I read this before falling asleep last night, wondering at "icon" Bob Dylan's/Robert Zimmerman's words: "...You don't count the dead when God's on your side." I woke up this morning with the tune, "I'm Henry the 8th, I am, Henry VIII, I am, I am"
--from somewhere, I have no idea who did that song, but it was everywhere, "elevator" music. Oh the sweeping, occulted, Hollywood panorama of English history (we who were raised on self-worship don't see idolatry) --
Henry VIII, that ugly, drunken, gluttonous, murderous pig of a "king", father of Eliza I, has done more damage to the West, along with John Dee, than we may ever know, as our history is erased and rewritten, most especially by Hollywood. "In the time of the assassins" --
am looking forward to the further development. Michael Hoffman has written about this abundantly over the years in his RH newsletters.
None of these points are hidden, nor do they need to brought out as long held secrets just being discovered. There are enough books on the times and Elizabeth specifically that neither hide nor suppress these truths. I have known about all of them for years. The author is doing a one sided hit job singling out various acts and persons who supposedly tainted the Queen and with whom she colluded, thereby being an evil person. There is a other side of the story (as there always is) that leaves out contexts, backstories or even an attempt at understanding the environments, practices and mores that guided their decision making to deal with the problems of their personal and public lives. I find that people living in current times should not be passing judgement on those living long past. These are the same tactics used by social justice types to cancel out the life of people both alive and no longer alive, with whom they disagree, who they wish to scapegoat and be the whipping boy for all their own ills. Rank cowards who derive twisted satisfaction for doing so. No respectable historian would throw such personal invective into the pages of history. Those who throw stones should live in glass houses. Perhaps the author would like to describe the horrible acts of the Inquisition, the Jesuit vow to destroy all Protestants and their calumnies to do so since 1540, the genocide by 16th century Spanish Empire exacted on at least 2/3 of the indigenous peoples of South American, it's plundering, rapine, mass murder, subjection and outright theft of the resources of it's colonies. Catholic Europe's hatred of the Protestant "bastard" Elizabeth and what she had to do to fight off the clutches of Spain and the Papacy, as well England's bankruptcy and impoverishment That would give some balance to this story. I could go on and on about this epoch with which this single woman and her government was challenged.
Thank you for your comment. Unfortunately it is long on opinion and short on citations and references. For example, will you please name the books and their dates of publication from "years" ago that replicate the information in my study of Elizabeth I? You say you have known all about the secrets of Elizabeth "for years." What were your sources for these revelations? Please be specific.
You write, "Perhaps the author would like to describe the horrible acts of the Inquisition."
I have done so--in my book "The Occult Renaissance Church of Rome"-- and in the study you are critiquing. If you care to re-read it you will encounter my negative observations on the Spanish and Italian inquisitions.
The Establishment has repeatedly publicized those unjust papal tribunals while remaining comparatively silent on the inquisition represented by, for instance, the Henrician massacre of the participants in the Pilgrimage of Grace who marched for freedom of worship, and Elizabeth's mass torture and murder of Catholics who could not find it in their conscience to attend the services of the state Church of England.
You say you "have known about all of them for years," in which case your dudgeon should be directed at the Protestant inquisition, as well as the inquisition perpetrated by the Church of Rome.
I don't see how a Bible-believing Protestant can defend the disgraceful regime of Elizabeth I, steeped as it was in slave trading, pagan occultism, and having as her chief counselor (after Cecil and Walsingham), the soothsayer John Dee who invoked demonic spirits for purposes of divination.
If these facts have been well known for many years as you contend, then the Protestant world has been woefully negligent in failing to call to account the promoters of the Elizabethan cult of the "Protestant Gloriana."
However, I question your allegation of the existence of an alleged surfeit of "books on the times and Elizabeth specifically that neither hide nor suppress these truths." Most Protestants imagine that Dee was little more than a harmless crank who provided counsel to Elizabeth during her time of trouble. If they were aware of her arcane connections and Dee's diabolism the queen's pop cult would soon be deflated in conservative Protestant circles, but such is not the case. Ignorance of her true record prevails, protected by Hollywood and the Cryptocracy in general.
I am just now reading that Elizabeth turned to the occult arts. Your new research is much anticipated.
Katya here, thanks to God, to Roscoe, to Michael.
I read this before falling asleep last night, wondering at "icon" Bob Dylan's/Robert Zimmerman's words: "...You don't count the dead when God's on your side." I woke up this morning with the tune, "I'm Henry the 8th, I am, Henry VIII, I am, I am"
--from somewhere, I have no idea who did that song, but it was everywhere, "elevator" music. Oh the sweeping, occulted, Hollywood panorama of English history (we who were raised on self-worship don't see idolatry) --
Henry VIII, that ugly, drunken, gluttonous, murderous pig of a "king", father of Eliza I, has done more damage to the West, along with John Dee, than we may ever know, as our history is erased and rewritten, most especially by Hollywood. "In the time of the assassins" --
am looking forward to the further development. Michael Hoffman has written about this abundantly over the years in his RH newsletters.
Roscoe says it was Herman's Hermits!
Who were they?
A British band in the 60s, I believe. I remember the song well.
None of these points are hidden, nor do they need to brought out as long held secrets just being discovered. There are enough books on the times and Elizabeth specifically that neither hide nor suppress these truths. I have known about all of them for years. The author is doing a one sided hit job singling out various acts and persons who supposedly tainted the Queen and with whom she colluded, thereby being an evil person. There is a other side of the story (as there always is) that leaves out contexts, backstories or even an attempt at understanding the environments, practices and mores that guided their decision making to deal with the problems of their personal and public lives. I find that people living in current times should not be passing judgement on those living long past. These are the same tactics used by social justice types to cancel out the life of people both alive and no longer alive, with whom they disagree, who they wish to scapegoat and be the whipping boy for all their own ills. Rank cowards who derive twisted satisfaction for doing so. No respectable historian would throw such personal invective into the pages of history. Those who throw stones should live in glass houses. Perhaps the author would like to describe the horrible acts of the Inquisition, the Jesuit vow to destroy all Protestants and their calumnies to do so since 1540, the genocide by 16th century Spanish Empire exacted on at least 2/3 of the indigenous peoples of South American, it's plundering, rapine, mass murder, subjection and outright theft of the resources of it's colonies. Catholic Europe's hatred of the Protestant "bastard" Elizabeth and what she had to do to fight off the clutches of Spain and the Papacy, as well England's bankruptcy and impoverishment That would give some balance to this story. I could go on and on about this epoch with which this single woman and her government was challenged.
Dear Rebecca Denhoff
Thank you for your comment. Unfortunately it is long on opinion and short on citations and references. For example, will you please name the books and their dates of publication from "years" ago that replicate the information in my study of Elizabeth I? You say you have known all about the secrets of Elizabeth "for years." What were your sources for these revelations? Please be specific.
You write, "Perhaps the author would like to describe the horrible acts of the Inquisition."
I have done so--in my book "The Occult Renaissance Church of Rome"-- and in the study you are critiquing. If you care to re-read it you will encounter my negative observations on the Spanish and Italian inquisitions.
The Establishment has repeatedly publicized those unjust papal tribunals while remaining comparatively silent on the inquisition represented by, for instance, the Henrician massacre of the participants in the Pilgrimage of Grace who marched for freedom of worship, and Elizabeth's mass torture and murder of Catholics who could not find it in their conscience to attend the services of the state Church of England.
You say you "have known about all of them for years," in which case your dudgeon should be directed at the Protestant inquisition, as well as the inquisition perpetrated by the Church of Rome.
I don't see how a Bible-believing Protestant can defend the disgraceful regime of Elizabeth I, steeped as it was in slave trading, pagan occultism, and having as her chief counselor (after Cecil and Walsingham), the soothsayer John Dee who invoked demonic spirits for purposes of divination.
If these facts have been well known for many years as you contend, then the Protestant world has been woefully negligent in failing to call to account the promoters of the Elizabethan cult of the "Protestant Gloriana."
However, I question your allegation of the existence of an alleged surfeit of "books on the times and Elizabeth specifically that neither hide nor suppress these truths." Most Protestants imagine that Dee was little more than a harmless crank who provided counsel to Elizabeth during her time of trouble. If they were aware of her arcane connections and Dee's diabolism the queen's pop cult would soon be deflated in conservative Protestant circles, but such is not the case. Ignorance of her true record prevails, protected by Hollywood and the Cryptocracy in general.
Michael Hoffman
https://www.revisionisthistory.org/page1/news.html