By Michael Hoffman
On March 27 three children and three adults were massacred at a Presbyterian school in Nashville, Tennessee by a “mentally disturbed” — dare we say “demonically possessed”?—individual—a woman who allegedly believed she was a man. Contrary to the abominable crime in Uvalde, Texas where the do-nothing police were complicit in the sacrifice of the school children, the officers in Nashville dispatched the murderer fourteen minutes after the murder spree began, unlike in 1999 in Littleton, Colorado at Columbine High School, when the cops wouldn’t enter the school until they felt secure enough to do so.
The response of the corporate media to the killings of the six innocent Christians was anticipated: predictably, the culprit was said to be the guns themselves. These inanimate objects somehow floated into the Covenant Presbyterian School of their volition, loaded themselves and then aimed and pulled their own triggers. It’s the guns that bear the main onus of guilt, along with those legislators who support the right of the people to own the same weapons as our overlords in government, banking and Hollywood possess.
On November 21, 2021, when Darrell E. Brooks Jr. intentionally drove a sport utility vehicle into a Christmas parade killing six people, was it his SUV that was at fault? Should we ban SUVs? We don’t recall hearing such a ridiculous demand at the time, or since.
“Gun control” is almost always proposed in bad faith because the media refuse to investigate the postulates of the gun-grabbing ideology. President Biden, Nancy Pelosi, Sen, Schumer and the rest of our entitled ruling class do not for a minute advocate disarming the bodyguards who protect their own lives from harm. Joe and Jill, Barack and Michelle, to name just two entitled couples, are protected 24/7 by gunmen in possession of “weapons of war which no one should own.” Their lives count; yours doesn’t.
The ones who Democrats (and some Republicans) seek to disarm are the American people. If the media were honest they would ask Joe and his charmed circle of elite bureaucrats a good question, “Messers Biden and Obama, do you intend to take away the assault rifles which your guards possess?”
If Mr. Biden were honest he would declare, “No one among the common people should own an assault rifle. That’s what we mean when we say ‘gun control.” Such a statement would be an accurate reflection of King Biden’s actual agenda.
Under the most highly favored gun control legislation, the super-rich and the “connected” will be protected by “weapons of war” while the lower classes will have far less ability to defend their own lives. It’s a ruling class axiom: some are more equal than others.
If the right questions would be asked then we would have clarity about the nature of the game afoot. On the contrary, we are stuck in a fog of misperception for the reason Thomas Pynchon articulated, “If they get you asking the wrong questions, they don't have to worry about the answers.”
The answer to why the Christians were gunned down in Nashville can be found by unpacking the totalitarianism behind a transgender ideology advanced by zealots with a fanatical predisposition to suppress anyone who dissents from their dogma. This is illustrated very effectively in a new 91-minute documentary, Adult Human Female, in which several feminist, homosexual and lesbian academics, physicians and activists on the Left explain their dissent from transgender unreality and the price they have paid for their dissent.
The “Adult Human Female” movie is banned on college campuses such as Scotland’s University of Edinburgh. The union representing the professors is working to make the documentary permanently forbidden as “transphobic.”
We don’t think this film is appropriate for viewing by youth under the age of 18, and we disagree with considerable portions of it, yet we cannot deny that it is an instructive and insightful explication by independent Leftist people (mostly women), who are compassionately critical of the Trans movement.
As an exposé it is potent and in many respects incontrovertible, which is perhaps why it is has been intensely censored.
Some of those interviewed are doctrinaire Marxists. There’s much to differ with in terms of the political opinions and sexual mores of the people interviewed. However, in so far as these courageous speakers emphatically uncover the fallacies in the transgender dictatorship under which we live, we consider the film, which was produced in the U.K., enlightening. It can be viewed on the website of the producers commercial free (at the link we supplied above), or on YouTube (as of this writing), with commercial interruptions.
Rev. Doug Wilson: “Our problem today is that our sane people are insane. Our sane people no longer know what sanity is. When asked to define a woman, Ketanji Brown Jackson famously replied that she ‘was not a biologist.’
“Now she was not being interviewed to determine whether she might be eligible for early release from an asylum, but was rather being questioned in Congress because she had been nominated to the Supreme Court of the United States. She was nominated to a position of extraordinarily high responsibility, and she was sworn in despite the unbelievable lameness of that answer. And a society that appoints people like that to the highest court in the land, is a society that deserves everything it is going to get—good and hard.”
According to police the killer in Nashville left behind a “manifesto,” which has thus far not been released. We surmise this is because the manifesto makes the transgender movement to which the shooter belonged look bad, perhaps even in some way even culpable, and “our” government and media cannot allow that light bulb to click.
Culpability is not difficult to discover. On March 28, the day after the slaughter in Nashville, Josselyn Berry, Arizona Democratic Governor Katie Hobbs’ press secretary, tweeted a threat to kill people for being “transphobes.” Her tweet showed a photo of a woman holding two large revolvers pointed at someone off-screen. Berry captioned the photo, “Us when we see transphobes.” The photo is from the movie “Gloria” in which a woman kills mobsters.
A few days ago, Wayne State Professor Steven Shaviro declared on Facebook: “Although I do not advocate violating federal and state criminal codes, I think it is far more admirable to kill a racist, homophobic, or transphobic speaker than it is to shout them down.”
Shaviro seems to have had in mind the law students at Stanford University who, on March 9, threatened and shouted down Fifth Circuit Federal Judge Kyle Duncan, who had been invited to speak by the campus Federalist Society. The mob was agitated in part over an instance in which Duncan refused to alter the pronouns of a convicted child molester.
The dictionary defines the word vengeance as “punishment inflicted or retribution exacted for an injury or wrong.” The Trans Radical Activist Network, which is supported by stormtroopers from the Antifa terrorist gang, was organizing a “Trans Day of Vengeance” set to take place in front of the Supreme Court building in Washington D.C. on April 1. (After a public outcry it was canceled).
The victims of the Nashville mass murderer, pictured from top left, nine-year-olds Billy Kinney, Evelyn Dieckhaus, and Hallie Scruggs. At bottom left: Cynthia Peak, Katherine Koonce, and Mike Hill.
“I’m Joking”
A day after the March 27 massacre the ghoul who is President of the United States joked when asked whether he thought the victims were singled out for execution because they were Christians:
“Do you think that Christians were targeted [in the Nashville shooting]?” Biden was asked by a reporter outside the White House.
“I have no idea,” Biden responded with unconcealed callous indifference.
“(Senator) Josh Hawley believes they were. What do you say to that?” a reporter added.
“Well, I probably don’t then,” Biden responded with a smirk. “No, I’m joking. No, I have no idea.”
In the video of the exchange one can see that Mr. Biden is irritated by even being asked the question of whether or not Christians were targeted.
The fact that he could not care less is clearly telegraphed by his frivolity—he makes no attempt to conceal his depraved indifference.
This is the brazen contempt—which not only the President of the United States but the ruling class in general are now unafraid to display in public—for murdered Christian children.
This is The Revelation of the Method.
Copyright©2023 by Independent History and Research
This column is made possible by the paid subscriptions of some of its readers. Thank you.
Michael Hoffman, a former reporter for the New York bureau of the Associated Press, is the author of Secret Societies and Psychological Warfare (2001), The Occult Renaissance Church of Rome (2017), Twilight Language (2021) and six other books published in the U.S. Three of his works have been translated into Japanese and French and published overseas. He hosts the podcast, Michael Hoffman’s Revisionist History® and is at work on a book-length study of unfree labor in Britain and colonial America. Michael is an independent scholar free of corporate allegiance and university affiliation.
Thank you again for your article Michael. Always insightful and educational. I would like to share something as one on the Right who is a custodian, purist and lover of accurate, correct, ordered, precise, proper and sound intelligent language which even Orwell [Eric Blair] taught we ought to strive for. I ask that whoever reads the following, please consider it;
If you really believe you are against the NWO agenda and thus *the Left*...then you use 'sex' [Rightspeak / Truespeak / Oldspeak / Biblespeak] NOT 'gender' [Leftspeak / Confusionspeak / Delusionspeak / Falsespeak / Inversionspeak / Trickspeak =Devilspeak], confu-sexual [Truespeak / Rightspeak etc] NOT 'trans-gender' [Leftspeak / Falsespeak etc =Devilspeak] .. you do not use 'trans-phobic" because you will learn or know this is a sordid Leftist invention, and what is called a linguistic corrupted constructed barbarous hybrid [half Latin and half Greek] compound neo-logism that breaks rules of philology in order to be formed. If we do a correct translation it literally means;
"across, over, through, passing over, going across" + "awe, wonder, fear/panic" ... now ask yourself, honestly, why are they claiming this so barbarous hybrid supposedly means what they claim and should you really trust a Leftist, who have as one of their pillars, to be language hijackers and destroyers, either by intentional act or lucent linguistic incompetence, in how you construct words correctly in intelligent English? Same goes for this so corrupted degenerate construction hybrid of "trans-gender", it literally translates to;
"across, over, through, passing over, going across" + "Creation, beginning, birth, gendered..." or it means with the second factual etymology of 'gender' also "across, over, through, passing over, going across" + "Family/Kin" ... why does the Left tell you it means something totally different? The below will elucidate;
Consider this;
When we use Socialist/Communist words [Leftist language] that have utterly corrupted and perverted false definitions [barbarisms, catachresis, solecisms, misuse and abuse], we actually help the Leftists/Socialists/Communists/Collectivists spread the sheer intellectual and linguistic degradation, stultification, poisoning and destruction of accurate, correct, ordered, precise, proper sound intelligent English [ACOPPSI] [and language in general] even more which Orwell fought against which is one of the main reasons he wrote NE-F. Those who knowingly or unknowingly perpetuate this deliberate agenda by the Left to destroy ACOPPSI English and language, well they are also helping to spread this Leftist/Socialist/Communist/Collectivist thought and linguistic poison to others, which makes others more intellectually and thus linguistically stultified by being a useful tool and fool [wilfully ignorant or just ignorant] in assisting the Leftist/Socialist/Communist/Collectivist w/o even realising it, into intellectually degenerating others into a form of “Fool/Idiot-speak” especially if one is uninformed on this very important matter.
In his important essay, ‘Politics and the English Language’, George Orwell foresaw the corrosive impact of Socialist and Communist “verbal purification” [read: hijacking and destruction of ACOPPSI English and language in general] of the life of mankind. He warned that:
*“If thought corrupts language, language can also corrupt thought. A bad usage can spread by tradition and imitation even among people who should and do know better.” *
Cultural Marxism a.k.a. political correctness is indisputably intellectual colonialism and mental fascism for the gendering/begetting [true definition] of “thought-crime.”
Thus;
*"The basic tool for the manipulation of reality is the manipulation of words. If you can control the meaning of words, you can control the people who must use the words."* - Philip K Dick.
*"As societies grow decadent, the language grows decadent, too. Words are used to disguise, not to illuminate, action: You liberate a city by destroying it. Words are used to confuse, so that at election time people will solemnly vote against their own interests."* - Gore Vidal, Imperial America, 2004
*"And if all others accepted the lie which the Party imposed—if all records told the same tale — then the lie passed into history and became truth. 'Who controls the past' ran the Party slogan, 'controls the future: who controls the present controls the past.'"* - George Orwell, "Nineteen Eighty-Four" pg. 32
*"The thing about words is that meanings can twist just like a snake, and if you want to find snakes look for them behind words that have changed their meaning."* - British author Terry Pratchett (1992)
*"Political language.... is designed to make lies sound truthful and murder respectable, and to give a appearance of solidity to pure wind."* - George Orwell
*"It's a beautiful thing, the destruction of words."* - "Nineteen Eighty-Four" by George Orwell.
*"How strangely will the tools of a tyrant pervert the plain meaning of words."* - Samuel Adams
There is evidence that this was staged, like so many others. Mr. Hoffman either hasn't caught up to that yet or - more probably - is intentionally misleading his audience. See, for example: mileswmathis.com/updates.html, Gematria effect news https://youtu.be/R5XmAix6F9E