Enforcement:
The Dicastery for Divine Worship, led by Commissar (“Cardinal”) Arthur Roche, has full authority to evaluate and approve requests for the old Mass, ensuring strict adherence to Traditionis Custodes.
In February 2023, Pope Francis reaffirmed that bishops cannot grant dispensations without his approval, addressing attempts by some bishops to circumvent the restrictions.
Francis was another coffin-riding pontiff taking what is supposed to be Christ's Church further down the tubes. The papacy since the Renaissance has been the Church's misfortune. (Cf. The Occult Renaissance Church of Rome).
Keep reading with a 7-day free trial
Subscribe to Michael Hoffman's Revelation of the Method to keep reading this post and get 7 days of free access to the full post archives.