Discover more from Michael Hoffman's Revelation of the Method
The Disaster of Israeli Zionism: The Cryptocracy’s Covert Stratagem for the Destruction of the Jewish People
THE SECRET INIQUITY OF ARYAN OCCULTISM
"History will be kind to me for I intend to write it.”
Michael Hoffman's Revelation of the Method is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.
Retaliatory Terror Bombing for Peace and Justice: The World War Two Allied Doctrine in 2023
The former British Prime Minister kept his promise, penning a million words over the course of the six volumes of his History of the Second World War. In that prolix deluge the gas chambers are not mentioned. The fact that Churchill was instrumental in the collective punishment of the German people via the incineration of more than 600,000 civilians is also omitted.
His cult is as fresh as a daisy in our time because he was that rare and precious commodity: an architect and apologist for the doctrine of killing the innocent as “retaliation” for the sins of rulers who commit crimes in their name, otherwise known as collective punishment, i.e. The Allied Doctrine of World War II.
Despite 78 years having elapsed since the end of that conflict, the Allied governments and the morality of their ideology of collective punishment are as sacred and inviolable as they were in 1945.
Churchill espoused air force terror bombing as a “form of control over semi-civilized countries which will be found very effective and infinitely cheaper” than infantry attacks (Ronald Hyam, Understanding the British Empire , p. 236). Moreover, his avidity for cremating ancient Saxon cities packed with German women and children has been no obstacle to his “great statesman” status in the West.
Churchill’s “…Bomber Command set the goal of destroying 104 German cities and towns, from the metropolis of Berlin to sleepy Wittenberg. The result, their experts estimated, would be 900,000 civilians dead, one million injured and 25 million left homeless. This extraordinary campaign of ultramodern violence began in 1942 with attacks on Cologne, Lübeck and Rostock. In the autumn of 1943 the RAF was joined by the U.S. Army Air Force….the Americans soon found themselves in the business of obliterating entire cities.…the devastation wrought by the bombers was unprecedented…” (Adam Tooze, “To Break an Enemy’s Will,” Wall Street Journal, February 15, 2014, p. C5).
“There is one thing that will bring Hitler down, and that is an absolutely devastating attack by very heavy bombers from this country upon the Nazi homeland.”
—Churchill to Lord Beaverbrook, July 8, 1940 [Churchill papers, 20/13] from The Churchill Documents, vol. 15, “Never Surrender,” May 1940-December 1940, pp. 492-92). Italics supplied.
In 1944 U.S. President Franklin D. Roosevelt partnered with Churchill’s terror-bombing crusade by criminalizing every man, woman and child in Germany:
“The German people must have it driven home to them that the whole nation has been engaged in a lawless conspiracy against the decencies of modern civilization.”
— Memorandum of President Franklin D. Roosevelt to the Secretary of War, Washington, August 26, 1944).
“Toward the end of the war in Europe, the United States showed ‘an increased interest in attacks directed specifically at the German people.” (Lee Kennett, A History of Strategic Bombing . and The Humanist, July-August 2005].
In the Pacific theater Roosevelt ordered General Curtis Lemay to implement LeMay's plan of attack on civilians in Japan. On March 9, 1945, 346 American bombers were dispatched to intentionally create a firestorm that would wipe out 16 square miles of the city of Tokyo, burning alive at least 100,000 Japanese children, women and men. The U.S. government’s own Strategic Bombing Survey, made the following world-historic admission, now forgotten: “Probably more persons lost their lives by fire at Tokyo in a 6-hour period than any time in the history of man.”
For his final act of arson, in February 1945 Churchill tossed a match into the cosmopolitan jewel that was the city of Dresden as casually as a drooling meth addict would torch an apartment building for revenge on the landlord who had evicted him.
These are the famous victories of the Allies, and more were to come: the bombing of Iraq and Afghanistan under George W. Bush, the Israeli terror bombing of Beirut throughout the summer of 1982, culminating in August in the burning of schools, hospitals and apartment blocks. Next up was the Israeli bombing of Gaza 2008-2009, yet again in 2014, and now this month.
From Tokyo to Dresden, from Beirut ‘82 to Gaza ’09 and ‘14, those war crimes have been consigned to the lowest region of the Memory Hole. For the denizens of the United States of Amnesia, for whom recalling the identity of who’s buried in Grant’s Tomb is a tall order, mass murder committed by “The Allies,” doesn’t register. Arab terrorists — now there’s a meme they can wrap their heads around.
It may be necessary to think of revisionist history as an antidote to the coercive artifice of our media-saturated universe, wherein Andrew Roberts, Churchill’s hagiographer, along with the sad wreck of a man by the name of General David Petraeus, late of Afghanistan, the CIA and his mistress’s boudoir—to whom he surrendered the top secrets of the US government in exchange for her charms—condescend to explain to the rubes the extraordinary nobility of the Israeli military. In the Wall Street Journal of October 14 (p. C4), in the midst of the Israeli slaughter of hundreds of children in Gaza and the deliberate bombing of hospitals and apartment blocks, these macabre comedians wrote:
“Sending ground forces into Gaza…as Israel has every right to do, will inevitably result in substantial Palestinian civilian casualties…But however enormous the challenge, Israel must maintain its long-standing commitment to its ethical code of the ‘purity of arms’…
“Moreover, as major urban combat operations begin, the residents of Gaza—and the West Bank too—need and deserve a way forward. They must be told not only what Israel’s military objectives are but what sort of future they and their children can expect after the war. As the U.S. was reminded in the wake of capturing Baghdad and toppling the regime of Saddam Hussein, considerable thought and planning need to be devoted to the post-conflict phase…”
Israelis have “every right” to kill Palestinian civilians, and after they “inevitably” do so as a result of their “purity of arms,” the good-hearted Petraeus and Roberts solicit concern for the future of the survivors of the massacre. They conclude their clueless “expert viewpoint” by citing Mr. Bush’s Iraq war as a model of how the Israelis should comport themselves, given that “considerable thought and planning” was “devoted to the post-conflict phase of the “capture” of the city of Baghdad.
Our most sardonic grin is reserved for their allusion to the Israeli military’s “purity of arms,” This is Orwellian hype from the Ministry of Truth in Jerusalem, fed like pabulum to doofuses in the media, along with that other tissue of absurdity, the Israeli killers in uniform hailed as “the most moral army in the world.” Is there anyone above the age of five who believes this? Yes, kindergarten is still in session in the U.S., where deceit is laughably diaphanous.
Among religious Judaic troops serving in the Israeli army, the Zionist-rabbinic law (“halacha”) they follow, imputes an inherent moral turpitude to non-Jews and classes them as innately malevolent. Goyim are detested in part because it is taught that they are congenitally predisposed to commit murder: “A Jew should not be alone with a goy, because the goy is suspect to commit homicide.” (Kitzur Shulchan Aruch 168:17).
One of the earliest laws distinguishing between Jews and gentiles is found in the Talmud Bavli, in Sanhedrin 57a: “Regarding bloodshed, the following distinction applies, if a non-Jew killed another non-Jew, or a non-Jew killed a Jew, the killer is liable for execution; if a Jew killed a non-Jew, he is exempt from punishment.”
(Much of this hostility is ingrained in Zionist-Talmudic youth under the heading of Esav sonei l’Yaakov, a doctrine too involved to mention only in passing here. For an excursus see Judaism Discovered [pp. 62-63; 463-467; 824]).
The Missouri-born Rabbi Yitzchak Ginsburgh is considered one of the Zionist Chabad-Lubavitch’s leading theological authorities. He is a celebrated educator and influencer in the U.S. and the Israeli state. Mr. Ginsburgh is the author of Baruch Hagever, a book praising the example of mass murderer Baruch Goldstein, who massacred 40 Palestinians as they prayed in a mosque in Hebron on Purim, February 1994. In Baruch Hagever the rabbi termed the slaughter, “…an act of bravery whose source was divine grace.”
Baruch Hagever is a summary provided by one of Ginsburgh’s students, of a class Ginsburgh taught in 1994 during which he identified “positive aspects” of Goldstein’s massacre of Muslim worshippers at the Cave of the Patriarchs mosque as: “The sanctification of the name of God…The life of Israel is worth more than the life of the goy and even if the goy does not intend to hurt Israel, it is permissible to hurt him in order to save Israel.”
In 1989 a mob of Zionists led by Rabbi Ginsburgh rampaged through a village in the West Bank region of Palestine, engaging in arson and murdering a 13-year-old Palestinian girl. A Talmud (“yeshiva”) student was arrested and put on trial in an Israeli court. Ginsburgh spoke for the defense, pointing out the lower value of the life of the Palestinian child:
“The people of Israel must rise and declare in public that a Jew and goy are not, God forbid, the same. Any trial that assumes that Jews and goyim are equal is a travesty of justice.”
In March, 1996 Rabbi Ginsburgh delivered a Purim lecture claiming to quote Chabad-Lubavitch Grand Rabbi Schneerson on the subject of “the mitzvahs of war for the sake of revenge and war for the sake of conquering the Land of Israel.” According to Rabbi Ginsburgh, Grand Rabbi Schneerson taught “that war for the sake of revenge was a much higher mitzvah” (blessed act). (Cf. Lawrence Cohler, “Hero or Racist? Are Jewish lives really more valuable than non-Jewish ones?” The Jewish Week, April 26, 1996, pp. 12 and 31).
Yitzchak Ginsburg was a 2019 recipient of an award from the Israeli Ministry of Education honoring him for his “Torah wisdom.” Ginsburgh’s teachings have incited a new generation of Israeli murderers who rely upon his Zionist-Talmudic theology to justify the killing of Arabs.
This homicidal rabbinic theology is expounded at length in a textbook co-authored in 2009 by the Rosh yeshiva (Dean) of Ginsburgh’s seminary, Od Yosef Chai in the West Bank settlement of Yitzhar. It is titled Torat Ha-Melekh: Berure Halakha Be’-inyene Malkhut U-Milhamot (“The King’s Torah: Halakhic Clarifications Regarding Matters of Kingdom and Wars”).
The title has been abbreviated as Torat Ha-Melekh. It was written by Rabbi Yitzhak Shapira in collaboration with Rabbi Yosef Elitzur. It explicitly claims that the life of a Jew is worth more than the life of a non-Jew, and permits the killing of innocent non-Jews, including children. One section of Torat Ha-Melekh teaches that it is permitted to kill non-Jewish infants on the enemy side during warfare “if there is a good chance they will grow up to be like their evil parents.”
Other reasons the rabbis furnish for the permission to kill non-Jewish children include if they “block the rescue of Jews...Little children are often situated in this way...it is permitted to kill them because their very presence facilitates the killing (of Jews)...(p. 215).
“It is also permitted to kill the children of the leader (of the enemy) in order to put pressure on him...” (p. 215).
In another instance, Rabbis Shapira and Elitzur write, “Every citizen of our kingdom who opposes us and who encourages [our enemies’] fighters, or expresses satisfaction with their deeds, is considered an assailant and may be killed….”
On p. 185 the Zionist authors state that whoever uses freedom of speech to weaken the Jews is considered to be a rodef and can be killed.
In chapter four of Torat Ha-Melekh, Shapira and Elitzur state that “It is permitted (to) exploit the presence of innocent young children (and harm them) in order to harm their parents” (p. 199).
The Zionist authors tell us, “There is a svara (a compelling reason founded on intuition), for hurting young, non-Jewish children if it is clear that they will grow up to harm us, and in such cases, we should aim our destruction specifically towards them. Young children will benefit from this killing since they would have grown up in an unrepaired way (be-tzurah lo metukenet), that would require their killing anyway. Therefore, it would be better to kill them now” (pp. 205-207).
The last chapter of this heinous murder manual urges the employment of merciless vengeance against gentiles (pp. 217-224). Torat Ha-Melekh concludes with an indirect call for vigilante killings of Palestinians, many of which have occurred since the volume appeared, to little publicity in the West, such as the burning to death in 2015 of a Palestinian baby, Ali Dawabsheh, and his mother and father, by a youthful Zionist-Talmudist, Amiram Ben Uliel. Two dozen Orthodox rabbis signed an open letter calling on the government to free Amiram Ben Uliel. The adult son of Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, Yair Netanyahu, has raised money for the child-killer’s legal costs.
Furthermore Zionist Rabbis Shapira and Elitzur declare that individual Jews can make the decision to kill goyim extra-judicially: “One does not need a decision by the nation to permit the spilling of blood...sometimes one must commit ruthless acts that are designed to create the correct element of fear.” (End quote from Torat Ha-Melekh). In addition to Rabbi Yitzchak Ginsburgh, prominent Zionist-rabbis Dov Lior and Ya’acov Yosef gave Torat Ha-Melekh their blessing to the book, while other members of the Israeli rabbinate condemned it, largely motivated by the fact that it revealed too much and was bad publicity for their cause.
Torat Ha-Melekh is studied by Israeli military and police forces. Many Israeli settlers are imbued with this theology and form the most zealous elements of the Israeli army and air force.
It should be understood that at least some Israelis strongly disagree with the doctrine imparted in Torat Ha-Melekh and we surmise that many Jews outside of the Israeli state would oppose it as well if they knew of it. Shapira and Elitzur are the product of a unique concatenation of forces centered on the weaponization of the Talmud by Zionism.
Orthodox rabbis prior to the rise of Zionism in the 19th century believed and taught that few if any of the injunctions for the homicide of non-Jews were applicable until the Messiah arrived on earth. On the other hand, Zionist-Talmudism insinuates that the Jewish people are themselves their own messiah.
Making careful distinctions on behalf of Judaic people not guilty of Israeli crimes is crucial. The Cryptocracy has a powerful interest in smearing the objective study of Israeli violence and its Zionist-theological root, claiming it is antisemitic to undertake such scholarship. Yet, the facts (if they still matter), testify that Zionism has been encouraged and established by Jew-hating elements within the Cryptocracy (more on that arcana below).
Rabbi Yaakov Shapiro (not to be confused with Rabbi Yitzhak Shapira), has authored perhaps the most comprehensive study of the perversion of Judaism by Zionist violence and colonialism in the 1,374 pages of The Empty Wagon (Bais Medrash Society, 2018). On pp. 1239-1240 we encounter a quote that gives an inkling of the esoteric forces at work behind Zionism:
“…in the history of Jewish persecution, the Muslims were always relatively better (more benevolent) than the Christians. We do not find tragedies such as the Chmielnicki massacres in the annals of our communities…in Islamic lands. The position has now been radically reversed… tens of millions of Muslims, in particular Arabs, have become Amalekites…What has brought about the wave of hatred that has engulfed the Moslem world? We all know that the major reason is the founding of the State of Israel.”
The preceding statement is from the late Rabbi Joseph B. Soloveitchik, dean of New York’s Yeshiva University and “one of the foremost religious Zionist authorities of the 20th century.”
Yaakov Shapiro observes: “Zionism was supposed to protect Jews from anti-Semitism. If Zionism actually causes anti-Semitism and undermines the security of Jews, then it has no excuse for its existence and no right to ask for support, as the entire ideology is undermined.”
The Talmud’s Three Anti-Zionist Oaths
The Talmud Bavli in Ketubot 111a records three oaths taken when the Jews went into exile after the destruction of the Temple. “One, that Israel not ascend the wall; another, that the Holy One adjured Israel not to rebel against the nations of the world; and another, that the Holy One adjured the gentiles not to oppress Israel too much.”
The first oath (against “ascending the wall”) refers to conquering by military force and the immigration of masses of Jews to “the land of Klal Israel.” Additional passages prohibit attempting to “force the end,” citing an account of the tribe of Ephraim having prematurely rebelled against the Egyptians and subsequently being extirpated.
These Talmudic halachos forbid Jews from engaging in collective political organizing and the use of military force. For 1300 years an overwhelming majority of all rabbinic authorities upheld these prohibitions. It was only when the Zionist ideology came to the fore that they were abandoned, or subjected to a reinterpretation that nullified them.
“You Pearl Harbor Us, We Nagasaki You”
— Rock musician Ted Nugent in an interview with Tucker Carlson
The Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor naval base killed 2,403 U.S. personnel, including 68 civilians. The U.S. bombing of the city of Nagasaki resulted in the deaths of an estimated 75,000 people, almost all of them civilians, in a metropolis with the largest Catholic population in Asia.
For American rock-and-roller Ted Nugent and many of his countrymen, it makes perfect sense to avenge an attack on a military base by exterminating the civilian population of a city.
Nugent’s inordinate fondness for frying Japanese people is of a piece with the current ugly American mania for eviscerating Arab people in Gaza. The bumptious bellicosity of bumpkins like Nugent comes from an inherent “victor’s justice” orientation that believes that whatever the Chosen American Nation does to foreign civilians can’t be a war crime because by definition we, the Good Guys, don’t commit war crimes.
“The loss of memory is the root of evil.’ —Sanskrit proverb
Gaza’s civilians have been bombed repeatedly since 2008. Who remembers?
Bobby Kennedy Jr. declared last week that the Hamas terror attack of Oct. 7 was “unprovoked,” even though the people of Gaza have been living in the world’s largest open air prison for sixteen years.
I’VE SEEN IT ALL BEFORE
Prior to October 2023, the Israelis murdered thousands of civilians in Palestine in December 2008-January 2009, and again in August, 2014:
A Palestinian father mourns his son who was killed Aug. 3, 2014 in the Israeli bombing of a United Nation shelter for civilians in Rafah.
A Palestinian father comforts his son after his mother was killed in the Israeli bombing of a United Nations shelter for Palestinians in Rafah, Aug. 3, 2014.
Aftermath of the Israeli bombing of a neighborhood in Gaza, August, 2014
It seems to be difficult for the Kennedys of the world to remember the deaths of women and children who Israeli Defense Minister Yoav Gallant calls “human animals. ”
Speaking at a campaign event in Iowa on Saturday, Oct. 14, Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis said he would not accept refugees from Gaza into the United States because “they are all anti-Semitic.”
It would seem he’s been reading Torah Ha-Melekh, in that on Oct. 15, on the CBS television News program “Face the Nation” DeSantis insinuated that all Palestinian children are terrorists.
Like the “Israel has the right to defend itself” slogan that precludes any Palestinian right to self-defense, anyone so foolish to do as this writer has done and investigate the extent to which racism and hate speech are endemic to Israeli “Hilltop Youth,” will find themselves canceled and libeled. DeSantis is free to judge Palestinian youth negatively. Don’t try it on youthful Israeli terrorists.
Tomer Persico writes: “The Jews who participated in the pogrom in (the Palestinian village of) Hawara…These arsonists are members of a younger generation of settlers, part of a novel social and theological circle within Religious Zionism, the development of which can be traced over the last two decades. Though ideologically distinct, these settlers enjoy the support of another, much more prominent Religious Zionist group that emerged over the same years and currently occupies the highest echelons of the Israeli government. Together, they form a large part of the ideational basis for present-day settler violence in the West Bank.
“…in December 2020, hundreds of Hilltop Youth went on a three-month rampage, damaging property and wounding Palestinian villagers throughout Samaria in nightly raids, smashing Palestinian cars at makeshift roadblocks, stoning and wounding members of the Israeli police and army—all in all, engaging in more than forty recorded acts of arson, vandalism, and violent attacks…this form of Jewish terrorism is the result of the development of a specific settler counterculture, arising over the last 20 years out of the lore of specific extremist rabbis: Yitzchak Ginsburgh and Dov Lior….
“On the night of February 26, 2023, among the burning houses in the Palestinian village of Hawara, Rafael Lebor, a resident of Yitzhar, where R. Ginsburgh’s main yeshiva is located, recorded himself on his cellphone. Excited and proud about the pogrom in progress around him, Lebor told the camera:
“There is something really exciting about this. What the army is unable to do, what the police will never ever do, simple Jews come and carry out a natural act of vengeance…Israeli Finance Minister Bezalel Smotrich agrees that a gruesome revenge must be exacted on Hawara and its residents…in his view, it is the duty of the state…to ‘wipe out’ the village” (end quote).
Gov. DeSantis welcomes these Israeli “Hilltop” youth to Florida. There’s no terrorism or hate associated with those fanatics. Certainly not! Only the children of Gaza, fleeing air force bombs and tank shells, are forbidden to enter Florida by the Republican chief executive who prides himself on being known as “pro-life Ron,” savior of babies, unless the babies are Gazans.
Lenin and Mao wrote studies whose thesis was “On Contradiction” and its occurrence in capitalist societies where the bi-polarities eventually become so virulent they distort the very psychic fabric of those societies. For the all chatter by Jordan Peterson, Victor Davis Hanson and Ben Shapiro characterizing America as an insane asylum run by Leftist inmates, their own schizophrenic two-tier view of who is truly human and who is not, contributes to our collective mental decay, as much as any far-Left fanaticism.
The End of Israeli Talmudic Zionism: The Aryan-Occult Conspiracy to Destroy the Jewish People
Subconsciously at least, it appears that Americans on the Right and the Left have a low opinion of Israeli leaders. Witness the virulence of the “False Flag” speculation that the Zionist leadership permitted the Hamas terror attack and the deaths of more than a thousand innocent Israeli civilians. It’s a conspiracy theory which, thus far, is largely evidence free in terms of its particulars. What should interest us however, is the psychology behind the rumor: those disseminating it are prepared to countenance the likelihood that the Israeli leadership (or a powerful faction therein), were willing to have large numbers of Jewish people killed to advance clandestine objectives of the Zionist cause.
In every system there are a certain number of undecidable propositions and anomalies resistant to the system itself and these paradoxes and contradictions may on occasion point us toward surprising truths. In my writing career I have experienced intense opposition and obstruction from the usual suspects, as well as from the far-Right and the Aryan movement. The two sides of this counterfeit coin resist the contradictions, paradoxes and aberrations attendant upon the discovery of real history. Opposition from the gentile far-Right derives mostly from an invincible naiveté, while the Zionist-Left intuits I’m headed in the direction of a Magnum Arcanum they fear.
Tracing the Origins of the Aryan Cryptocracy: The Scagegoating of Jews and the Ascendance of Usury Banking in the West
When I first encountered the Money Question in the footsteps of Ezra Pound, I was intrigued by the words of his colleague and defender T.S. Eliot, in Four Quartets:
“At the source of the longest river
The voice of the hidden waterfall
And the children in the apple-tree
Not known, because not looked for…”
If the New Testament is correct and the love of money really is the root of evil, then the problem of tracing the source of the institutionalization of this Satanism, and its emergence in the form of the control of national economies by private bankers, is paramount.
Going to the sources, or what is made to appear as original sources, leads to the “Shylock Jewish moneylender” meme and the nearly indelible stereotype that usury is mainly “the fault of the Jews.”
When I dug deeper I discovered that the “Shylock Jewish moneylender” caricature was the graveyard where the investigation of the rise of usury in the West is buried, which explains why, in arguing over it, Calvinists and Catholics, and Capitalists and Marxists, with their mutual recriminations, have for centuries strained at gnats, swallowed camels, and come to dust.
It begins not with a Jew but a Greek bearing the gift of illumination. His name is Gemistos Plethon and he was the founder of the authentic Illuminati, not the comic book apparition. He was a principal at the Council of Florence in the mid-15th century, under the patronage of “Catholic” usury banker and Platonic Academy founder Cosimo de’ Medici. At that point deep deception was birthed on a dozen fronts.
One of those was the point at which, 70 years later, the Medici Mafia gained ecclesiastical approval to establish their Mammon operation on a firm institutional footing. For those objectives to be realized it was necessary to place a Medici on the papal throne, from whence the renting of money was gradually granted papal permission under various euphemisms and escape clauses.
Branding “the Jews” as history’s mightiest, craftiest and most miserly usurers, the oppressors of the poor and makers of war, was the occult Aryan project, intending to misdirect observers away from their own identity as the vile architects of usury banking.
By this ruse, the German and Italian “Catholic” origin of the ascendance of the accursed Money Power over the West—the root of evil—was ascribed to “the Jews” rather than papal gentiles.
Before you head out to lynch a Vatican bishop, remember your history as well as the medieval adage, “The corruption of the best is the worst.” For more than fourteen hundred years Catholicism remained faithful to the command of Jesus in Luke 6:34-36.
It was only with the Renaissance-era infiltration of Christ’s Church that the usurious rot was incrementally advanced by papalists who swore it was “Calvin’s initiative” (Calvin was a child when it happened), and pointed to the culpability of “massive Jewish banking dynasties” (there weren’t any in Europe at the time), who were said to be responsible for the revolution. The “cui bono?” test was not applied. Had it been, the Church of Rome’s 16th century Aryan beneficiaries of the usury revolution would have been seen for who they were.
Fast forward 550 years: chameleon occultists at the level of deep cover, are sick unto death of “the Jewish project” and have been since the days of Madame Helena Blavatsky. They have convinced themselves that they have a nearly foolproof means of eliminating Jewish influence in the world. What could it be?
The Aryan faction of the Cryptocracy is engaged in giving the war Zionists carte blanche: a license to kill Arabs, boat loads of guns, bombs, jets, rockets, defense systems, cash, as well as political rallies, Congressional and media servility and US military personnel if necessary (President Lyndon Johnson provided “Israel” with the means to produce atomic bombs; President Kennedy may have killed in part because he obstructed that project; cf. Michael Collins Piper, Final Judgment ).
Along with these material resources and armaments are the spiritual and ideological: the green light for the genocide of the disposable Arabs, formulated with the Neocon cant language of Petraeus and Roberts. The high irony is that the largesse from the gentile governments are the nails in the coffin of the Israeli/Zionist imperium.
A couple of caveats: when I make reference to “Aryan” this is not anything having to do with the betterment of the white working class, any more than the Mafia benefits the Italian or Sicilian proletariat. The Aryan-occult Cryptocracy consists of white elitists who believe the legend that the Kabbalah is their Aryan-Egyptian book, purloined by the Jews centuries later. The Aryan ruling class has made war on the white working class since Elizabethan times, including the mass kidnapping and enslavement of their own kindred.
The Aryan occultists learned from the Kabbalah that one means of defeating a formidable enemy who cannot be overcome by head-on opposition, is to furnish that enemy with the means for success in order to destroy him through his own chutzpah yasgi (toxic arrogance).
Non-Zionist Rabbi Yisroel Elye Weintraub in his treatise Hatekufah B’saaras Eliyahu, and the Vilna Gaon in Brachos 5a, warn that to give the Amalekites who are reincarnated as Jews power in government, will cause the Jewish people to be subjugated and brought to the brink of destruction.
The nature of the conspiracy to choke to death Israeli Zionism with a surfeit of acquiescence, obeisance and materiel, is not necessarily the road to Armageddon and World War III. There are no nuclear powers in the region other than the Israelis. I don’t envision Russians entering the fray with atomic weapons.
“The Friends of Israel” have persuaded the Zionists to fight the demographic future in generational wars of attrition
Half the population of Gaza is under the age of 18. The many tens of thousands of nine-year-old kids who saw their parents, siblings and grandparents blown to pieces by Israeli bombing and shelling in Gaza in 2014, are now 18 years old. Some of them made their way into the ranks of Hamas and undertook the terrible butchery of October 7.
In this month of October 2023 there are now many little boys who will survive the Israeli carnage in Gaza. When they are 16 or 18 they too may take up the gun and the hang glider, the drone and rocket, and attack. What we’re witnessing is a generational war of attrition, guerrilla war in perpetuity; a low level insurgency that turns hot every three to five years, although lately the interval has become even shorter.
America’s Neoconservatives are willfully blind. No matter how many times insurgencies with deep roots among the people, whether in Vietnam, Iraq or Afghanistan have defeated the mighty United States of America, as well as their Israeli partners in Lebanon, Neocons are forever on the lookout for more conflicts involving US or Israeli troops, engaging in no-win wars on indigenous rebels who have deep roots in local villages and extended-family clans. The atrocities the Israelis have committed in Gaza this month are tailor-made to ensure more hatred for the Israeli occupation and more guerrilla war against their rule.
Palestinian sympathizers in Egypt, Syria and Lebanon, as well as non-Arab countries such as Indonesia and Pakistan—are also nations where more than half the population is under 18, as compared with the Caucasian nations and parts of Asia where more than half the aging population is frequently over the age of 40 or 50.
Someone has convinced the Israelis to commit to fight the demographic future, to commit war crimes, to disparage Arabs as animals, incorporate racial supremacy as an Israeli government dogma, and to circulate murder manuals among Israeli troops. It’s a script crafted by Jew haters intended to lead the Jewish people over a cliff marked “Masada.” Those who sound an alarm over this slow motion destruction of Judaics in Palestine are stigmatized as “antisemitic.”
Zionist-Talmudism (not Talmudism by itself), is the path of death prescribed for the Jews by their enemies: the Protestant TV preachers, the White House, Nancy Pelosi, the pope of Rome, the heads of the Fortune 500; the European Union, the British crown. Zealot Zionism and latter day sicarii (Zionism on steroids — the settlers), are its hand maidens. Covert Jew haters are today urging the Israelis to go into Gaza and “Kill ‘em all.”
The Islam of Muhammad is not found in the hierarchies of the corrupt tyrannies which have trapped millions of Muslims in dictatorships in Saudi Arabia, Bahrain and Egypt. Islam is a fire that neither Leftism nor capitalism have managed to extinguish. It has the memory of an elephant and the courage of a lion. Muhammad made usury banking (riba) in faithful Muslim nations impossible. For centuries Jews, adhering to the adroit survival tactics of the non-Zionist Talmud, made peace with Islam, living amicably, for instance. side by side with the Muslims of Palestine.
Those Aryan twins of mass murder, Harry Truman and Joseph Stalin, extended critical aid to counterfeit “Israel” in Palestine and since then the Stalins and the Trumans, the Freemasons, Neocons, Marco Rubios, Lindsey Grahams and “evangelical Christians” have urged the Israelis to prevail at any cost to non-Jewish life in Palestine, which is the most toxic message anyone could convey to Judaic people in the Middle East.
Thus does the curtain drop on the God-foraken sandbox the world calls the Holy Land, according to the stratagem of an Aryan cabal that organized in Florence, Italy in the middle of the 15th century and burrowed their way into power on earth.
I am not a Kabbalist, nor do I believe in its doctrines. It does however, contain a synchronicity that is a corollary to the intrigue we are investigating. According to the Kabbalistic Zohar, at the end of the fourth and last galus (period of exile), before the Messiah comes (a period known as the ikvesa meshicha), many of the the leaders of the Jews will be reincarnations of the Erev Rav (mixed multitude). They will include Amalekites who will be reincarnated as Jews. There are five types of the latter, all of whom will gains positions of leadership and influence during the final galus. They will look like Judaic people, possess the genetic yichus, and be in positions of power over most Jews, “operating as the captains of the ship of the Jewish people.” (Yaakov Shapiro, The Empty Wagon, pp. 143-145).
This is the Revelation of the Method.
Copyright ©2023 by Independent History and Research • Box 849 • Coeur d’Alene, Idaho 83816
FOR THE ADVANCEMENT OF KNOWLEDGE CONTRA CANCEL CULTURE.
I am grateful to the paid subscribers who make my column possible.
Michael Hoffman is a former reporter for the New York bureau of the Associated Press and the author of ten books of history and literature, including Secret Societies and Psychological Warfare (2001), The Occult Renaissance Church of Rome (2017) , Twilight Language (2021), as well as a textbook (Judaism Discovered), and five other books published in the United States, as well as overseas in Japanese and French translation; and 122 issues of Revisionist History® newsletter, 1997-2022. His truth mission is made possible by donations, paid Substack subscriptions, and the sale of his books, newsletters and recordings. Podcast: here. X (Twitter): here. Rumble here.
A REPLY TO MICHAEL HOFFMAN
From: Avgust Bornhauser
Has your position on Talmudism changed? I find rather different sentiments here than in your earlier works (eg Judaism's Strange Gods). This article seems to suggest that it is the Zionist version of Judaism, inculcated by Aryan Occultists, that is problematic--and hints that the 'original' Judaism is less harmful. But that isn't the interpretation I find in your previous research.
Dear Mr. Bornhauser
Thank you for your query.
Here is the "original" Talmudism as I clearly stated in my Oct. 17 study:
"One of the earliest laws distinguishing between Jews and gentiles is found in the Talmud Bavli, in Sanhedrin 57a: “Regarding bloodshed, the following distinction applies, if a non-Jew killed another non-Jew, or a non-Jew killed a Jew, the killer is liable for execution; if a Jew killed a non-Jew, he is exempt from punishment.”
I did not qualify, moderate or attempt to explain away BT Sanhedrin 57a. It stands as a self-evident indictment of Talmudism.
However, the failure to distinguish what I term the "weaponization" of the Talmud by Zionism would constitute a type of misdirection similar to that which the Church of Rome's Medici, Strozzi and Fugger bankers used to distract attention from their inaugural role in the institutionalization of usury in the West.
It's important to grasp the qualitative difference between the Talmud of Babylon and its derivative halachic texts as they were employed before Zionism and now, in this age of Israeli supremacist rule by bloodshed. Among the most implacable foes of Israeli mass murder and dispossession in occupied Palestine are the minority of Talmudic sects that reject Zionism.
The "Three Oaths" found in tractate Ketubot which I quoted, prevented pre-Zionist Talmudists from founding a Judaic army, waging military war and occupying Palestine. Is that singular fact not worth anything? Were it not for Zionism, Talmud or no Talmud, the "Holy Land" would consist of a Palestinian government, police and nation untouched by Israeli mass expulsions and mass murder. There would be no nuclear weapons in the Middle East. Peace between Arabs and Jews would be the order of the day. The positives are too transparent to need to list.
I have written nothing that moderates the hate speech in the Talmud, or its anti-Biblical and anti-Christian nature, or the oppression of women and low regard for gentiles which it imparts. I have however, pointed to the fact that some of those negatives, contrary to what is often imagined by those who have a superficial acquaintance with the תורה שבעל פה ( Torah sheBeal peh), were for centuries restrained by the requirements of Ketubot 111a and the halacha derived from it.
If you have read my big book on Talmudism ("Judaism Discovered") you are cognizant of the extent to which the resort to sharp business practices, guile, fraud, bribery and deception were utilized by persons in thrall to the Talmud and subsequent textual elaborations having binding legal authority, such as Maimonides "Mishneh Torah" and Karo's "Shulchan Aruch," and dozens of others.
Furthermore, because Jesus is an object of scorn and intense bigotry in Talmudism, the influence of His Church was often obstructed by various forms of subversion. For black people the impact of having been labeled hereditary slaves by the Talmudic gloss on Canaan and Ham, and Maimonides' assessment of blacks as subhuman in his "The Guide of the Perplexed" has led to untold misery and enslavement for persons of African descent.
None of these facts should cause scholars to fail to set the record straight in matters of war and dispossession in the Israeli occupation of Palestine, and the fact that Talmudism by itself is not responsible for the ongoing bloodshed and land theft there. A denial of those facts represents a denial of the genius of the Talmud in its astute assessment of what the non-Jewish world is willing to tolerate. Unlike the fundamentally suicidal meshugannah Zionists who have inflamed almost the entire Muslim world against "Israel," the Talmud brokered a kind of permanent truce with the goyim by refraining from undertaking the formation of an army and engaging in military warfare.
The relative peace that ensued from that bargain permitted the Jewish advance, from the mid-17th century onward, in the realm of finance, challenging the monopoly heretofore enjoyed by Rome's massive usury operations. Even in that pursuit, we have an Aryan model as the template for pioneering "centralized" usury operations. The Bank of England, founded in 1694, evolved into functioning as a private corporation which managed the debts of the government in return for lucrative fees. The US Federal Reserve Bank is patterned on that apostate Protestant financial system, which some Jews, like other ethnicities, copied and in certain respects, eventually surpassed.
There is the larger question of the extent to which Talmudists may have on occasion persuaded gentiles to fight their wars for them. The question itself is largely proscribed by the western media and academia. To suppress questions is to force them underground where they fester into conspiracy theories that gain credibility solely because they have about them the aura of the forbidden. Perhaps the most controversial asseveration along these lines centers on the involvement of Talmudists in the Bolshevik revolution in Russia; which is a question for another time.
Michael Hoffman www.RevisionistHistory.org
FOR FURTHER RESEARCH:
Michael Hoffman's Revelation of the Method is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.