Amalek in Light of the Secret Teaching of the Kabbalah

Benjamin Netanyahu: the Gilgul of Amalek

www.RevisionistHistory.org

Authors Note: This essay may strain the patience of those seeking quickie “bites of info.” I aspire to write for those in search of knowledge born of sustained reflection and study. For so complex a subject as the Kabbalah, anything less than providing sufficient background as stepping stones to an esoteric destination which might otherwise seriously perplex and astound, would compound the misunderstanding and misdirection which too often proliferates online. Our objective is the advancement of knowledge, not click bait. There are no shortcuts.

“You must remember what Amalek has done to you says our Holy Bible, and we do remember and we are fighting. Our brave troops and combatants who are now in Gaza or around Gaza and in all other regions in Israel are joining this chain of Jewish heroes, a chain that started 3,000 years ago—from Joshua to the heroes of 1948—the Six Day War, the 1973 October war—and all other wars of this country—are hero troops. They have one supreme main goal, to completely defeat the murderous enemy and to guarantee our existence in this country.”

—Israeli Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu, October 28, 2023

This exposition builds on our study, “The Disaster of Israeli Zionism: The Cryptocracy’s Covert Stratagem for the Destruction of the Jewish People,” which was published two months ago.

Here we are examining a civil war inside the Judaic ethnicity while learning what we can about the two manifestations, Zionism and Talmudism, as they clash in deadly earnest and meet at the apex point of the Kabbalah’s esoteric explication of the identity of Amalek.

Zionism originally was ostensibly a revolt against traditional “ghetto” Judaism. The problem for such a supposed revolt however, was the fact that Zionism could not escape the non-negotiable, fundamental tenet of Orthodox Judaism: self-worship — in the case of the Zionist entity, the so-called “state of Israel”which is its own messiah. Religious Judaics of the rigid Hasidic sects are deeply troubled by what they believe to be “false messianism.” The Zionists in turn consider the non-Zionist Hasidism as threats to their entity’s claims to being the “Jewish state.” The self-worship practiced by the Orthodox Judaics which leads them to assert that they are the only “true Jews” necessarily excludes the political nation that appropriated the name of “Israel.”

“To seek freedom from the yoke of exile is as pernicious as to seek freedom from the yoke of the Torah”

Zionism is a movement supported from its inception by some Protestants who have declared that because the Israelis gained a state, “the Jews are no longer in exile.” This is supposed to be a Biblical miracle that heralds the End Times and the Second Coming. The farcical aspect of this masquerade is ignored by the American media Right and Left who are united in producing reports about counterfeit-Israel that are nearly all works of historical concealment. Meanwhile, the followers of the Talmud and Kabbalah, known as “Orthodox Jews” who are in the non-Zionist camp, proclaim that “Exile is...a divine decree visited upon the Jews as punishment for their transgressions against the Torah” (Yakov M. Rabkin, What Is Modern Israel? [2016], p. 126).

This is an expression with which no traditional Christian would disagree. Certain Talmudists have detected, since the end of the 19th century, the forced and contrived nature of this Zionist “Israel” which is a counterfeited Biblical identity. “For them, the land of Israel has no absolute value detached from the Torah. For the fifth Lubavitch Rebbe (Rabbi), Shalom Dov Baer Schneerson (1860-1920), to seek freedom from the yoke of exile is as pernicious as to seek freedom from the yoke of the Torah” (Rabkin, p. 133).

Zionism: A disastrous anti-Jewish snare fomented by Aryan Freemasonry and Protestant Dispensationalism

The Zionist narrative holds that the “state of Israel” is the springboard to a new birth of freedom, power and dominion for “Jews” around the world. Both Aryan Freemasonry and Aryan Protestant Dispensationalism have encouraged the Israelis to accept this view, which is, according to the most astute of the Talmudic and Kabbalistic Orthodox rabbis, a disastrous anti-Jewish illusion formulated by the English Protestant John Nelson Darby (1801-1882), and later systematized in the Scofield Reference Bible. The majority of the “evangelical” churches in America are dispensationalist.

In the perspective of these rabbis, “...the tragedy in Europe (the Holocaust) was merely the beginning of a long process that the existence of the state of Israel continues to aggravate. In their view, all of the achievements of the Zionist enterprise will be annihilated...To concentrate millions of Jews in such a dangerous place, according to this way of thinking, borders on suicidal folly” (Rabkin, p. 14). Rabkin cites “the keenly felt premonition that the Zionist revolt will one day bring a terrible punishment” (Rabkin, p. 19, italics added).

Despite the public relations wizardry of New York and Hollywood employed in enveloping the Israeli state in a haze of democratic virtue and liberal ideals, the fundamental and unmistakable component of the Israeli enterprise is racism and dispossession of the native Arab population, a process known and heartily detested on the Left as “settler colonialism.”

The close identification of the Judaic people of the world with so-called Israel’s racist criminal acts is highly injurious to Jews. The mass murder of thousands of helpless, blameless children in Gaza has been perpetrated in the name of “The Jewish state.” The circumstances that led to this destructive and unjust branding were deliberately contrived by western occultism’s Jew-haters.

This is a fact I endeavored to document in Adolf Hitler: Enemy of the German People. Is there anyone who continues to believe it is only a “coincidence” that had Hitler’s Third Reich never come to power there would have been no “Israel” founded in 1948?

Permission for the killing of Palestinian children is promulgated as dogma by two Zionist-Talmudists in their heinous, 2009 Israeli murder manual, Torat Ha-Melekh (sometimes spelled Torat Hamelech), which was written by Yitzhak Shapira, the Rosh yeshiva (Dean) of the Od Yosef Chai yeshiva in the West Bank settlement of Yitzhar, in collaboration with Yosef Elitzur.

Torat Ha-Melekh has been distributed to the Israeli military. It teaches that it is a religious duty to kill non-Jewish infants on the enemy side during warfare, “if there is a good chance they will grow up to be like their evil parents.” Other reasons the Israeli authors furnish for the permission to kill non-Jewish children include if they “block the rescue of Jews...Little children are often situated in this way...it is permitted to kill them because their very presence facilitates the killing (of Jews)...(p. 215). “It is also permitted to kill the children of the leader (of the enemy) in order to put pressure on him...” (p. 215).

In the course of reading Torat Ha-Melekh the alibis and doublespeak of the US media and Right-wing spin-maestros such as Victor Davis Hanson and Ben Shapiro, go up in the smoke of the bombs and  dust of the rubble of Gaza, beneath which the bodies of the wretched of the earth occupy a mass grave marked, “childhood in Palestine.”

Before anyone suggests that Torat Ha-Melekh is a marginal book by fringe authors ostracized in Israel society, we should recall that the current director of the national Israeli police forces, the genocidal maniac Itamar Ben-Gvir, for years honored the memory of Baruch Goldstein, the mass murderer of 40 Palestinian civilians, by creating a shrine to Goldstein in Ben-Gvir’s home. The 10,000 children murdered in Gaza since October, are mute testimony to the efficacy of Torat Ha-Melekh and the Tzaddik (saint) Goldstein.

Beneath the western media’s propaganda-fog is the reality of the racism central to the creation of the Israeli state. Lord Balfour, the English statesman whose “Declaration” led to the charter for the Israeli theft of Palestinian land, wrote in 1919, “...in Palestine we do not propose even to go through the form of consulting the wishes of the present inhabitants of the country (Palestine). The Four Great Powers are committed to Zionism. And Zionism...is...of far greater import than the desires and prejudices of the 700,000 Arabs who now inhabit that ancient land” (Regina Sharif, Non-Jewish Zionism: Its Roots in Western History [1986], p. 74).

To what extent is Zionism a movement co-designed by Aryan occultists as a way of trapping “Jews” and seriously diminishing them, while avoiding responsibility for the consequences of the forthcoming catastrophe by employing plausible denial?

One of the failures of the percipients of our revisionist history is the manner in which they are so very quick to generalize. The tendency toward generalization is almost automatic in some persons. Their boredom with details and making distinctions is patent. This rush to pre-judgment has led to these erroneous beliefs:

Because Talmudism is iniquitous it must be synonymous with Zionism in almost all respects. A Zionist is a product of Talmudic mentality. Talmudists are all afflicted with Holocaust monomania and implicated in the murder of Palestinians and other gentiles.

This sloppy “thinking” (if it even deserves the name), is analogous to the statement that because all Amish are Christians they are followers of the pope and uphold the inquisition. We laugh at the conflation of the Amish with Rome because we know it is based on rank ignorance of the two groups within Christianity. Something equally ignorant is at work when we conflate Zionism with Talmudism.

It is true that the Israeli state with its massive resources has seduced the majority of the Orthodox followers of the Babylonian Talmud, and one can say the same about Catholics seduced by the legacy of the Renaissance papacy, with its glorious art works and heroic campaigns against would-be invaders of Europe in decisive battles such as Lepanto. The Catholicism of fourteen hundred years was derogated and eclipsed by the popes of the Renaissance and their successors up to the present time, yet ninety-nine percent of the Catholics of the present century have not a glimmer of the history of this revolutionary devolution.

The Zionism of counterfeit-Israel is a revolutionary departure from non-negotiable tenets of the Babylonian Talmud

The creation and maintenance of counterfeit-Israel is a revolutionary departure from non-negotiable tenets of the Babylonian Talmud, yet this fact is no more discerned by the Orthodox Judaics who support the Israeli state than by the conservative Catholics who made the Polish change agent and child-molestation facilitator Wojtyla “Pope Saint John Paul the Great.”

That there are Talmudic elements to Zionism is undeniable. There are Roman Catholic elements in the pontificates of the post-Second Vatican Council Popes. Where a theology has wholly encompassed a people, whether Catholic or Judaic, a residue will continue to resonate long after the core doctrines have been abandoned.

There is the additional circumstance of Talmudic attitudes evinced by secular or non-conforming Judaics outside the control of the rabbinic councils, as for example Judaic-Bolsheviks in the U.S.S.R. who weaponized the egotism which is intrinsic to the Babylonian Talmud and its successor halachic (legal) texts.

There is also the pitfall of ascribing to Orthodox Judaism a monolithic ideology consistently inimical to the Israeli state. The religion is subject to a surfeit of variables, including significant differences between Sephardic and Ashkenazi, and Hasidic and non-Hasidic (Mithnagdim) Orthodox Judaism.

The Israeli Death Cult

“Orthodox Judaism” as it arose with the Baal Shem Tov in eastern Europe in the eighteenth century came to be known as Hasidic (or “Haredi” Judaism), incorporating many aspects of the Pharisaic Judaism of the first century and profoundly stamped by allegiance to the texts of the Kabbalah, principally the books that comprise the Zohar.

Even within this realm there are major differences, as for example the Chabad-Lubavitch brand, once anti-Zionist and now largely supportive of the Israeli state. With these caveats in mind, it can nevertheless be said that there is a consensus, once dominant for centuries and at present a small minority, representative of a survival strategy that sees in the Israeli state a catastrophe in the making for “Jews.”

The nation originally was born in a Left wing milieu of socialism that saw “Israel” as a means for normalizing “Jews” and bringing them into the modern family of nations, albeit as first among quasi-equals. Israeli founding father David Ben-Gurion and the other pioneers in the mainstream of the Zionist movement viewed the Israeli nation-state as a vehicle for bringing “Jews” into synchronicity with modernity, in a future redeemed by the very existence of the newly founded “Israel.” The sackcloth and ashes morbidity of traditional Talmudism was dismissed as a fixture of a shetl (ghetto) mentality.

According to Rabbi Yaakov Shapiro (not to be confused with Shapira): “In fact, in the 1950s, the holocaust was downplayed in Israel. The New Hebrew Man was basically ashamed of the entire episode...Holocaust survivors were not honored but disdained by the Zionists. For example, the Zionists would refer to Holocaust survivors by the nickname ‘sabon,’ which means ‘coward,’ but also ‘soap.” (The Empty Wagon: Zionism’s Journey from Identity Crisis to Identity Theft [Bais Medrash Society, 2018], p. 1179. “Soap” as in the bars of soap of which it was said the Nazis manufactured from “Jewish fat,”is a rumor now largely discredited by Jewish historians themselves).

This situation began to change in the late 1960s. In 1977 Ben-Gurion’s political party, the Labor Zionists, were voted out of office in favor of the former terrorist guerrilla fighters of groups such as the Irgun, perpetrators of the Deir Yassin massacre of Palestinians, and the Stern Gang that assassinated Swedish peace negotiator Count Folke-Benadotte.

The Irgun mastermind Menachem Begin of the Likud party became Prime Minister and the suffering experienced in World War II became the raison d’etre of the Israeli regime. The spectre of “another Holocaust” and the suspicion that new Hitlers lurked throughout the world, took center stage. The Palestinians were another Hitler; so too Arabs in general —and don’t forget the Iranians. In the Israeli state, beginning with Begin, the Holocaust became the defining sigil of Judaic history. To latter-day Zionism, the only force standing between “Jews” and even bigger and more lethal gas chambers was “the state of Israel.” Rabbi Shapiro:

“...a new, powerful idol was added to the Zionist pantheon: the holocaust god...the holocaust god replaced the Labor party’s tilling-the-soil-land-god as the dominant Zionist idol...Previously, Zionism meant the Jews would become normal people and would consequently be loved by the goyim. In the holocaust god version, Zionism means that the Jews become powerful people and are now able to fight the goyim.”

In Rabbi Shapiro’s indispensable book The Empty Wagon, he evokes an insight of world-historical signficance:

“...According to Theodore Herzl, the definition of a Jew is someone the anti-Semites hate. To wit, if there were no anti-Semites, there would be no Jews. The more anti-Semites there are, and the more they hate us, the stronger the Jewish identity becomes.” (Shapiro, pp. 1176-1177).

Israeli doomsday theology is not of the Babylonian Talmud. The Israeli “Masada complex” is not of the Talmud. These are fixtures of Dispensationalist Protestantism and Aryan Freemasonry foisted on Judaic people in tandem with the Israeli Zionist ideology.

Zionist Sicarii and the suicide cult of Masada

Throughout the United States these particular Protestants donate millions of dollar annually to the Zionist killers of the Palestinians. Zionists are equivalent to the Zealots in the time of Jesus for whom there is zero Scriptural support. “Israeli settlers” on the receiving end of the financial largesse of American fundamental Protestants, are the most fanatical of the Zionist Zealots. These settlers are a revival of the ancient Sicarii— denounced in the Babylonian Talmud (BT Gittin 56) as the Baryonim —warmongers who recklessly instigated combat with the Romans to the detriment of the Jews whose lives they jeopardized.

Many readers will be familiar with the Zionist-Israeli identification with Masada, which is so pathological it is known by the psychiatric term, “complex” as in the “Masada complex.” This obsession was conceded by Israeli Prime Minister Golda Meir in her 1971 conversation with American journalist Stewart Alsop: “Mr. Alsop, you say that we have a Masada complex. It is true. We do have a Masada complex.”

Masada is a synonym for mass suicide. The ancient site of Masada is among the most popular of Israeli tourist destinations. The Israelis have turned it into a shrine to suicide. At one time Israeli soldiers swore their enlistment oath at Masada. It was on that site that some 1,000 Sicarii killed themselves in the first century A.D. This pathological psychology has been incorporated into the national Israeli psyche.

In addition to their notorious mass suicide, the Sicarii were known for killing fellow Jews who refused to cooperate with them. What sincere “friend of the Jews” among the Christians would encourage such darkness— the emulation of the Zealots and Sicarii, and the enshrinement in the national psyche of a place of mass suicide?

The Masada cult contravenes millennia of rabbinic teaching. Classic Talmudic doctrine abhorred such behavior and attitudes. They were too shrewd to be sucked into the Freudian farrago which the Israeli entity has mounted.

In its inner doctrine the Zohar taught knowledge that was once secret and is now commonplace: negative projections and anticipations about people are self-fulfilling. Given their “dark, doomsday type of idolatry” and their identity as he-who-is hated by the goyim, the Israeli nation is steeped in mass psychosis needing and feeding upon scenarios of pending extermination should “Israel” fail to maintain its nuclear weapons monopoly and other military dominance in the Middle East.

The US Congress, White House, evangelical Right wing and liberal Democratic party Left wing all subscribe to this blackmail. This includes the majority of Orthodox Judaic persons who have been, over the past seventy years, gradually seduced into succumbing to the ceaseless Israeli and ADL-manufactured hysteria and alarm over a supposed permanent state of war existing between goyim and Jews.

“Hisgarus ba’umos”

Historian and non-Zionist Orthodox Rabbi Yaakov Shapiro, who is related by marriage to the non-Zionist Grand Rabbi of Satmar Hasidim, writes as follows:

“Religious Zionists undergird the…Masada complex by constantly reminding us that Esav sonei l’Yaakov (Esau hates Jacob) and interpreting that to mean that no matter what we do, the goyim will always try to kill us.

“Consequently, (it is alleged that) antagonistic attitudes of gentiles toward Jews are never due to provocation on the part of the Zionists or geopolitical rivalry, but rather to the nature of all goyim to always want to kill Jews. This (fallacy), like the secular Zionist holocaust mentality, allows Israel and Zionism to dodge any culpability for hisgarus ba’umos (“needlessly antagonizing the goyim”), and ignoring opportunities to make peace rather than war.” (Shapiro, p. 1188).

Rabbi Shapiro highlights the Kabbalistic survival mechanism which served the ancient rabbinic community through millennia of interaction with powerful non-Judaic nations. Many readers will be surprised, perhaps even shocked by his advocacy of a submissive, humble posture. But to say that it is his alone would be a historical error of considerable magnitude.

This was the classic rabbinic position for many hundreds of years and it is how they survived and negotiated a militant, muscular, medieval Catholicism. First came an acknowledgement, predicated on esoteric Judaic lore, of what might be termed the law of karma, “You reap what you sow” (Galatians 6:7), an inescapable law of reward or retribution (s’char v’onesh) dependent on the individual actions of a “Jew.” Second and perhaps even more remarkable is the traditional rabbinic view somewhat consonant with traditional Catholic dogma, that Jews are rightfully in a state of punishment and exile:

“The correct approach is to know that anti-Semitic attacks are the result of s’char v’onesh. The goyim are the ‘rod of Hashem (God’s) wrath.’ And thus, the Zionist approach of fighting is not only contrary to the Torah, it is suicidal.” (Rabbi Shapiro, p. 1186).

Shapiro is not writing for an audience of non-Jews. His book was authored for a Judaic readership. Therefore, it is not public relations propaganda aimed at non-Jews. It is an attempt to recover and revive the survival strategy of generations of canny rabbis based on a Christian theological truth now overwhelmingly denied: “The goyim are the ‘rod of Hashem’s wrath.”

The Zionists on the other hand, believe they have broken free of the cycle of s’char v’onesh —a delusion which the Aryan Freemasons have induced. Moreover, the “evangelicals” under Darby were taught to expect that the end of the Jewish Exile was at hand. When “Israel” was founded in 1948 Darbyite “Dispenatonalists” looked in their Scofield Reference Bibles and interpreted it to mean that an Old Testament-faithful “Jewish state” had been founded in the “Holy Land” in fulfillment of the eschatological prophecy of Scripture.

The concept of a shmad (apostate) Israel that has counterfeited the name has not occurred to the Protestant “evangelicals,” though it has occurred to hundreds of thousands of Hasidic Judaics throughout the world who are seemingly more astute than the denizens of Churchianity. The Holocaust and the martial “state of Israel” are the deities of the Zionists. They have no other God before them. They have reversed the first commandment of the Decalogue. Even their self-worship is sublimated to the “Jewish state” which has become their savior and redeemer; their (and the world’s) moshiach (Messiah).

At this juncture the reader may wonder, if this apparently humble approach is what was in place in pre-Zionist Talmudic and Kabbalistic Judaism, how did the rabbis and their followers gain so much power as indispensable advisers to royalty and financiers? The genius of Judaism before the Zionist era was almost Taoist in its belief that Jews do not survive by using the same tactics as the gentile nations.

Zionist “Israel” on the other hand has made the mistake of aspiring to be a super-goy nation, surpassing the goyim in military prowess and battlefield ingenuity. White Protestant fundamentalists from the southern and midwestern United States are working side-by-side with the Israeli settlers, thereby encouraging their ongoing land theft and oppression of the Palestinians. In other words, encouraging them to behave like any previous colonial power has behaved, whether in Africa, India or China. If there are any people more immersed in “anti-Semitic” Jew-hate than the evangelical Protestants at work assisting the growth of the Zionist empire, we haven’t encountered them.

Anyone with even a passing interest in the welfare of Judaic people would shudder in horror at the brutality and dispossession visited upon the Palestinians in the name of “the Jewish state.” The world’s most egregious Jew-hater could not have conceived of a more effectively stigmatizing trap than this branding.

The masonic West that supports this snare is demographically going the way of the Dodo. The latter half of the 21st century will belong to the masses of the “Third World” in countries like India, Pakistan, Indonesia, Egypt and sub-Saharan Africa, where today half the population is under the age of 30. These people have little or no empathy for “Israel,” Zionism or the Holocaust industry critiqued by Norman Finkelstein in his eponymous book. It is the Zionists’ low regard for the exploding populations of these nations which sustain Israeli pipe dreams about relegating these future billions of alienated youth to passive subordination, or processing them into America-style golem actively engaged in working, paying and fighting for Zionist imperium.

Thus far we have contrasted Orthodox Judaism of the pre-Zionist era with Israeli ideology. It is necessary to state that even this non-Zionist Talmudism remains the enemy of Christian civilization, a tragic fact we have documented in two books and several issues of our Revisionist History® newsletter.

Non-Zionist Talmudism employs stealth, psychological warfare and goy surrogates to achieve the goals of the first century Pharisees who established the groundwork for launching the Talmud into canonical status. We cannot lay the blame for the decline and decay of Christianity completely, or even mostly at the door of the rabbis however, as the Jew-haters are wont to do with their reckless tendency to believe whatever they want to believe (confirmation bias), in contrast to the prudential researcher who accumulates all the data he can and then follows it to wherever it leads.

The Talmudists and Kabbalists gained dominion over the Catholic Church, the American, British and European governments, college and university professors, the New York media and Hollywood through the cooperation of non-Judaic co-conspirators who are often omitted or downplayed by Right-wing Jew-haters. We devoted some 723 pages in The Occult Renaissance Church of Rome to tracing for the first time ever the involvement of the pre-20th century popes in advancing the Kabbalistic gnosis within the Vatican hierarchy.

At a time when Judaics were nearly completely at the mercy of Rome, the occupants of the papacy allowed themselves to be seduced into assisting the Kabbalistic gnosis to power and influence, beginning in Florence in the middle of the fifteenth century. Those who will not read The Occult Renaissance Church of Rome cannot obtain a true picture of the massive extent to which gentiles have served as co-conspirators in the subversion of Christianity.

How have the Israelis interfered with this process? By breaking with the cunning of their erstwhile Kabbalistic past, which managed to cement one image above all other images in the minds of the non-Jews: that “Jews” everywhere and always have been victims of persecution; never perpetrators.

In a Third World not controlled by Steven Spielberg’s dream factory, the image the Israelis have projected is very different. It has substituted for the public relations picture of the Jacob-like peaceful scapegoat, the warrior-like violent Esau. More than any other Israeli departure from traditional Judaism, it is this one factor that has excited in the non-Zionist Talmudists the greatest degree of fury and enmity, given that they believe Israeli aggression and oppression are building ever-increasing, deadly resentment for “Jews” throughout the world and blowing their sympathy-inducing image as the “eternally persecuted.”

A Journey to the Depths of the Kabbalistic Gnosis