History of Enslavement of Whites Part II: The Weasel Words that Conceal It

"Convicts. Felons. Indentured. Servants."

Copyright ©2025 by Independent History and Research

www.Revisionisthistory.org

PART II

(Part I is at this link)

Preface

I stifle my rage and suppress the fire of my indignation in the face of the facts of the enslavement and oppression of penurious whites that has been buried by the spiritual heirs of the slavers. The unconscionable misery and agony visited upon generations of white people at the hands of their own kinsmen is no better known now than when the poltroons and royals suffocated the press and owned the courts. May God permit me to be the instrument of making the infamy known to the world, and imprinting upon the collective consciousness of humanity crimes forever monstrous to behold.

—Michael Hoffman

“The Worthless Poor”

“O Poverty! thou art the unpardonable offense…Thou hast neither rights, charters, immunities nor liberties!”

—George Beaumont, Minister at Ebenezer Chapel, Norwich, England; The Warriors’ Looking Glass (Sheffield, 1808).

“In 1767…Arthur Young wrote an extended essay of advice to the English upper classes…Young was…concerned about the need to reduce expenditure on relief for the poor…All of those receiving relief should be housed in 100 Houses of Industry; their children would also be enclosed there, ‘for nine out of ten of the worthless poor were brought up by their parents in idleness and pilfering.”

—Jim Handy, Apostles of Inequality (University of Toronto, 2022), p. 3

Campania Foelix (“The Prosperous Land”), a manual for the subjugation and demonization of destitute English men and women by the British metaphysician Timothy Nourse, 1700

The common people of England were trash in the eyes of the influential philosopher and theologian Timothy Nourse. He declared that many among the English working class were:

“…very rough and savage in their dispositions, being of Leveling principles, and refractory to government, insolent, and tumultuous…the best way, therefore, will be to bridle them, and to make them feel the spur… Such men are to be looked upon as trashy weeds or nettles, growing usually upon dunghills…”

Course, Campania Foelix [1706 edition], pp. 15-16 and 273-274.

English children as young as five confined in London’s Tothill Fields Prison, 1850-1884

Gallows Fodder

These allegedly subhuman poor white people were fit only to be terrorized by “jailers and hangmen.”

Impoverished English children, no less than their parents and neighbors, were dehumanized by the ruling class. “Criminal” children as young as five were confined in London’s Tothill Fields prison, south of Westminster Abbey. The boys were typically sentenced to hard labor for “theft, begging or vagrancy.”

In England: “Between 1801 and 1835, 103 death-sentences were passed on children under the age of 14 for theft...” — Philip Horne, “Introduction” to Oliver Twist, or, The Parish Boy’s Progress (Penguin Books, 2003], pp. xv.

“In the year 1830 there had been an extraordinary 18,017 felony prosecutions under the capital (punishment) code…Two-thirds of the…hangings in the 1820s, as V.A. Gatrell’s horrifying The Hanging Tree: Execution and the English People, 1770–1868 reports, were for property crime, only one-fifth for murder.” (Ibid., Horne, pp. xv and xvi).

The legal theory justifying capital punishment for what were historically petty misdemeanors, was the judicial weapon of the ruling class. English criminal law in the early modern period was a system for terrorizing unpropertied Englishmen. Class interest was disguised as penal jurisprudence.

At the behest of the Right Honorable Charles Townshend and Lord Verney, owners of the English Linen Company, “In 1764 parliament decreed that the death penalty would apply to those who broke into buildings to steal or destroy linen, or the tools to make it.” Death penalty legislation was routinely added to protect the investments of capitalists.

An Act of 1713 punished with death any larceny of goods from an unoccupied house or establishment worth 40 shillings or more.” Cf. “An Act for the more effectual Preventing and Punishing of Robberies of Houses” (12 Anne, c. 7).

In 1769 Parliament made it a capital crime for the poor and hungry to besiege grain mills where locally grown food was held by wholesalers for sale and shipment to distant regions for a high price.

The Act of 1769 in its final form (George iii c. 29, 1769) included draconian punishment for interference in the seizure (“Enclosure”) by the wealthy of what had been for centuries the common grazing land of the English people, said interference being punishable by enslavement in the West Indies or British America.

“Convicts” and “Felons”

Don’t you see that the whole aim of Newspeak is to narrow the range of thought? In the end we shall make thought-crime literally impossible, because there will be no words in which to express it.” —George Orwell, 1984

Those who teach us to be stupid have left us with no words to express the kidnapping, chaining, whipping, starvation and murder of hundreds of thousands of white people who were enslaved in the western hemisphere. We are ordered to believe otherwise and close our eyes to the evidence. Those media-appointed experts who imagine they are our intellectual superiors insist that these Caucasians were everything other than slaves — the cosmetic terminology lexicon includes the words servants, indentured, convicts and felons.

The revisionist aspires to compile a pellucid dictionary of the chronicle of white enslavement, a pursuit undervalued by the human imbecility which considers the words “convict,” and “indentured,” and the rest of the cream puff euphemisms, a universal solvent for dissolving investigation into the conditions of white slaves who are dismissed as “felons” well-deserving of severe punishment; or whose agony is scoffed at as the whining of pampered “servants.”

Here’s a profile the majority of the dastardly “felons” and “convicts.” They were stealers of ten yards of lace, poachers of deer, fishermen trespassing in an aristocrat’s pond, and purloiners of a basket of peas or a bushel of pears. They were all guilty felons in the eyes of the hanging judges of seventeenth, eighteenth and early nineteenth century buccaneer capitalism. Twenty-first century “authorities on labor history” affiliated with American and British colleges and universities second the imposture. According to these high priests of correct think, the “convicts” undeniably deserved to be ripped from their families, suffering “transportation” to colonies thousands of miles distant (and after the American Revolution, to far-off Australia), and suffering bondage there.