An Orwellian Felony: In Scotland Seven Years’ Imprisonment for “Misgendering”

J.K. Rowling Stands up for Chromosomal Reality and the Rights of Women

“Reality is that which doesn't go away when you stop believing in it."

—Philip K. Dick

Scotland’s newly minted Hate Crime and Public Order Act makes it a felony to "stir up hatred" relating to age, disability, religion, sexual orientation, transgender identity or being “intersex.” The maximum punishment is seven years’ imprisonment. Scotland’s Prime Minister Humza Yousaf said the law was designed to deal with what he called a "rising tide of hatred" in society.

“Forced to deny the evidence”

In response to the new Scottish hate crime law coming into force on 1 April, J.K. Rowling, the lady author of the “Harry Potter” books, posted a statement of fundamental truths:

“In passing the Scottish Hate Crime Act, Scottish lawmakers seem to have placed higher value on the feelings of men performing their idea of femaleness, however misogynistically or opportunistically, than on the rights and freedoms of actual women and girls.... For several years now, Scottish women have been pressured by their government and members of the police force to deny the evidence of their eyes and ears, repudiate biological facts and embrace a neo-religious concept of gender that is unprovable and untestable…

“The new legislation is wide open to abuse by activists who wish to silence those of us speaking out about the dangers of eliminating women’s and girls’ single-sex spaces, the nonsense made of crime data if violent and sexual assaults committed by men are recorded as female crimes, the grotesque unfairness of allowing males to compete in female sports, the injustice of women’s jobs, honors and opportunities being taken by trans-identified men, and the reality and immutability of biological sex…

“The re-definition of ‘woman’ to include every man who declares himself one has already had serious consequences for women’s and girls’ rights and safety in Scotland, with the strongest impact felt, as ever, by the most vulnerable, including female prisoners and rape survivors.”

Rowling tested the law by listing 10 trans “women,” including a convicted rapist, sex abusers and high-profile activists on X, and stating that they were men.

Rowling declared that "freedom of speech and belief" was at an end if accurate descriptions of biological sex was outlawed.

J.K. Rowling, defender of women

“…if what I've written here qualifies as an offense under the terms of the new act, I look forward to being arrested when I return to the birthplace of the Scottish Enlightenment," Rowling said.” She added the Twitter hashtag “#ArrestMe.”

The “Hate Crime” of “Misgendering”

Siobhian Brown, Scotland’s Minister for Victims and Community Safety, told The Daily Telegraph that calling a transgender woman “he,” instead of by the pronouns which align with their gender identity, could be considered a criminal offense.

On BBC radio Brown averred that while Scotland’s government supported "everybody's freedom for expression," it was not acceptable that people "in our society should live in fear or be made to feel like they don't belong.” She added that Rowling was "not entitled to make people feel uncomfortable and to misgender someone.”

India Willoughby, Britain's first transgender broadcaster and one of the ten men listed by Rowling, reported the author to British law enforcement for “misgendering” on social media. Willoughby, a co-host of England’s ITV network program "Loose Women," revealed in an interview with Byline TV that Willoughby "reported J.K. Rowling to the police for what she said."

The "Loose Women" co-host's name was brought up on March 5, after another social media user shared one of Rowling's posts on X, formerly Twitter. Rowling wrote, "India didn't become a woman. India is cosplaying a misogynistic male fantasy of what a woman is.”

Willoughby replied, "For J.K. Rowling to deliberately misgender me knowing who I am is grossly offensive. It is a hate crime. I don't know if (the police report is) going to be treated as a hate crime, malicious communications, but it's a cut-and-dried offense, as far as I'm concerned," she said.

Britain’s Prime Minister Rishi Sunak said the United Kingdom had a proud tradition of free speech and that Scotland’s new law had given the police the wrong priorities. "We should not be criminalizing people saying common sense things about biological sex," he told reporters. "Clearly that isn't right.”

The cant by Scottish government officials about supporting "everybody's freedom of expression," is the window dressing that accompanies almost every draconian limitation on freedom of expression. It contains a loophole the size of the Grand Canyon: entitled categories of people should not be offended "or be made to feel like they don't belong,” consequently those who believe that a man, defined scientifically as possessing xy chromosomes, is not a woman—given that a woman has xx chromosomes—forfeit their human right to speech and press because the biological truth they express offends those engaged in a masquerade enforced by the police power of the state.

US Government Heading in a Similar Direction as Scotland

Whether the US government will eventually enforce this imposture through “civil rights” legislation (the “Equality Act”) remains to be seen. The papally-labeled “good Catholic” Joe Biden took an incremental step in that direction when he declared the day on which western civilization commemorates the resurrection of Jesus Christ (“Easter”), as “Transgender Day.” The president claimed that the “discrimination that transgender Americans face is worsening our nation’s mental health crisis.” In other words, a man pretending he is a woman is not itself a mental health issue; it is the “discrimination” he faces from those who insist on upholding the reality of biology that is the root cause of his woes.

President Biden spoke against attempts to protect children from physicians engaged in the lucrative practice of chemically and surgically maiming them to facilitate their alleged transition to the opposite sex. Mr. Biden also alluded to granting men who say they are women passports that will categorize them as female (“We are making public services more accessible for transgender Americans, including with more inclusive passports”).

Biden’s Equality Act, if passed by Congress, requires the Department of Justice to “intervene” to ensure a man who says he is a woman will not be “denied access to a shared facility, including a restroom, a locker room, and a dressing room.” A biological woman’s right to women-only spaces will become a matter for prosecution by the awesome law enforcement machinery of the Federal government.

The Abridgment of Freedom of Speech in Historical Context

British Prime Minister Sunak’s observation is welcome, however like almost all discussions of freedom of speech and press in the United Kingdom, the history of the gradual curtailment of free expression is omitted. The attack on freedom of inquiry and expression was exacerbated in the modern era in England  in 1994, when an elderly English aristocrat, 81-year-old Dowager Lady Jane Birdwood, was sentenced in London to three months in prison for publishing a pamphlet, The Longest Hatred, critical of the Babylonian Talmud. (Due to her age the sentence was suspended. She lost a substantial portion of her life savings in mounting her legal defense).  The law under which Lady Birdwood was prosecuted was a precursor to the repression we see emerging in Scotland.

Again in England, this time in 2009, Simon Shepard was sentenced to 4 years and ten months imprisonment and Stephen Whittle to two years and ten months for distributing a comic book which satirized the World War II era homicidal gas chamber narrative. Shepard served nearly four years before being paroled. Whittle received parole after two years.

Adil Khan, then of head of Britain’s local “diversity and community cohesion” bureau, described the successful prosecution as groundbreaking. Indeed it was, and one searches in vain to find Sheppard, Whittle or Birdwood in any list of martyrs to the cause of freedom of expression. They have been censored even from the rolls of the censored.

There is a link between the precedent of making it a criminal offense to publish critical scrutiny of the Talmud or a lampoon of Allied World War II history, and forbidding articulation of biological reality in Scotland. Without providing this context we can't know how Scotland arrived at the point at which it is now. The controversy is made to appear as though it arose from Erewhon, and that in general the United Kingdom guarantees freedom of speech, which it does not.

Moreover, in corporate America lobbyists for the curtailment of free expression such as the powerful pressure group GLAAD, have worked overtime to ensure that large corporations, fearful of “reputational damage,” enforce the Orwellian thought crime of “misgendering” on their work force, and any social or other media they control. In a press release from USA-based GLAAD (“the world’s largest Transgender media advocacy organization’), we read:

“The practice of targeted misgendering…has been identified by the Anti-Defamation League (ADL) and other civil society groups, including GLAAD and Media Matters, as a form of hate speech.

“Social media companies committed to maintaining safe environments for trans and nonbinary people should be able to recognize targeted harassing and abusive behavior directed at them as harassment and abuse, and should enforce their policies accordingly…GLAAD urge(s) all (social media) platforms to incorporate into their hateful conduct policies an explicit prohibition against targeted misgendering…of transgender and nonbinary people. This recommendation remains an especially high priority in our current landscape where anti-trans online rhetoric…are so prevalent, vicious, and harmful — and where we also see such an offline onslaught targeting the trans community…” (end quote, italics supplied).

Selective Enforcement Leads to the Establishment of a New Royalty

Society must necessarily make exceptions to free speech in cases of child pornography and clear and blatant advocacy of violence. Any other censorship invariably leads to selective enforcement, “Free speech for me, but not for thee.”

There are no prosecutions in the United Kingdom or the U.S. for criticizing the Gospel of Matthew and John, for publishing hatred of Germans and Palestinians, or for attacks on mothers of large families.

Daniel Jonah Goldhagen’s much admired 1996 book, Hitler’s Willing Executioners, argues that the German people in general have a genetic predisposition toward killing Jews. The British and American corporate world had no qualms about profiting hugely from Goldhagen’s book of prejudice and bigotry and promoting it in schools. (Goldhagen’s hate was demolished in 1998 by Norman Finkelstein and Ruth Bettina Birn in A Nation on Trial: The Goldhagen Thesis and Historical Truth).

Lee Child is the wealthy, best-selling author of dozens of “Jack Reacher” novels which have been made into movies. In his 2009 book One Shot (Dell Mass Market Edition, page 203), we read, “Vladimir was different. Vladimir was very tall and heavy and blonde. Unbelievably strong. It was entirely possible that Vladimir had German genes somewhere in his background. Perhaps his grandmother had picked them up back in 1941, like germs.”

Mr. Child’s racial smear of the German people has been no obstacle to his spectacular success as a literary phenomenon. It’s simply not an issue.

In October, 2009 the celebrated television producer, writer and comedian Larry David (creator of “Seinfeld”), on his HBO television show “Curb Your Enthusiasm,” is depicted entering a bathroom in his female assistant's home, where he splatters urine on a portrait of Jesus. Instead of wiping the urine off the portrait, Mr. David exits the restroom. Minutes later David's assistant enters, spots the urine-splattered image of the Christian savior and mistakes the urine for divine tears. Reaching the conclusion that Jesus is weeping, she summons her mother to the bathroom, where both women kneel in prayer.

Since Larry David performed his disgusting insult to Christians his power and stature in Hollywood and the media have done nothing but increase. In the New York Times he is greeted with panegyrics: “Larry David stands as an under-appreciated philosopher of our everyday lives. He has taught us important truths about both how we live our lives and how we should live our lives…Mr. David has…has offered up an alternative vision of life, one of lightness and joyful wisdom.” —Mark Ralkowski, “Larry David, Philosopher King,” NY Times, April 7, 2024.

According to the Times’ culture critic Wesley Morris, Larry David is “a 21st-century Emily Post, dispensing wisdom about etiquette in the modern world.” (“What Does Larry David Know About Manners? Our Critic on What ‘Curb Your Enthusiasm’ Can Teach Us about Etiquette,” NY Times, April 5, 2024)

The memory of the obscene insult to the Christian Savior committed by the “wisdom-dispensing” etiquette savant and “philosopher king” has evaporated into the rarefied air of the United States of Amnesia. We are expected to “relax,” and believe that Mr. David’s action does not constitute hate. It was all in fun. If it makes believers “afraid” or “offended,” too bad. Grow up, Christians. Get over it.

This laid-back, go-with-the-flow admonition is absent from the System-approved outrage that greets irreverence towards protected categories which are deemed sacrosanct, and about which no light-hearted dismissal can be countenanced by those who value their reputation.

In 2020 on Twitter social media, radical journalist Lauren Hough hurled a revolting, vile insult at Supreme Court Justice Amy Coney Barrett, opining that the mother of seven has a “clown car vagina.” Of course Hough, like Goldhagen, Child, David and a legion of other Establishment-approved haters, is in good standing in the world of corporate social media. Canceling her would be “an egregious act of Far Right censorship.”

Hate laws are tailored to render supreme certain categories of entitled humans, and subjugate those who are not entitled.  Even mild dissent constitutes the thought crime of “anti-trans rhetoric, prevalent, vicious, and harmful.” We are witnessing a revival of the Old World, two-tiered tyranny which institutionalizes a royalty/peasant divide, representing the aristocracy which the Founders of our nation adamantly opposed.

The Kingdom of Make Believe

Increasingly a make-believe world is being legislated where it is a felony to shout that the emperor has no clothes.

The line between fantasy and reality is fraying. The advancement of knowledge has become hostage to fanatical wokery. Our unshadowed, God-given, inalienable right of freely speaking, printing, writing and associating as we choose, is fading under the onslaught of an extremist, supremacist sexual revolution which insists on absolute domination over those who adhere to thousands of years of natural law founded on ineradicable biological facts.

To ensure that this supremacy is enforced it is falsely claimed that those who cannot ignore biology and will not deny women the freedom to associate with women alone, are hateful toward persons confused about their sexual identity. On the contrary, it is from a profound compassion toward those trans persons, whose inherent human dignity we respect—that we uphold, in the face of threats of all kinds, including cancellation online—chromosomal reality, the refusal of which is a principal source of their suffering.

This is not only a matter of the struggle for freedom of free speech. It’s a blatant shout-out, a red flag, a proclamation in garish neon that the leaders of the West, who sanctimoniously lecture China and Russia about their solemn obligation to protect freedom of thought, are intellectually enfeebled. We have no obligation to obey or consent to the ideology of those who are transparently non compos mentis. We are not duty bound to follow them into derangement under color of law, or the supposed obligations of citizenship.

We inhabit a western world where if I insist I’m Napoleon and you “deliberately misidentify” me as Franco, “knowing” I am Napoleon, then “it is grossly offensive. It is a hate crime.”

Should this institutionalization of dictatorial narcissism accelerate, the epitaph inscribed on our tombstone will read, “Here lies 3,000 years of Mosaic-Christian civilization extinguished by the kingdom of make believe.”

Copyright ©2024 by Independent History and Research

FOR THE ADVANCEMENT OF KNOWLEDGE CONTRA CANCEL CULTURE

Revisionist historian Michael Hoffman served as a mental health worker at one of the largest psychiatric hospitals in New York, where he provided compassionate care to his many patients, as detailed in his book, Twilight Language. He is the author of nine other volumes of history and literature including Usury in Christendom, The Occult Renaissance, and Adolf Hitler: Enemy of the German People. Michael is a former reporter for the New York bureau of the Associated Press and a former consultant to the news department of the New York Times. His work is funded by donations from truth seekers, the paid subscribers who make his weekly columns possible, and the sale of his books, Revisionist History®newsletters and recordings.

Revisionist History® is registered with the United States Patent and Trademark office as the exclusive trademark of Independent History and Research, Post Office Box 849, Coeur d’Alene, Idaho 83816.