1). Why is the “word of God” any more trustworthy than any other document? I assume since you reference Yahweh that you are referring to the what Christians call the Old Testament. Each and every book of the Old Testament, like the Talmud, was written down by a men belonging to an ancient near eastern tribe which was deeply ethnocentric and racist and would have had every reason to engage in propaganda. Why is it the world of God? Because they say so! Some of the books, like that of Esther, don’t even reference God at all and appear to be entirely gloating war propaganda. Much of the Hebrew Conquest is clearly hyperbolic (other tribes were “utterly destroyed” yet appear later in the narrative) and the Creation Narrative is not historically, geologically, or scientifically plausible. There is scant genuine archaeological evidence for its history as well, despite the modern state of Israel’s intense search for it. Could it be that just maybe its authors suffered from conformation bias? Could it be that “Yahweh” is just a particularly jealous ancient near eastern god that happened to inspire particularly effective propaganda that keeps many in thrall to this day?
2). I was not as impressed at Dr. Unz’s article as you. He even states that in Allison Weir’s book (which he praises) she clearly states that the Balfour Declaration was the result of some kind of deal, which he just dismisses, despite the fact that Mrs. Weir provides citation and even published on her website information regarding this crucial point which you omit (https://ifamericansknew.org/us_ints/balfour.html). It seems that Dr. Unz has no real method to this process of informing himself, dismissing and accepting concepts and facts arbitrarily.
3). I appreciate your truth telling in regards to Hitler, who was clearly a disastrous leader. In the efforts to revise the record on the “holocaust” many are going into areas that are just nonsense. Considering said individual has been dead for nearly 80 years I think we would all be best served by focusing on the evidence and getting our history to be in conformance with reality as much as possible.
The American writer Alison Weir (not to be confused with the British historian of that name) helped to publicize the study.
Personally, I don't see how Mr. Rubinstein's article, published in "History Today" (February 1, 1999) undercuts the thesis of Mr. Unz that America did NOT enter the First World War due to Zionist lobbying and pressure.
Another reference is in her book, Against our Better Judgment, but being that it's paper, and my children are messy, and I am not a good organizer, I cannot find it. Perhaps you have a copy...Ms. Weir states that Balfour was basically a deal made between the British Empire and the Zionists where they would get the land in exchange for support against the Ottoman Empire (or what was left of it by 1917). Notably Balfour's declaration seemed to be in direct contradiction to the McMahon Agreement just two years prior, something that I feel is essential in this discussion yet neither you nor Dr. Unz brought up (if I recall). https://www.historylearningsite.co.uk/modern-world-history-1918-to-1980/the-middle-east-1917-to-1973/the-mcmahon-agreement/
Against our Better Judgment by Alison Weir, 2014 page 17: "While the previously appealed to religious or idealistic arguments, now Zionist leader could add a particularly powerful motivator: telling the British government that the Zionists in the U. S. would push America to enter the war on the side of the British, if the British promised to support a Jewish home in Palestine afterward."
Citation reference:
William Yale in The Near East : A Modern History, 1968, p266-270
Yale was an authority on the middle east working for the State Department and a professor of history. He was qualified to write collegiate texts on the middle east in a time when academic accomplishment and integrity mattered.
Ms. Weir goes on to cite numerous quotations from Yale that prove her assertion unambiguously. In short, the simple dismissal of the point about about Balfour being a quid pro quo for the Zionists to get Palestine is backed up by considerably more weight than basically all of Dr. Unz's article or this one. I don't have William Yale's book however, perhaps it would be worth obtaining it from my University's library to see if he makes citation to original sources.
Reading Yale's book it references several other books and contains Original Sources: "Dr. Chaim Weizmann....was able to say as the chariman of an English Zionist conference held on May 20, 1917: 'I am entitled to state in this assembly that His Majesty's Government is ready to support our plans" Citation was History of Zionism by Sokolow. https://archive.org/details/historyofzionism02sokouoft
Re your Item #1, after I read Hoffman's essay, I was about to ask the same question.
However, as to the Creation story, it was not meant to be taken literally. But simple minded people tend to do that. The description of creation has to be taken apart and understood by people with rational minds.
PS: Genesis 1 and 2 (King James version) is one of the finest things I have ever read, no matter how anyone chooses to understand or interpret it.
Lemme see...30 million views and 25 thousand comments on a silly song about navels. Right. As to A&E, I don't know what their abdomen looked like. I've never seen them.
I love Cuttle Fish Horsea. Know why? They glow light and even change colors as they see fit to do. It is one of the most mesmerizing creatures of the deep blue sea. The bio-luminescence of life in the deep blue sea is a wonder to behold. Fascinating beyond belief really.
Next up is the firefly which having the ability to light up is another fascinating creature resembling I must say the very angels of heaven. Butterflies i often refer to as miniature angels. Blow one up to the size of a hulk hogan give it some human qualities and voila an angel! But why am I telling you this?
God isn't stupid!! Adam and Eve weren't naked in the Garden of Eden not originally but rather were themselves clothed in the light of the Creator God. We can know this from a number of different sources which are both biblical and extra-biblical sources. In the book of Daniel 12 we find it written that at the time of the second coming of Christ some, the wise, will shine as bright as the stars of heaven and to find that written should tell us that was the way it was originally with our first parents. They however, lost that covering of light and so became naked before God. Wow, what a loss! Sob.
As for the extra -biblical well next to the above about fireflies etc, a lady named Anton Sawyer in her prophecy Ichabod or Revival she says this as given to her from our Father:
You know what He said? "I'm coming to visit My people and My glory is awesome." I said, "God, I don't understand Your glory." I have a grandson which I absolutely adore. He said, "What do you desire the most?" I said, "I want to love that grandson. I want to hold him and kiss him and love him." "What if I told you My glory was upon you and you couldn't even look at that grandson?" I said, "God, that would be the cruelest thing you could ever do to me because I know I would forget. I would want to touch him.." And that child disintegrated in front of me. God says, "That's what My glory does to sin." God said, "Adam and Eve were in the garden, clothed with My glory. We communed face to face When they sinned the glory fell and I wanted to embrace them but I didn't because My glory would consume them." So God the Father had to back off and Jesus became the way. Jesus stands between us and the Father."
You know, the sun is shining down on this earth. It's got two deadly rays. If they weren't deflected by the earth's atmosphere we would be consumed. If Jesus didn't stand between us and the Father, we would be consumed. But you know what Jesus says? He says, "Bride, I'm getting you ready for glory. I've got to get you purified. I'm going to get you holy because I want to present you to My Father, spotless, that He may touch you, that He may embrace you, that He may hold to His bosom without you being consumed."
i never want to hear the laughable nonsense that Adam and Eve were walking around naked as though God were stupid to even let that happen in full view of not only Himself but the very angels of heaven.
And so for you another 'never taken to be meant literally?'
"It seems that Dr. Unz has no real method to this process of informing himself, dismissing and accepting concepts and facts arbitrarily."
That is exactly correct.
On Freedman, he offers: "When I first encountered these claims a year or two ago, they hardly inspired a great deal of confidence. Freedman was in his 70s at the time of his speech, recounting events that had transpired 45 years earlier, and recollections can easily grow garbled over the decades, with many of his other statements about the First World War being factually incorrect."
Riddled with logical fallacies (e.g. ad hominem) and not one specific rebuttal. Freedman, among other things, cites a dramatic shift in the Jewish media's attitude toward Germany. Unz didn't deal with that.
"The Jews went also as they usually do to the heart of things, and the Executive was attacked. The last and apparently the most unpopular of the presidents, Mr. Wilson, seems to have been wholly in their hands." - Hilaire Belloc (Catholic writer), The Jews p. 202
So much for Unz' claims about the WASP elite controlling President Wilson.
"Meanwhile, what I found most striking in reviewing all of this material was the total lack of any supporting evidence from the American side. Surely if the nefarious Zionists had somehow managed to manipulate America into declaring war against Germany at least some Americans would have become aware of that fact and mentioned it in their writings or private diaries. Yet I found absolutely nothing."
This is an argument from silence, another logical fallacy.
I have read most of your writings and I appreciate many aspects of your writings, especially the Talmud Exposures, as they are often very insightful.
However "saint" Paul, was not an Apostle, was hired by the Jewish Pharisee's-with his thugs-to murder Jesus and his followers. His "conversion on the road to Damascus was Total BS to place him in a position of power, backed by the Pharisees and Dark powers in Rome, into the remaining inner circle of Jesus followers to Hijack Jesus Teachings which is exactly what he did. Most Christians, some unknowingly, follow the Demiurge "god" Old Testament teachings and the Murderer/Slaver Paul's teachings. Jesus was/is a Gnostic Essene.
Interesting idea you bring up here. Despite being Christian for nearly twenty years it wasn't until recently that I began to seriously read the Old Testament beyond the first chapters of Genesis (the creation narratives...plural intentional). I was pretty much horrified and asked my wife, a cradle Catholic, if she though we should allow our children to read...the bible. She replied of course not, and asked why I was reading it. I later found out there was a controversy very early in Christian history, long before the canons were codified, regarding Marcion of Sinope who pretty much rejected the Old Testament God as incompatible with the teachings of Jesus. I see the logic to this, as reading the Israelite conquests and thereafter the Sermon on the Mount would seem to be contradictions, or at a minimun, suggest divine schizophrenia. Of course the Gospel accounts we have today have many examples were Jesus says He and the "Heavenly Father" are ONE, and the name Jesus is a play on words referencing Yahweah, meaning supposedly "Yahweah saves." Obviously Christian orthodoxy has adopted the latter logic rather than the former (Marcion), and sought to more or less ignore the logical contradictions which I consider evident. One would think there would be whole volumes on this topic because it is so glaring, but there really aren't. I've read Is God a Moral Monster by Copan and The Lost World of Israelite Conquest by Walton and Walton and even C.S. Lewis on the Psalms (several Psalms like 136 are curses, stating for example "blessed is he who dashes the Babylonian babies on rocks"). Copan and Waltons are both protestant and perform textual historical analysis that tries to demonstrate that really the Israelite conquests were relatively minor and comparatively more civilized that contemporaries and that the Canaanites were really bad cannibal child sacrifice practitioners. Gee...what better way to demonstrate that killing babies is wrong than by killing all the babies of the baby killlers? Guess they can't kill babies now that they have been "utterly destroyed." C.S. Lewis just throws up his hands and states plainly he has no way to make sense of the curse psalms.
What you bring up is novel however. I am aware of Joseph Atwills "Cesar's messiah" which claims that the Romans invented Christianity to undermine Jews, which had a habbit of revolting, and make them into good imperial tax paying citizens, but then why did the Romans martyr so many Christians? It seems to me you are suggesting that the Pharisees installed Paul as a sort of double agent to subvert Christianity from within?
I appreciate your True Insights. Many people have them but are shamed by Religions to not Truly awaken but to believe the utter BS. Crusades, Inquisitions, Body and Blood of Christ (I'm not a cannibal or vampire), Jesus died for our sins-oh yea how did that work out for humanity and Jesus was murdered. Burning at the stake if you are considered a Heretic and if you don't bow down and Worship their Insane, Psychotic, Mass Murdering, Ethnic Cleaning, Mass Child Sacrifice, Jealous "god" who is really an aspect of Satan and a Annunaki Monster Space Alien you go to hell. If you are not one of the "Chosen" you are a Goy sub-human servant, or if you are not a Christian you are going to hell, or if you are not Saved you are going to hell. The Old Testament is mostly this "god's" Biography and the only thing worse is the Torah which it is based on and the Talmud which most of it is utterly disgustingly Psychotic. Mr. Hoffman's book on the Talmud is excellent Exposure. The New Age nonsense is another trap as is atheism, a religious belief in "science". Alcohol, drugs, gambling and P*** are Huge traps. These "gods" have had their way for thousands of years, are and have been fighting for ultimate Supremacy and look where it got us.
There are trapped Sparks of Light from the True Divine Rescuers such as the True: Moses, Zoroaster, Elijah, Jesus, Mother Mary, Manicheas, Shiva, Sawaswati, and such sparsely incorporated into the Bible and the other religious books to attract those of Good heart and trap them in the Psychotic "gods" clutches. The True Divine Mother/Father God knows each Spirit and does not want to be worshiped, does not want sacrifices but just wants you to hold on to your Will and Connect to the True Divine.
"The True Divine Mother/Father God knows each Spirit and does not want to be worshiped, does not want sacrifices but just wants you to hold on to your Will and Connect to the True Divine."
Is there such a word as conférés or did you maybe mean "confrères"? Or could "conférés" be a sort of useful made-up word meaning "persons conferred with"? From conférer (to confer).
(Excuse my using the reply space; my primitive device doesn’t allow me into the comment space.)
To start with quotes from Michael: “Our nation follows the Word of the Talmud into servitude, and rejects the Word of God. What could go wrong?
“Biden is president, the southern border is massively invaded, the media is captive to the Khazars, our children, if they survive the mass movement to murder them in the womb, grow up to be mentally imprisoned by woke ideology…”
“This is our own doing. We have volunteered for ignorance, rebellion, subjection, and captivity.” (Rev. Hist. Bulletin #4)
In “Judaism Discovered,” you can read about the Rules (Halachos) of Manslaughter on p. 477. On p. 478, you can read about the policy of Amalek and the wiping out of genes, which is genocide. On p. 483, you can read about the divine mandate to kill Jesus Christ and Christians. This is all part of the Talmud. That we have let the mental virus of the talmud infect all of our American institutions—government, legal, education, church, media—ensures that we have “dug the graves of our children.” (MH)
And Mr. Unz: “But political power is largely based on the perception of political power, so ideological movements always have an obvious incentive to exaggerate their influence and past successes” (quoted from the article above). Thus we have the eternal deception, dissimulation, hoodwinking, and the continuous memory hole of what might have been our true history, but for the efforts of the few truth seekers.
“Outrageous!!” says Netanyahu over the ICJ ruling. “Hague Schmague” says Ben-Givr.
Thank you always Michael Hoffman and also Ron Unz. St. Paul told us about the veil we wear over our eyes.
In honor of my God-father at baptism, Franz Enslinger, an Austrian boy inducted into Hitler’s army and left for dead on the Russian Front (for a description of this slaughter, see Hoffman’s book on Adolf Hitler), I’ll give a quote from this book, p. 166.
“A self-imploding boobytrap devised by the virus of Kabbalism: Every kabbalistic creed must subvert the Bible, either through nullification (rabbinic Judaism and Freemasonry), distortion (renaissance “Catholicism”) or outright overthrow (Communism, Nazism and modernism).”
The 21st century’s great “crime” is telling the truth; the (usurious) cost of honesty is so very high, and before our numbed and silenced being a great “genocide by fake news” (Dr. Vernon Coleman) is happening, right now, all around us in the West. And we will see our children sacrificed.
Mr. Hoffman’s writing always brings Dante’s Divine Comedy to mind, so let me quote from Dorothy Sayers on Canto XVIII, her commentary: “In the Circles of Fraud (the abuse of the God-given faculty of reason) the ministers of Hell are no longer mere embodied appetites, but actual devils, images of the perverted intellect. … The image is a sexual one; but the Panders and Seducers allegorically figure the stimulation and exploitation of every kind of passion — e.g. rage or greed — by which one may make tools of other people.”
Making tools of other people. “Their especial weapon is that abuse and corruption of language which destroys communication between mind and mind.” TV. Internet.
Michael Hoffman: “ The mortal sin of idolatry” — the “tincture in the blood” of tyranny — “the slough of self deception”. I pray to our precious Lord Jesus that we may learn again how to read.
“Meanwhile, what I found most striking in reviewing all of this material was the total lack of any supporting evidence from the American side. Surely if the nefarious Zionists had somehow managed to manipulate America into declaring war against Germany at least some Americans would have become aware of that fact and mentioned it in their writings or private diaries. Yet I found absolutely nothing.
Wow, what a great piece I enjoyed reading it thoroughly but I'm terribly puzzled because of some information i have in front of me here. It comes from a book entitled The Day the Dollar Dies by Dr. Willard Cantelon date of publication 1973 Logos International.. Note that Dr. Cantelon was Oxford trained, held a distinguished chair there and was an advisor to U.S. Presidents and was at all of the important meetings internationally covering the unfolding events politically in banking especially throughout the world. The history he reveals blows me away and yet when I read essays as this one above I'm like huh what? Further to this to read that Run Unz balks at the notion America funded Hitler is absurd to the extreme and he dismisses it outright again I go huh, what?
I take Hitler to be little more than a useful idiot who was set up by the International Bankers. Here is a quote an extensive one at that to regarding some missing pieces. From pages 44-66:
And in underground vaults five stories below Wall Street reside more than a hundred thousand gold bars worth well over a billion dollars. But though this gold is on American soil, it is not ours. It bears the stamps of the central banks of any one of seventy foreign countries. But in spite of the physical guard placed on the gold at Fort Knox and in the sub-basements of the New York banks, America's gold steadily drained away. If the gold could speak, it might impart quite a story of the miles it had traveled from country to country and from one hand to another. .At the height of her power, Britain took much of the gold from the Spanish. The Spanish took it from the colonies that they invaded. At the close of World War I, when the leaders of the Western world met in the beautiful Hall of Mirrors to sign the Treaty of Versailles, Germany was compelled to deliver up all the gold she possessed in the Reich Bank of the nation. It would not be long, however, before much of America's gold would move back again to Germany and to western Europe.
ln 1934, when legislation was passed prohibiting the American public from owning gold currency, the door was left wide open to the foreign holders of American dollars to claim gold in exchange for their paper. But even before this international stage was set, Representative Louis T. McFadden (R-Pa.), Chairman of the Committee on Banking and Currency, made statements on June 10 of 1932 which indicated America's gold was already moving back to Europe. His statements were recorded in the Congressional Record and pages 140-174 in H. S. Kenan's book entitled The Federal Reserve Bank. Representative McFadden speaks of those on the other side of the water with a strong banking "fence getting the currency of theFederal Reserve Banks-exchanging that currency for gold and transmitting the gold to the foreign confederates."
McFadden named the dates on which America's gold was shipped to Germany:
On April 27, 1932, $750 thousand in gold was sent to Germany. One week later another $300 thousand in gold was shipped to Germany the same way. In the middle of May of that year, $12 million in gold was shipped to Germany. . . .Almost every week there was a shipment of gold to Germany-these shipments are not made for profit.
Representative McFadden referred also to the comments of Senator Elihu Root:
Long before we wake up from our dreams of prosperity through an inflated currency, our gold which could have kept us from catastrophe will have vanished, and no rate of interest will tempt it to return.
In his report to Congress, Louis McFadden asked the question,
Why should our depositors and our government be forced to flnance the munition factories of Germany and Soviet Russia?
Representative McFadden continued,
Gold was taken from the entrusting American people and was sent to Europe. In the last several months $1,300,000,000 in gold has been sent to Europe every dollar of that gold once belonged to the people of United States and was unlawfully taken from them.
As I weighed the words of Louis McFadden and other lawmakers, I also witnessed the fantastic scene of America's vanishing gold. The record was unbelievable:
1949 - $24,500,000,000
1958 - $21 ,593,000,000
1959 -$20,478,483,000
1960- $19,420,997,000
196L - $ 17,667,587,000
1962-$.15,997 ,647,000
1965-$13,733,000,000
On and on the gold drain went, unabated. Then came the crisis in the spring of 1968. We were living in Europe at that particular time. On March 14, hysterical crowds of people crowded, screamed, and scrambled their ways to the windows of the banks of England, and to the bank windows of the sub-basements of Paris to exchange their paper for gold. On one single day, the crude and the cultured, the peer and the peasant, carried off 200 tons of the precious metal. They stored it in secret places of their homes and deposited it in various banks in strongboxes labeled with fictitious names.
On that day Senator Everett Dirksen in conversation with Secretary of the Treasury Fowler, William McChesney Martin, and a dozen other senators said,
We have reached the bottom of the barrel.
It seemed like only yesterday when I spoke on monetary matters when America had $26 billion in gold in her treasuries. By June 30 of 1971, it had been reduced to $10.5 billion. stop quote
So hows that for an interesting piece of history and why?
Unfortunately, no, but given the title and what I've read in others places its not something new or unknown to me. Dr. Cantelon has a chapter Man Made Solutions, Communism and the UN. Imagine the architect of the UN was none other than Alger Hiss: Here's an interesting paragraph::
Russia was spending more than a billion dollars on literature and propaganda outside of the USSR each year. The doctrines of socialism were not only being taught in the classrooms of the colleges, but were also being heard from the pulpits of many churches, and from the pens of religious leaders.
I wonder, I said to myself, how many Americans have studied the charter of the UN sufficiently to realize that commits each member nation to a program of total socialism for itself and for all other nations. Alger Hiss was a major architect of the UN charter and served as the
secretary general of the San Francisco conference for the organization of the United Nations. Twenty-flve years later, U Thant was quoted praising Lenin, as a political leader whose ideas were reflected in the United Nations' charter. close quote page 102
So there you have everything one needs to know really. But for me none of it matters because something far, far more important and significant is on the horizon and O if only Dostoevsky were around to see what is unfolding. He would have written the definitive work on the subject given that world famous quote of his about we are working not with thee but with him for who can control men if not he holds there bread and conscience in its hands. That would be the CBDC and the question I'm asking is the QR Code the mark that St. john saw two thousand years ago? Imagine if Dostoevsky were around today i bet he would be saying it sure looks that way!!! Scripture says doesn't it 'HERE IS THE MIND THAT HAS WISDOM" Rev. 13 this was the thesis of Dr. Cantelon's work trying to gain the knowledge of where money came from and where it will ultimately end and how. His entire thesis was actually summed up by a commentator Asia Teacher:
"In a world of digital currencies, governments will finally control individual wealth. Communism by the back door."
The curtain of St. Matthew 25 is about to go up and not a day goes by wherein I don't say too myself is this day the antichrist arrives? I do believe it is in the shadows now working its final majic. Think well on the parable of the 10 virgins and be one of the wise to endure to the end and be saved Anthony.
Additionally here's a juicy morsel to dig ones teeth into as well:
from pages 65-67
Some of the strongest words that came to my attention were those of Curtis B. Dall, written in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, on April 1968, as an introduction to H. S. Kenan's book on the Federal Reserve Bank. In reference to the international bankers, Mr. Dall writes,
They are driving toward complete control of the world's long-range monetary policy and principal
world markets for their own profit. They foment foreign wars to aid this objective.
It did not take a brilliant mathematician long to prove with simple arithmetic that war debts allowed to continue would soon burden the people of the world with such indebtedness that it would take most of the earning power of the masses simply to pay the compounding interest. Was it possible, I asked myself repeatedly, that men could so crave power that they would be willing to sacrifice millions of lives to the god of war in order to achieve their goals? If it were true, were they so deluded or deceived that they justified the mass slaughter of the innocent as a socalled stepping-stone to a better world they were seeking to build? Regardless of the questions, or their answers, here was one certain fact: the world was swiftly moving toward centralized government and universal control. The
General Assembly of the United Nations frequently echoed with accusations and dissension. But there was one power that seemed even stronger than man's endless legislation. It was the power of money. Whoever controlled it, controlled man's destiny. The path toward world control seemed to be indeed a divided highway. On one side, there were the shadowy personalities representing the high priests of finance, who visualized the wealth of the world in few hands-their hands. On the other side of the road, there were a number of men, honest and sincere, who pointed out that the total commitment to a world government was man's only hope of escaping a nuclear holocaust. Or famine from exploding populations, or poison from pollution..
Checks Obsolete
Members of the Federal Reserve warned that the nations' banks could strangle on the 22 billion checks the Americans wrote each year, pointing out that in a hundred months the number of checks would double. They urged the adoption of a computer system which would automatically transfer funds between bank accounts. A person's pay would automatically be credited to his bank account by his employer, without the writing of a check. And the regular payments which the worker owed-car payments, rent, etc. -would automatically be sent to his creditors' accounts when due. George Mitchell of the Federal Reserve declared it was most urgent to reform the checking system before the economy smothered under a pile of paper. I did not know George Mitchell personally, but I did know many honest and sincere bankers who shared his sentiments. There was Carlos Verheek of the Kredietbank
of Belgium, and Banker Keller of Germany.
Mountains of Paper
As I sat with Banker Keller in his Stuttgart office, I heard him heave a weary sigh. "We are being buried under paper," he said sadly. From the doorway of his office I could see the lines of people standing impatiently before the bank tellers. I knew that back home our government was spending $350,000 a minute. The welfare program alone was costing the taxpayers more than a billion dollars a month' In a
four year period, the federal budget had increased 84% and in five years the money supply 47%
ln America, I had talked with my banker friends' Without exception every banker realized we were coming to the end of an old regime and the dawn of a new era' Our early an-cestors had-used shells, iron, cotton' or cattle as a medium of exchange Then gold' Now, the paper currencies were becoming as antiquated as all of the obsolete systems that man had used. A new system was about to dawn over the entire world and it would be a number system' made possible by the birth of the computer in 1946.' close quote
It seems to me one has to understand monetary history to really understand historical events. I light of that imagine it was a Dr. Carrol Quigley who after being given access to the International Bankers secret papers and records came of the opinion that they were the hope of the world? Further to this i find it odd to have comes across where I no longer remember where but a quote that they never thought that the worlds wars would take on such a bloody murderous tone as they did? To that its hard to believe a man like Hitler who saw the trench warfare of WW1 and was hardened by it all hes the one that became Chancellor? A corporal as Rommel insulted him later? My quest though has always been a question that continues to bother me to this day. Christians murdering Christians?
and with that are these final words form Dr. Cantelon:
WORLD GOVERNMENT
I sat in Brussels in March, 1972, with my friend, Dave Oliver, who had devoted 28 years of his life to tirelessly working with the Atomic Energy Commission. In recalling the first atomic bomb dropped on Hiroshima on August 6, 1945, we were impressed that it was the voice signal of the U.S. President, Harry Truman, that released that bomb from the B-29 that flew over Hiroshima on that memorable
day. With knowledge of that amazing incident, we turned in the prophetic Scriptures to the prophecies of John in the book of Revelation. Here the prophet not only spoke of a one-world government, canceling the old monetary currencies of the past and establishing a new number system, the prophet also spoke of a world leader, having authority over, the military power of the world, and declared,
Power was given him over all kindreds, and tongues, and nations [and he adds], He maketh fire come down from heaven on the earth in the sight of men. (Rev. l3:7, 13)
If a man became head of a world government and possessed such power, surely it would be greater than what any man in history had ever possessed before him.
What would happen if such power was invested in a man who should turn into a maniac like Adolph Hitler? Was there such a danger? Of course there was, and most sober minded leaders of government realized it. But man seemed to be caught between two undesirable alternatives. The old paths behind him pointed back to Hiroshima, Nagasaki, and 50 million dead from World War I[. The other path offered the forfeiture of rights by individuals and nations being pushed daily nearer to a form of world government.
Grenville Clark said,
Perhaps it may take a few nuclear bombs and several million deaths.
And Joseph Clark added,
The people will follow when the leaders tell them there is no alternative.
Messiansim? Only in the Bible do we find the mentioning of a Messiah but alas what we will see first of all is the Abomination of Desolation. So were back to those words "Who do the people say that I am."
Well, wow. To me it looks as if you have summarized Modernity exterminating itself, the reign of Quantity and the measure of the worth of all things in Money, which in our world is a force of Sterility. Read Hoffman’s “Usury in Christendom” to get a start on figuring out where all the gold is going — hint: it may not have to do with the world you can touch. Has to do with hearts that cannot be found in autopsies. (Read the story of St. Anthony)
And of course, there’s always Dostoevsky who has answers for all of this in all of his books. “Crime and Punishment” has special things to say about money —
E adesso basta e grazie tanto Michael. Buona notte tutti.
Thank you, Katya. The only point I wanted to make was that Hitler was one of those useful idiot that the International Bankers stringed along. Beyond that we didn't know how to fight the good fight of faith and those that did largely lost their lives to the power of money. I'm reminded of the words of Abraham Lincoln on this point:
In 1863, Lincoln said,
I see in the near future a crisis approaching that unnerves me, and causes me to tremble for the safety of my country"...money power will endeavor to prolong its reign....until wealth is aggregated into few hands and the republic is destroyed.
Yes usury is the name of the game and its not rocket science Katya and reading Hoffman on usury took me back 2 decades to what i heard and learned on the subject about some kings of England who were against it. Here for your info the page on it and lets have some fun shall we:
The Power of Interest
The brilliance of Edison and the honesty of Abraham Lincoln caused each of them to speak out firmly against the dangers of national debts and compound interest. They knew that the history of the Western world for 1,694 years had forbidden the taking of usury. King Alfred the Great in 901 declared,
If any man is found taking usury, his lands will be confiscated, and he will be banished from England.
In 1215, King John echoed the same announcement as Alfred, and as late as King James in 1566, the king declared,
If a man is found taking usury, his lands will be confiscated. It is like taking a man's life, and it must not
be tolerated.
I recalled one evening in Portland, Oregon, when I picked up a copy of the book entitled The Chronology of Money written by Wickliffe B. Vennard. In illustrating the power of compounded interest, Vennard suggested that if one penny had been deposited in the year A.D. I at 6% compounded interest, by 1895, that penny would have had an accrued value of $8,497,840 decillion! The figure so staggered my imagination, I could not comprehend it. Later that night, somewhere
between midnight and dawn, I pushed back a ream of paper and concluded wearily that this man spoke the truth. For hours I had worked with pen in hand, proving to my own satisfaction that his statement was not an overstatement. Naturally, one could not comprehend the magnitude of one decillion dollars, but if it were illustrated with symbolism that could be understood, one decillion dollars would be equal to 610 quadrillion worlds of solid gold. And what would that mean? The world, I had learned in early life, weighed 6,600 billion times a billion tons. Naturally no one would consider banking a penny with the thought of leaving it almost two millennia. But many a man could face more realistically a debt that would double in approximately 12 years, or be a thousandfold greater in a century, at the approximate rate of 6% compounded interest. John Maynard Keynes, who wrote on the power of interest, referred to the $200,000 in gold that Sir Francis Drake gave to Queen Elizabeth, gold that he had taken from the Spanish on the high seas. This mattered little, because they had only taken it from the inhabitants of Mexico or South America. Keynes reviewed the fact that Queen Elizabeth made Francis Drake a knight for bringing home the gold, which later became part of the investment
in the East India Trading Company.
"By 1930," said Keynes, "every dollar that Drake had brought to England would have grown in value to a hundred thousand dollars under a rate of 3 3/4% compounded interest."
But of what concern is this to us in our day? Lawrence R. Klein wrote in The Keynesian Revolution regarding national debt,
An internally held public debt can never be a burden because we owe it to ourselves.
No burden-because we owe it to ourselves? I asked myself slowly. Is $500 per second not a burden on the taxpayers? For every tick of the clock, Americans must pay in taxes over $500 in interest on a national debt that is over $400 billion. Not a burden? Is it not a burden to pay over $ I 1/4 billion every 30 days in taxes on interest on a national debt? pages 32-33 Cantelon
In 1847, he was bitterly opposed to the policy of issuing bonds. he said,
If our nation can issue a dollar bond, it can issue a dollar bill. the element that makes the bond good, makes the bill good also. The difference between the bond and the bill is that the the bond lets the money brokers collect twice the amount of the bond.
When the government in his day wanted to borrow $30 million to develop the mucle Shoals Project, Edison said,
It is stupid to borrow $30 million, and have to pay moneylenders $ 66 million for the use of the money.
Edison was convinced that global -socialism would be brought about by the creation of debt and interest perpetrated on the nations by the international moneylenders. Close quote page 30 Cantelon
For any interested imagine the level of wealth of just one banking family?
The House of Rothschild
Meyer Amschel Rothschild (1743-1812) of Frankfurt, Germany, studied originally to be a rabbi. Later, however, he turned his interests to finance and, with his five sons, established the famous banking house in Frankfurt. Four of the sons were later sent to Vienna, London, Paris, and Naples to set up branches of their family bank. This combine soon became the most powerful banking establishment
of Europe. Amschel Rothschild, the eldest son, remained with his father in Frankfurt and became the
treasurer of the German Confederation. Salomon, the second son, founder of the Vienna branch, became a leading personality in the Austro-Hungarian Empire. Nathan, the third son, founder of the London branch, became the rnost powerful man in English finance. Carl, the fourth son, founder of the Naples branch, became one of the most powerful men in Italy. James (Jacob), the fifth son, founder of the Paris branch, soon dominated the financial destiny of France. BY 1850, THE HOUSE OF ROTHSCHILD'S REPRESENTED MORE WEALTH THAN ALL THE ROYAL FAMILIES OF EUROPE AND BRITAIN COMBINED.
International Bankers
The House of Warburg, the House of Rothschild, the few other powerful banking houses became known as "the international bankers." They are described best by Dr. Carroll Quigley who taught at Princeton and Harvard. He did research in the archives of France, Italy, and England and authored several widely read books. When Dr. Quigley decided to write Tragedy and Hope (Macmillan, 1966), he knew he would be exposing one of the best-kept secrets in the world. Regarding the international bankers, Dr. Quigley states,
They remained different from ordinary bankers in distinctive ways: (1) they were cosmopolitan and international; (2) they were close to governments and were particularly concerned with questions of government debts; (3) their interests were almost exclusively in bonds and very rarely in goods; (4) they were, accordingly, fanatical devotees of inflation; (5) they were almost equally devoted to secrecy and the secret use of financial influence in political life. These bankers came to be called the international bankers.
Wow, how much of the world is indebted to them? Further with so much wealth i often wonder about a possible robinhood moment. i mean really what better way for Satan to gather to itself the world than to pull off a robinhood type event? To redistribute the wealth of the world will most assuredly cause it to become a kind of savior or even a god in the eyes of all but for that blessing you will have to do what? Take the mark ala Big Brother and worship it as it said to our savior Christ Jesus?
So something to think about? and Dr. Carroll Quigley after having gone threw they're secret papers refereed to them as the hope of the world? DEBT? Wow, imagine the kind of wealth they must be sitting on? More wealth than all of the royal families combined? WHEW?
Gerry, thanks for all this. It shows you aren’t indifferent, as it is far worse to be uncaring, as Rene Guenon (Crisis of Modernity) says.
For Lincoln, may I recommend a new book from Shotwell Press entitled “Nonsense on Stilts: The Gettysburg Address & Lincoln’s Imaginary Nation.” Might tell you what I think of that indoctrination.
And then let me recommend Larry Romanov’s wonderful and lengthy article on UNZ.com entitled “The Richest Man in the World”, and another one on the effects of materialism on American youth — these will be archived under Romanov’s name on Ron Unz’s site. Great reading.
And lastly, back to Michael Hoffman’s books and newsletters: mind boggling research on the effects of the occult (Neoplatonic Hermeticism) on our “economy” (Greek for balance of the household) starting way back just before what we call the Renaissance, which Guenon calls the beginning of the modern period of death. Michael has done incredible work on the math and sorcery of John Dee (007) during Elizabeth I’s reign and the Consolidation of the British Empire. Remember that our giant of profane science was Isaac Newton, whose chest of Hermetic (occult, sorcerous) writings was discovered in the attic of the Royal Society by John Maynard Keynes (a Malthusian, by the way). It’s an unreal world we live in, marked by a hallucinated financial system that has sold our children into slavery. Please look over Michael Hoffman’s oeuvre and read it. ‘‘Tis mind blowing. We are so spellbound, we smart moderns.
Again thank you. Yes to Romanov. I read that piece some time ago over at the Saker.is blog. Not too much new to me but in reflection about such massive wealth three things jump out at me the first of course they started out as Rabbi's. If that doesn't tell one everything one needs to know really. Warburg to began his career as a Rabbi. And this all from Germany? Second would be Rothschild sets up shop where globally? Great Britain? His palatial palace in the North of England I believe is impressive? Third thing however, is coming from a Rabbinical past I kind of feel sorry for them or perhaps a better word is pity. Why so? Well put yourself in they're shoes and how hard it must be to sit on such massive wealth and power and yet you can't get what you really want from life and what is that exactly? The rebuilding of the Third Temple in Jerusalem and the reconstitution of a nation. No wonder the violence over the Balfour Declaration! One can only imagine being a fly on a wall in the mans study? Reminds me of the words of God to Samuel about being shut out from God when they cry out to him for relief from they're king and all of his taxes lol!!! Wait forever they will if they don't go to that place we Christians know very well. What was Christs words? You will never see me again until you say blessed is he who comes in the name of the Lord. And that occurs when? When they wake up and realize yikes the antichrist is actually an impostor as they run for the mountains and caves!
Britain? Wasn't it Churchill who said, 'you can trust America to do what is right after she has tried everything else.'
Cheers
PS. Here's a juicy morsel of info which Romanov knows nothing about:
In an edition of the Los Angeles Times in April, 1973, Murray Seeger tells how the government leaders in Russia seek to control men's minds and spirits. He describes the heavy volume of anti-religious action and propaganda which have been continued in all parts of Russia against
many different faiths ever since the Bolshevik Revolution took place 55 years ago.
In light of the Communist attitude toward Christians and Jews, are men not justified in asking why this government should receive favored treatment?
Why should American taxpayers pay $300 million in taxes to subsidize cheap wheat for the USSR? Or why should Russia get 200,000 tons of butter from The European Common Market for 20 cents per pound, when the British pay 60 cents for the same butter?
Perhaps some of the international bankers might shed some light on this. They might tell us how the Communist banks were able to borrow 40 billion Eurodollars six months before the dollar was devalued 10% on February 6th of 1973 and comment on the extraordinary good
fortune of their timing. For when this debt is repaid, it will be repaid with dollars valued at 90 cents which means a net profit of $4 billion for the borrowers.
Only one thing is clear wrote one economist from Europe "and that is the mystery that surrounds these strange actions." Cantelon pages 112-113
Ukraine the test case for Rev. 13? and Cantelon circa 1973 ?!?!?!?!
Who Will Control the Money?
Communist or capitalist, banker or president of the nation, all men seemed to agree that those who controlled the finance of a nation represented a power greater than any other legislative body.
I recalled an afternoon in Brussels when I addressed an international group in the Metropole Hotel. Apart from John Bains of the Brussels-Phoenix Press, the audience were strangers to me. Most of the men present held high office in various departments and were favorably disposed toward the new system on which I was to speak. I concluded my luncheon address by saying,
"Gentlemen, you look with approval upon this coming new order and the new system it will bring. You believe it has the answers to some of the frustrations and unanswered problems of the present moment, but I, in all sincerity, would like to ask you one basic question before leaving you today: who will control it?"
A hush fell over the room. I looked from face to face in search of an answer. On one side sat a four-star general, on the other, an attorney. None offered to speak.
"Perhaps," I said, "you feel that none of us has the answer to this question: Who will hold in his hand your future in this new international government with its new world money system? But there is an answer. It is spelled out clearly by a man who lived 2,000 years ago and described these very days."
Opening my Bible, I read once again the familiar words of John, the prophet, who wrote concerning a world government and its leader who would hold power over all kindreds, and tongues, and nations . . . and causeth all, both small and great, rich and poor, free and bond, to receive a mark in their right hand, or in their foreheads: And that no man might buy or sell, save he that had that mark . . . or the number. (Rev. l3:7, 16-17)
pages 58-59
Watching what was written thousands of years come to fruition is simply stunning isn't it?
Much of the Old Testament Clearly being the Biography of the Psychotic Demiurge/Satan god, it is self-evident, and if we do not Bow Down to and Worship this Extreme Psychopath then he will hit us and our with Fire and Brimstone. He Commands many-many times that entire towns be attacked, men-women-children-animals be slaughtered and burned so he can smell the delicious aroma and in some cases he wanted a large share of the spoils including virgins-children and cattle because he is a corporeal being (has a body).
There is very little of the True Christ in Christianity, enough to draw in many good people, but most is the worship and obedience to the "god" noted above.
Consider "saint" Paul, who was no saint and not an Apostle, but an assassin for the Jewish Pharisees. He hijacked many of Jesus True teachings to the ridiculousness of the New Testament:
Ephesians 6 1
Slaves, obey your earthly masters with respect and fear, and with sincerity of heart, just as you would obey Christ.
I temporarily paused my account for personal reasons but had the privilege to read this, one of your most interesting short writings.
One question. How do you reconcile your belief that, “It is Yahweh who chooses who will believe in Him and who will not.” With, Fate, which is a pagan Greek concept? I always believed that the gift of free-will disallows this.
A few thoughts.
1). Why is the “word of God” any more trustworthy than any other document? I assume since you reference Yahweh that you are referring to the what Christians call the Old Testament. Each and every book of the Old Testament, like the Talmud, was written down by a men belonging to an ancient near eastern tribe which was deeply ethnocentric and racist and would have had every reason to engage in propaganda. Why is it the world of God? Because they say so! Some of the books, like that of Esther, don’t even reference God at all and appear to be entirely gloating war propaganda. Much of the Hebrew Conquest is clearly hyperbolic (other tribes were “utterly destroyed” yet appear later in the narrative) and the Creation Narrative is not historically, geologically, or scientifically plausible. There is scant genuine archaeological evidence for its history as well, despite the modern state of Israel’s intense search for it. Could it be that just maybe its authors suffered from conformation bias? Could it be that “Yahweh” is just a particularly jealous ancient near eastern god that happened to inspire particularly effective propaganda that keeps many in thrall to this day?
2). I was not as impressed at Dr. Unz’s article as you. He even states that in Allison Weir’s book (which he praises) she clearly states that the Balfour Declaration was the result of some kind of deal, which he just dismisses, despite the fact that Mrs. Weir provides citation and even published on her website information regarding this crucial point which you omit (https://ifamericansknew.org/us_ints/balfour.html). It seems that Dr. Unz has no real method to this process of informing himself, dismissing and accepting concepts and facts arbitrarily.
3). I appreciate your truth telling in regards to Hitler, who was clearly a disastrous leader. In the efforts to revise the record on the “holocaust” many are going into areas that are just nonsense. Considering said individual has been dead for nearly 80 years I think we would all be best served by focusing on the evidence and getting our history to be in conformance with reality as much as possible.
Dear Anthony
This is a better link to the study on Amery:
https://ifamericansknew.org/history/amery.html
It originates with William D. Rubinstein.
The American writer Alison Weir (not to be confused with the British historian of that name) helped to publicize the study.
Personally, I don't see how Mr. Rubinstein's article, published in "History Today" (February 1, 1999) undercuts the thesis of Mr. Unz that America did NOT enter the First World War due to Zionist lobbying and pressure.
Another reference is in her book, Against our Better Judgment, but being that it's paper, and my children are messy, and I am not a good organizer, I cannot find it. Perhaps you have a copy...Ms. Weir states that Balfour was basically a deal made between the British Empire and the Zionists where they would get the land in exchange for support against the Ottoman Empire (or what was left of it by 1917). Notably Balfour's declaration seemed to be in direct contradiction to the McMahon Agreement just two years prior, something that I feel is essential in this discussion yet neither you nor Dr. Unz brought up (if I recall). https://www.historylearningsite.co.uk/modern-world-history-1918-to-1980/the-middle-east-1917-to-1973/the-mcmahon-agreement/
Against our Better Judgment by Alison Weir, 2014 page 17: "While the previously appealed to religious or idealistic arguments, now Zionist leader could add a particularly powerful motivator: telling the British government that the Zionists in the U. S. would push America to enter the war on the side of the British, if the British promised to support a Jewish home in Palestine afterward."
Citation reference:
William Yale in The Near East : A Modern History, 1968, p266-270
Yale was an authority on the middle east working for the State Department and a professor of history. He was qualified to write collegiate texts on the middle east in a time when academic accomplishment and integrity mattered.
Many of his writings can be accessed here: https://library.unh.edu/find/archives/collections/william-yale-papers-1916-1972
Ms. Weir goes on to cite numerous quotations from Yale that prove her assertion unambiguously. In short, the simple dismissal of the point about about Balfour being a quid pro quo for the Zionists to get Palestine is backed up by considerably more weight than basically all of Dr. Unz's article or this one. I don't have William Yale's book however, perhaps it would be worth obtaining it from my University's library to see if he makes citation to original sources.
The The Near East is on Internet Archive: https://archive.org/details/unset0000unse_h5w0
Reading Yale's book it references several other books and contains Original Sources: "Dr. Chaim Weizmann....was able to say as the chariman of an English Zionist conference held on May 20, 1917: 'I am entitled to state in this assembly that His Majesty's Government is ready to support our plans" Citation was History of Zionism by Sokolow. https://archive.org/details/historyofzionism02sokouoft
Re your Item #1, after I read Hoffman's essay, I was about to ask the same question.
However, as to the Creation story, it was not meant to be taken literally. But simple minded people tend to do that. The description of creation has to be taken apart and understood by people with rational minds.
PS: Genesis 1 and 2 (King James version) is one of the finest things I have ever read, no matter how anyone chooses to understand or interpret it.
Adam and Eve didn't have a belly button. Hows that for not being simple minded hmmm? So for you a song:
https://youtu.be/TO8gAvl59Kw
Lemme see...30 million views and 25 thousand comments on a silly song about navels. Right. As to A&E, I don't know what their abdomen looked like. I've never seen them.
Thanks anyway, Gerry... :)
@ Horsea T.
I love Cuttle Fish Horsea. Know why? They glow light and even change colors as they see fit to do. It is one of the most mesmerizing creatures of the deep blue sea. The bio-luminescence of life in the deep blue sea is a wonder to behold. Fascinating beyond belief really.
Next up is the firefly which having the ability to light up is another fascinating creature resembling I must say the very angels of heaven. Butterflies i often refer to as miniature angels. Blow one up to the size of a hulk hogan give it some human qualities and voila an angel! But why am I telling you this?
God isn't stupid!! Adam and Eve weren't naked in the Garden of Eden not originally but rather were themselves clothed in the light of the Creator God. We can know this from a number of different sources which are both biblical and extra-biblical sources. In the book of Daniel 12 we find it written that at the time of the second coming of Christ some, the wise, will shine as bright as the stars of heaven and to find that written should tell us that was the way it was originally with our first parents. They however, lost that covering of light and so became naked before God. Wow, what a loss! Sob.
As for the extra -biblical well next to the above about fireflies etc, a lady named Anton Sawyer in her prophecy Ichabod or Revival she says this as given to her from our Father:
You know what He said? "I'm coming to visit My people and My glory is awesome." I said, "God, I don't understand Your glory." I have a grandson which I absolutely adore. He said, "What do you desire the most?" I said, "I want to love that grandson. I want to hold him and kiss him and love him." "What if I told you My glory was upon you and you couldn't even look at that grandson?" I said, "God, that would be the cruelest thing you could ever do to me because I know I would forget. I would want to touch him.." And that child disintegrated in front of me. God says, "That's what My glory does to sin." God said, "Adam and Eve were in the garden, clothed with My glory. We communed face to face When they sinned the glory fell and I wanted to embrace them but I didn't because My glory would consume them." So God the Father had to back off and Jesus became the way. Jesus stands between us and the Father."
You know, the sun is shining down on this earth. It's got two deadly rays. If they weren't deflected by the earth's atmosphere we would be consumed. If Jesus didn't stand between us and the Father, we would be consumed. But you know what Jesus says? He says, "Bride, I'm getting you ready for glory. I've got to get you purified. I'm going to get you holy because I want to present you to My Father, spotless, that He may touch you, that He may embrace you, that He may hold to His bosom without you being consumed."
i never want to hear the laughable nonsense that Adam and Eve were walking around naked as though God were stupid to even let that happen in full view of not only Himself but the very angels of heaven.
And so for you another 'never taken to be meant literally?'
"It seems that Dr. Unz has no real method to this process of informing himself, dismissing and accepting concepts and facts arbitrarily."
That is exactly correct.
On Freedman, he offers: "When I first encountered these claims a year or two ago, they hardly inspired a great deal of confidence. Freedman was in his 70s at the time of his speech, recounting events that had transpired 45 years earlier, and recollections can easily grow garbled over the decades, with many of his other statements about the First World War being factually incorrect."
Riddled with logical fallacies (e.g. ad hominem) and not one specific rebuttal. Freedman, among other things, cites a dramatic shift in the Jewish media's attitude toward Germany. Unz didn't deal with that.
"The Jews went also as they usually do to the heart of things, and the Executive was attacked. The last and apparently the most unpopular of the presidents, Mr. Wilson, seems to have been wholly in their hands." - Hilaire Belloc (Catholic writer), The Jews p. 202
So much for Unz' claims about the WASP elite controlling President Wilson.
"Meanwhile, what I found most striking in reviewing all of this material was the total lack of any supporting evidence from the American side. Surely if the nefarious Zionists had somehow managed to manipulate America into declaring war against Germany at least some Americans would have become aware of that fact and mentioned it in their writings or private diaries. Yet I found absolutely nothing."
This is an argument from silence, another logical fallacy.
Dear Mr. Hoffman,
I have read most of your writings and I appreciate many aspects of your writings, especially the Talmud Exposures, as they are often very insightful.
However "saint" Paul, was not an Apostle, was hired by the Jewish Pharisee's-with his thugs-to murder Jesus and his followers. His "conversion on the road to Damascus was Total BS to place him in a position of power, backed by the Pharisees and Dark powers in Rome, into the remaining inner circle of Jesus followers to Hijack Jesus Teachings which is exactly what he did. Most Christians, some unknowingly, follow the Demiurge "god" Old Testament teachings and the Murderer/Slaver Paul's teachings. Jesus was/is a Gnostic Essene.
Interesting idea you bring up here. Despite being Christian for nearly twenty years it wasn't until recently that I began to seriously read the Old Testament beyond the first chapters of Genesis (the creation narratives...plural intentional). I was pretty much horrified and asked my wife, a cradle Catholic, if she though we should allow our children to read...the bible. She replied of course not, and asked why I was reading it. I later found out there was a controversy very early in Christian history, long before the canons were codified, regarding Marcion of Sinope who pretty much rejected the Old Testament God as incompatible with the teachings of Jesus. I see the logic to this, as reading the Israelite conquests and thereafter the Sermon on the Mount would seem to be contradictions, or at a minimun, suggest divine schizophrenia. Of course the Gospel accounts we have today have many examples were Jesus says He and the "Heavenly Father" are ONE, and the name Jesus is a play on words referencing Yahweah, meaning supposedly "Yahweah saves." Obviously Christian orthodoxy has adopted the latter logic rather than the former (Marcion), and sought to more or less ignore the logical contradictions which I consider evident. One would think there would be whole volumes on this topic because it is so glaring, but there really aren't. I've read Is God a Moral Monster by Copan and The Lost World of Israelite Conquest by Walton and Walton and even C.S. Lewis on the Psalms (several Psalms like 136 are curses, stating for example "blessed is he who dashes the Babylonian babies on rocks"). Copan and Waltons are both protestant and perform textual historical analysis that tries to demonstrate that really the Israelite conquests were relatively minor and comparatively more civilized that contemporaries and that the Canaanites were really bad cannibal child sacrifice practitioners. Gee...what better way to demonstrate that killing babies is wrong than by killing all the babies of the baby killlers? Guess they can't kill babies now that they have been "utterly destroyed." C.S. Lewis just throws up his hands and states plainly he has no way to make sense of the curse psalms.
What you bring up is novel however. I am aware of Joseph Atwills "Cesar's messiah" which claims that the Romans invented Christianity to undermine Jews, which had a habbit of revolting, and make them into good imperial tax paying citizens, but then why did the Romans martyr so many Christians? It seems to me you are suggesting that the Pharisees installed Paul as a sort of double agent to subvert Christianity from within?
Anthony,
I appreciate your True Insights. Many people have them but are shamed by Religions to not Truly awaken but to believe the utter BS. Crusades, Inquisitions, Body and Blood of Christ (I'm not a cannibal or vampire), Jesus died for our sins-oh yea how did that work out for humanity and Jesus was murdered. Burning at the stake if you are considered a Heretic and if you don't bow down and Worship their Insane, Psychotic, Mass Murdering, Ethnic Cleaning, Mass Child Sacrifice, Jealous "god" who is really an aspect of Satan and a Annunaki Monster Space Alien you go to hell. If you are not one of the "Chosen" you are a Goy sub-human servant, or if you are not a Christian you are going to hell, or if you are not Saved you are going to hell. The Old Testament is mostly this "god's" Biography and the only thing worse is the Torah which it is based on and the Talmud which most of it is utterly disgustingly Psychotic. Mr. Hoffman's book on the Talmud is excellent Exposure. The New Age nonsense is another trap as is atheism, a religious belief in "science". Alcohol, drugs, gambling and P*** are Huge traps. These "gods" have had their way for thousands of years, are and have been fighting for ultimate Supremacy and look where it got us.
There are trapped Sparks of Light from the True Divine Rescuers such as the True: Moses, Zoroaster, Elijah, Jesus, Mother Mary, Manicheas, Shiva, Sawaswati, and such sparsely incorporated into the Bible and the other religious books to attract those of Good heart and trap them in the Psychotic "gods" clutches. The True Divine Mother/Father God knows each Spirit and does not want to be worshiped, does not want sacrifices but just wants you to hold on to your Will and Connect to the True Divine.
I'll delve deeper on the weekend!
Thank you,
Albert
"The True Divine Mother/Father God knows each Spirit and does not want to be worshiped, does not want sacrifices but just wants you to hold on to your Will and Connect to the True Divine."
Easier said than done! But true nonetheless.
Is there such a word as conférés or did you maybe mean "confrères"? Or could "conférés" be a sort of useful made-up word meaning "persons conferred with"? From conférer (to confer).
Dear Horsea T.
Conférés is not a neologism. It is a French word.
I should have typed "c-o-n-f-rè-r-e-s" (denoting colleagues), instead of c-o-n-f-é-r-é-s (denoting the verb, to confer).
A mistake; thank you for spotting it and bringing it to my attention.
(Excuse my using the reply space; my primitive device doesn’t allow me into the comment space.)
To start with quotes from Michael: “Our nation follows the Word of the Talmud into servitude, and rejects the Word of God. What could go wrong?
“Biden is president, the southern border is massively invaded, the media is captive to the Khazars, our children, if they survive the mass movement to murder them in the womb, grow up to be mentally imprisoned by woke ideology…”
“This is our own doing. We have volunteered for ignorance, rebellion, subjection, and captivity.” (Rev. Hist. Bulletin #4)
In “Judaism Discovered,” you can read about the Rules (Halachos) of Manslaughter on p. 477. On p. 478, you can read about the policy of Amalek and the wiping out of genes, which is genocide. On p. 483, you can read about the divine mandate to kill Jesus Christ and Christians. This is all part of the Talmud. That we have let the mental virus of the talmud infect all of our American institutions—government, legal, education, church, media—ensures that we have “dug the graves of our children.” (MH)
And Mr. Unz: “But political power is largely based on the perception of political power, so ideological movements always have an obvious incentive to exaggerate their influence and past successes” (quoted from the article above). Thus we have the eternal deception, dissimulation, hoodwinking, and the continuous memory hole of what might have been our true history, but for the efforts of the few truth seekers.
“Outrageous!!” says Netanyahu over the ICJ ruling. “Hague Schmague” says Ben-Givr.
Thank you always Michael Hoffman and also Ron Unz. St. Paul told us about the veil we wear over our eyes.
In honor of my God-father at baptism, Franz Enslinger, an Austrian boy inducted into Hitler’s army and left for dead on the Russian Front (for a description of this slaughter, see Hoffman’s book on Adolf Hitler), I’ll give a quote from this book, p. 166.
“A self-imploding boobytrap devised by the virus of Kabbalism: Every kabbalistic creed must subvert the Bible, either through nullification (rabbinic Judaism and Freemasonry), distortion (renaissance “Catholicism”) or outright overthrow (Communism, Nazism and modernism).”
The 21st century’s great “crime” is telling the truth; the (usurious) cost of honesty is so very high, and before our numbed and silenced being a great “genocide by fake news” (Dr. Vernon Coleman) is happening, right now, all around us in the West. And we will see our children sacrificed.
Mr. Hoffman’s writing always brings Dante’s Divine Comedy to mind, so let me quote from Dorothy Sayers on Canto XVIII, her commentary: “In the Circles of Fraud (the abuse of the God-given faculty of reason) the ministers of Hell are no longer mere embodied appetites, but actual devils, images of the perverted intellect. … The image is a sexual one; but the Panders and Seducers allegorically figure the stimulation and exploitation of every kind of passion — e.g. rage or greed — by which one may make tools of other people.”
Making tools of other people. “Their especial weapon is that abuse and corruption of language which destroys communication between mind and mind.” TV. Internet.
Michael Hoffman: “ The mortal sin of idolatry” — the “tincture in the blood” of tyranny — “the slough of self deception”. I pray to our precious Lord Jesus that we may learn again how to read.
O ye dead awaken.
Katya is one of the closest readers of my work, a fact for which I am grateful.
You're welcome.
Hey, every comment section on the interwebz needs a korinthenkacker. So, I stepped up to the plate. :)
“Meanwhile, what I found most striking in reviewing all of this material was the total lack of any supporting evidence from the American side. Surely if the nefarious Zionists had somehow managed to manipulate America into declaring war against Germany at least some Americans would have become aware of that fact and mentioned it in their writings or private diaries. Yet I found absolutely nothing.
Wow, what a great piece I enjoyed reading it thoroughly but I'm terribly puzzled because of some information i have in front of me here. It comes from a book entitled The Day the Dollar Dies by Dr. Willard Cantelon date of publication 1973 Logos International.. Note that Dr. Cantelon was Oxford trained, held a distinguished chair there and was an advisor to U.S. Presidents and was at all of the important meetings internationally covering the unfolding events politically in banking especially throughout the world. The history he reveals blows me away and yet when I read essays as this one above I'm like huh what? Further to this to read that Run Unz balks at the notion America funded Hitler is absurd to the extreme and he dismisses it outright again I go huh, what?
I take Hitler to be little more than a useful idiot who was set up by the International Bankers. Here is a quote an extensive one at that to regarding some missing pieces. From pages 44-66:
And in underground vaults five stories below Wall Street reside more than a hundred thousand gold bars worth well over a billion dollars. But though this gold is on American soil, it is not ours. It bears the stamps of the central banks of any one of seventy foreign countries. But in spite of the physical guard placed on the gold at Fort Knox and in the sub-basements of the New York banks, America's gold steadily drained away. If the gold could speak, it might impart quite a story of the miles it had traveled from country to country and from one hand to another. .At the height of her power, Britain took much of the gold from the Spanish. The Spanish took it from the colonies that they invaded. At the close of World War I, when the leaders of the Western world met in the beautiful Hall of Mirrors to sign the Treaty of Versailles, Germany was compelled to deliver up all the gold she possessed in the Reich Bank of the nation. It would not be long, however, before much of America's gold would move back again to Germany and to western Europe.
ln 1934, when legislation was passed prohibiting the American public from owning gold currency, the door was left wide open to the foreign holders of American dollars to claim gold in exchange for their paper. But even before this international stage was set, Representative Louis T. McFadden (R-Pa.), Chairman of the Committee on Banking and Currency, made statements on June 10 of 1932 which indicated America's gold was already moving back to Europe. His statements were recorded in the Congressional Record and pages 140-174 in H. S. Kenan's book entitled The Federal Reserve Bank. Representative McFadden speaks of those on the other side of the water with a strong banking "fence getting the currency of theFederal Reserve Banks-exchanging that currency for gold and transmitting the gold to the foreign confederates."
McFadden named the dates on which America's gold was shipped to Germany:
On April 27, 1932, $750 thousand in gold was sent to Germany. One week later another $300 thousand in gold was shipped to Germany the same way. In the middle of May of that year, $12 million in gold was shipped to Germany. . . .Almost every week there was a shipment of gold to Germany-these shipments are not made for profit.
Representative McFadden referred also to the comments of Senator Elihu Root:
Long before we wake up from our dreams of prosperity through an inflated currency, our gold which could have kept us from catastrophe will have vanished, and no rate of interest will tempt it to return.
In his report to Congress, Louis McFadden asked the question,
Why should our depositors and our government be forced to flnance the munition factories of Germany and Soviet Russia?
Representative McFadden continued,
Gold was taken from the entrusting American people and was sent to Europe. In the last several months $1,300,000,000 in gold has been sent to Europe every dollar of that gold once belonged to the people of United States and was unlawfully taken from them.
As I weighed the words of Louis McFadden and other lawmakers, I also witnessed the fantastic scene of America's vanishing gold. The record was unbelievable:
1949 - $24,500,000,000
1958 - $21 ,593,000,000
1959 -$20,478,483,000
1960- $19,420,997,000
196L - $ 17,667,587,000
1962-$.15,997 ,647,000
1965-$13,733,000,000
On and on the gold drain went, unabated. Then came the crisis in the spring of 1968. We were living in Europe at that particular time. On March 14, hysterical crowds of people crowded, screamed, and scrambled their ways to the windows of the banks of England, and to the bank windows of the sub-basements of Paris to exchange their paper for gold. On one single day, the crude and the cultured, the peer and the peasant, carried off 200 tons of the precious metal. They stored it in secret places of their homes and deposited it in various banks in strongboxes labeled with fictitious names.
On that day Senator Everett Dirksen in conversation with Secretary of the Treasury Fowler, William McChesney Martin, and a dozen other senators said,
We have reached the bottom of the barrel.
It seemed like only yesterday when I spoke on monetary matters when America had $26 billion in gold in her treasuries. By June 30 of 1971, it had been reduced to $10.5 billion. stop quote
So hows that for an interesting piece of history and why?
Have you every heard of or read "Iron Curtain over America" by John Beaty (1951) or Allison Weir's "Against our Better Judgement" (2014)?
Hello Anthony ,
Unfortunately, no, but given the title and what I've read in others places its not something new or unknown to me. Dr. Cantelon has a chapter Man Made Solutions, Communism and the UN. Imagine the architect of the UN was none other than Alger Hiss: Here's an interesting paragraph::
Russia was spending more than a billion dollars on literature and propaganda outside of the USSR each year. The doctrines of socialism were not only being taught in the classrooms of the colleges, but were also being heard from the pulpits of many churches, and from the pens of religious leaders.
I wonder, I said to myself, how many Americans have studied the charter of the UN sufficiently to realize that commits each member nation to a program of total socialism for itself and for all other nations. Alger Hiss was a major architect of the UN charter and served as the
secretary general of the San Francisco conference for the organization of the United Nations. Twenty-flve years later, U Thant was quoted praising Lenin, as a political leader whose ideas were reflected in the United Nations' charter. close quote page 102
So there you have everything one needs to know really. But for me none of it matters because something far, far more important and significant is on the horizon and O if only Dostoevsky were around to see what is unfolding. He would have written the definitive work on the subject given that world famous quote of his about we are working not with thee but with him for who can control men if not he holds there bread and conscience in its hands. That would be the CBDC and the question I'm asking is the QR Code the mark that St. john saw two thousand years ago? Imagine if Dostoevsky were around today i bet he would be saying it sure looks that way!!! Scripture says doesn't it 'HERE IS THE MIND THAT HAS WISDOM" Rev. 13 this was the thesis of Dr. Cantelon's work trying to gain the knowledge of where money came from and where it will ultimately end and how. His entire thesis was actually summed up by a commentator Asia Teacher:
"In a world of digital currencies, governments will finally control individual wealth. Communism by the back door."
The curtain of St. Matthew 25 is about to go up and not a day goes by wherein I don't say too myself is this day the antichrist arrives? I do believe it is in the shadows now working its final majic. Think well on the parable of the 10 virgins and be one of the wise to endure to the end and be saved Anthony.
Cheers
And have a song in ones heart,
https://youtu.be/rcqLmE1vguY
well lots of songs actually! I love especially love this one:
https://youtu.be/se4cgYFaVas
Additionally here's a juicy morsel to dig ones teeth into as well:
from pages 65-67
Some of the strongest words that came to my attention were those of Curtis B. Dall, written in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, on April 1968, as an introduction to H. S. Kenan's book on the Federal Reserve Bank. In reference to the international bankers, Mr. Dall writes,
They are driving toward complete control of the world's long-range monetary policy and principal
world markets for their own profit. They foment foreign wars to aid this objective.
It did not take a brilliant mathematician long to prove with simple arithmetic that war debts allowed to continue would soon burden the people of the world with such indebtedness that it would take most of the earning power of the masses simply to pay the compounding interest. Was it possible, I asked myself repeatedly, that men could so crave power that they would be willing to sacrifice millions of lives to the god of war in order to achieve their goals? If it were true, were they so deluded or deceived that they justified the mass slaughter of the innocent as a socalled stepping-stone to a better world they were seeking to build? Regardless of the questions, or their answers, here was one certain fact: the world was swiftly moving toward centralized government and universal control. The
General Assembly of the United Nations frequently echoed with accusations and dissension. But there was one power that seemed even stronger than man's endless legislation. It was the power of money. Whoever controlled it, controlled man's destiny. The path toward world control seemed to be indeed a divided highway. On one side, there were the shadowy personalities representing the high priests of finance, who visualized the wealth of the world in few hands-their hands. On the other side of the road, there were a number of men, honest and sincere, who pointed out that the total commitment to a world government was man's only hope of escaping a nuclear holocaust. Or famine from exploding populations, or poison from pollution..
Checks Obsolete
Members of the Federal Reserve warned that the nations' banks could strangle on the 22 billion checks the Americans wrote each year, pointing out that in a hundred months the number of checks would double. They urged the adoption of a computer system which would automatically transfer funds between bank accounts. A person's pay would automatically be credited to his bank account by his employer, without the writing of a check. And the regular payments which the worker owed-car payments, rent, etc. -would automatically be sent to his creditors' accounts when due. George Mitchell of the Federal Reserve declared it was most urgent to reform the checking system before the economy smothered under a pile of paper. I did not know George Mitchell personally, but I did know many honest and sincere bankers who shared his sentiments. There was Carlos Verheek of the Kredietbank
of Belgium, and Banker Keller of Germany.
Mountains of Paper
As I sat with Banker Keller in his Stuttgart office, I heard him heave a weary sigh. "We are being buried under paper," he said sadly. From the doorway of his office I could see the lines of people standing impatiently before the bank tellers. I knew that back home our government was spending $350,000 a minute. The welfare program alone was costing the taxpayers more than a billion dollars a month' In a
four year period, the federal budget had increased 84% and in five years the money supply 47%
ln America, I had talked with my banker friends' Without exception every banker realized we were coming to the end of an old regime and the dawn of a new era' Our early an-cestors had-used shells, iron, cotton' or cattle as a medium of exchange Then gold' Now, the paper currencies were becoming as antiquated as all of the obsolete systems that man had used. A new system was about to dawn over the entire world and it would be a number system' made possible by the birth of the computer in 1946.' close quote
It seems to me one has to understand monetary history to really understand historical events. I light of that imagine it was a Dr. Carrol Quigley who after being given access to the International Bankers secret papers and records came of the opinion that they were the hope of the world? Further to this i find it odd to have comes across where I no longer remember where but a quote that they never thought that the worlds wars would take on such a bloody murderous tone as they did? To that its hard to believe a man like Hitler who saw the trench warfare of WW1 and was hardened by it all hes the one that became Chancellor? A corporal as Rommel insulted him later? My quest though has always been a question that continues to bother me to this day. Christians murdering Christians?
and with that are these final words form Dr. Cantelon:
WORLD GOVERNMENT
I sat in Brussels in March, 1972, with my friend, Dave Oliver, who had devoted 28 years of his life to tirelessly working with the Atomic Energy Commission. In recalling the first atomic bomb dropped on Hiroshima on August 6, 1945, we were impressed that it was the voice signal of the U.S. President, Harry Truman, that released that bomb from the B-29 that flew over Hiroshima on that memorable
day. With knowledge of that amazing incident, we turned in the prophetic Scriptures to the prophecies of John in the book of Revelation. Here the prophet not only spoke of a one-world government, canceling the old monetary currencies of the past and establishing a new number system, the prophet also spoke of a world leader, having authority over, the military power of the world, and declared,
Power was given him over all kindreds, and tongues, and nations [and he adds], He maketh fire come down from heaven on the earth in the sight of men. (Rev. l3:7, 13)
If a man became head of a world government and possessed such power, surely it would be greater than what any man in history had ever possessed before him.
What would happen if such power was invested in a man who should turn into a maniac like Adolph Hitler? Was there such a danger? Of course there was, and most sober minded leaders of government realized it. But man seemed to be caught between two undesirable alternatives. The old paths behind him pointed back to Hiroshima, Nagasaki, and 50 million dead from World War I[. The other path offered the forfeiture of rights by individuals and nations being pushed daily nearer to a form of world government.
Grenville Clark said,
Perhaps it may take a few nuclear bombs and several million deaths.
And Joseph Clark added,
The people will follow when the leaders tell them there is no alternative.
Messiansim? Only in the Bible do we find the mentioning of a Messiah but alas what we will see first of all is the Abomination of Desolation. So were back to those words "Who do the people say that I am."
Cheers
Well, wow. To me it looks as if you have summarized Modernity exterminating itself, the reign of Quantity and the measure of the worth of all things in Money, which in our world is a force of Sterility. Read Hoffman’s “Usury in Christendom” to get a start on figuring out where all the gold is going — hint: it may not have to do with the world you can touch. Has to do with hearts that cannot be found in autopsies. (Read the story of St. Anthony)
And of course, there’s always Dostoevsky who has answers for all of this in all of his books. “Crime and Punishment” has special things to say about money —
E adesso basta e grazie tanto Michael. Buona notte tutti.
Thank you, Katya. The only point I wanted to make was that Hitler was one of those useful idiot that the International Bankers stringed along. Beyond that we didn't know how to fight the good fight of faith and those that did largely lost their lives to the power of money. I'm reminded of the words of Abraham Lincoln on this point:
In 1863, Lincoln said,
I see in the near future a crisis approaching that unnerves me, and causes me to tremble for the safety of my country"...money power will endeavor to prolong its reign....until wealth is aggregated into few hands and the republic is destroyed.
Yes usury is the name of the game and its not rocket science Katya and reading Hoffman on usury took me back 2 decades to what i heard and learned on the subject about some kings of England who were against it. Here for your info the page on it and lets have some fun shall we:
The Power of Interest
The brilliance of Edison and the honesty of Abraham Lincoln caused each of them to speak out firmly against the dangers of national debts and compound interest. They knew that the history of the Western world for 1,694 years had forbidden the taking of usury. King Alfred the Great in 901 declared,
If any man is found taking usury, his lands will be confiscated, and he will be banished from England.
In 1215, King John echoed the same announcement as Alfred, and as late as King James in 1566, the king declared,
If a man is found taking usury, his lands will be confiscated. It is like taking a man's life, and it must not
be tolerated.
I recalled one evening in Portland, Oregon, when I picked up a copy of the book entitled The Chronology of Money written by Wickliffe B. Vennard. In illustrating the power of compounded interest, Vennard suggested that if one penny had been deposited in the year A.D. I at 6% compounded interest, by 1895, that penny would have had an accrued value of $8,497,840 decillion! The figure so staggered my imagination, I could not comprehend it. Later that night, somewhere
between midnight and dawn, I pushed back a ream of paper and concluded wearily that this man spoke the truth. For hours I had worked with pen in hand, proving to my own satisfaction that his statement was not an overstatement. Naturally, one could not comprehend the magnitude of one decillion dollars, but if it were illustrated with symbolism that could be understood, one decillion dollars would be equal to 610 quadrillion worlds of solid gold. And what would that mean? The world, I had learned in early life, weighed 6,600 billion times a billion tons. Naturally no one would consider banking a penny with the thought of leaving it almost two millennia. But many a man could face more realistically a debt that would double in approximately 12 years, or be a thousandfold greater in a century, at the approximate rate of 6% compounded interest. John Maynard Keynes, who wrote on the power of interest, referred to the $200,000 in gold that Sir Francis Drake gave to Queen Elizabeth, gold that he had taken from the Spanish on the high seas. This mattered little, because they had only taken it from the inhabitants of Mexico or South America. Keynes reviewed the fact that Queen Elizabeth made Francis Drake a knight for bringing home the gold, which later became part of the investment
in the East India Trading Company.
"By 1930," said Keynes, "every dollar that Drake had brought to England would have grown in value to a hundred thousand dollars under a rate of 3 3/4% compounded interest."
But of what concern is this to us in our day? Lawrence R. Klein wrote in The Keynesian Revolution regarding national debt,
An internally held public debt can never be a burden because we owe it to ourselves.
No burden-because we owe it to ourselves? I asked myself slowly. Is $500 per second not a burden on the taxpayers? For every tick of the clock, Americans must pay in taxes over $500 in interest on a national debt that is over $400 billion. Not a burden? Is it not a burden to pay over $ I 1/4 billion every 30 days in taxes on interest on a national debt? pages 32-33 Cantelon
Nice eh? Katya?
By the way from Thomas Edison:
In 1847, he was bitterly opposed to the policy of issuing bonds. he said,
If our nation can issue a dollar bond, it can issue a dollar bill. the element that makes the bond good, makes the bill good also. The difference between the bond and the bill is that the the bond lets the money brokers collect twice the amount of the bond.
When the government in his day wanted to borrow $30 million to develop the mucle Shoals Project, Edison said,
It is stupid to borrow $30 million, and have to pay moneylenders $ 66 million for the use of the money.
Edison was convinced that global -socialism would be brought about by the creation of debt and interest perpetrated on the nations by the international moneylenders. Close quote page 30 Cantelon
For any interested imagine the level of wealth of just one banking family?
The House of Rothschild
Meyer Amschel Rothschild (1743-1812) of Frankfurt, Germany, studied originally to be a rabbi. Later, however, he turned his interests to finance and, with his five sons, established the famous banking house in Frankfurt. Four of the sons were later sent to Vienna, London, Paris, and Naples to set up branches of their family bank. This combine soon became the most powerful banking establishment
of Europe. Amschel Rothschild, the eldest son, remained with his father in Frankfurt and became the
treasurer of the German Confederation. Salomon, the second son, founder of the Vienna branch, became a leading personality in the Austro-Hungarian Empire. Nathan, the third son, founder of the London branch, became the rnost powerful man in English finance. Carl, the fourth son, founder of the Naples branch, became one of the most powerful men in Italy. James (Jacob), the fifth son, founder of the Paris branch, soon dominated the financial destiny of France. BY 1850, THE HOUSE OF ROTHSCHILD'S REPRESENTED MORE WEALTH THAN ALL THE ROYAL FAMILIES OF EUROPE AND BRITAIN COMBINED.
International Bankers
The House of Warburg, the House of Rothschild, the few other powerful banking houses became known as "the international bankers." They are described best by Dr. Carroll Quigley who taught at Princeton and Harvard. He did research in the archives of France, Italy, and England and authored several widely read books. When Dr. Quigley decided to write Tragedy and Hope (Macmillan, 1966), he knew he would be exposing one of the best-kept secrets in the world. Regarding the international bankers, Dr. Quigley states,
They remained different from ordinary bankers in distinctive ways: (1) they were cosmopolitan and international; (2) they were close to governments and were particularly concerned with questions of government debts; (3) their interests were almost exclusively in bonds and very rarely in goods; (4) they were, accordingly, fanatical devotees of inflation; (5) they were almost equally devoted to secrecy and the secret use of financial influence in political life. These bankers came to be called the international bankers.
Wow, how much of the world is indebted to them? Further with so much wealth i often wonder about a possible robinhood moment. i mean really what better way for Satan to gather to itself the world than to pull off a robinhood type event? To redistribute the wealth of the world will most assuredly cause it to become a kind of savior or even a god in the eyes of all but for that blessing you will have to do what? Take the mark ala Big Brother and worship it as it said to our savior Christ Jesus?
So something to think about? and Dr. Carroll Quigley after having gone threw they're secret papers refereed to them as the hope of the world? DEBT? Wow, imagine the kind of wealth they must be sitting on? More wealth than all of the royal families combined? WHEW?
Gerry, thanks for all this. It shows you aren’t indifferent, as it is far worse to be uncaring, as Rene Guenon (Crisis of Modernity) says.
For Lincoln, may I recommend a new book from Shotwell Press entitled “Nonsense on Stilts: The Gettysburg Address & Lincoln’s Imaginary Nation.” Might tell you what I think of that indoctrination.
And then let me recommend Larry Romanov’s wonderful and lengthy article on UNZ.com entitled “The Richest Man in the World”, and another one on the effects of materialism on American youth — these will be archived under Romanov’s name on Ron Unz’s site. Great reading.
And lastly, back to Michael Hoffman’s books and newsletters: mind boggling research on the effects of the occult (Neoplatonic Hermeticism) on our “economy” (Greek for balance of the household) starting way back just before what we call the Renaissance, which Guenon calls the beginning of the modern period of death. Michael has done incredible work on the math and sorcery of John Dee (007) during Elizabeth I’s reign and the Consolidation of the British Empire. Remember that our giant of profane science was Isaac Newton, whose chest of Hermetic (occult, sorcerous) writings was discovered in the attic of the Royal Society by John Maynard Keynes (a Malthusian, by the way). It’s an unreal world we live in, marked by a hallucinated financial system that has sold our children into slavery. Please look over Michael Hoffman’s oeuvre and read it. ‘‘Tis mind blowing. We are so spellbound, we smart moderns.
Hello Katya
Again thank you. Yes to Romanov. I read that piece some time ago over at the Saker.is blog. Not too much new to me but in reflection about such massive wealth three things jump out at me the first of course they started out as Rabbi's. If that doesn't tell one everything one needs to know really. Warburg to began his career as a Rabbi. And this all from Germany? Second would be Rothschild sets up shop where globally? Great Britain? His palatial palace in the North of England I believe is impressive? Third thing however, is coming from a Rabbinical past I kind of feel sorry for them or perhaps a better word is pity. Why so? Well put yourself in they're shoes and how hard it must be to sit on such massive wealth and power and yet you can't get what you really want from life and what is that exactly? The rebuilding of the Third Temple in Jerusalem and the reconstitution of a nation. No wonder the violence over the Balfour Declaration! One can only imagine being a fly on a wall in the mans study? Reminds me of the words of God to Samuel about being shut out from God when they cry out to him for relief from they're king and all of his taxes lol!!! Wait forever they will if they don't go to that place we Christians know very well. What was Christs words? You will never see me again until you say blessed is he who comes in the name of the Lord. And that occurs when? When they wake up and realize yikes the antichrist is actually an impostor as they run for the mountains and caves!
Britain? Wasn't it Churchill who said, 'you can trust America to do what is right after she has tried everything else.'
Cheers
PS. Here's a juicy morsel of info which Romanov knows nothing about:
In an edition of the Los Angeles Times in April, 1973, Murray Seeger tells how the government leaders in Russia seek to control men's minds and spirits. He describes the heavy volume of anti-religious action and propaganda which have been continued in all parts of Russia against
many different faiths ever since the Bolshevik Revolution took place 55 years ago.
In light of the Communist attitude toward Christians and Jews, are men not justified in asking why this government should receive favored treatment?
Why should American taxpayers pay $300 million in taxes to subsidize cheap wheat for the USSR? Or why should Russia get 200,000 tons of butter from The European Common Market for 20 cents per pound, when the British pay 60 cents for the same butter?
Perhaps some of the international bankers might shed some light on this. They might tell us how the Communist banks were able to borrow 40 billion Eurodollars six months before the dollar was devalued 10% on February 6th of 1973 and comment on the extraordinary good
fortune of their timing. For when this debt is repaid, it will be repaid with dollars valued at 90 cents which means a net profit of $4 billion for the borrowers.
Only one thing is clear wrote one economist from Europe "and that is the mystery that surrounds these strange actions." Cantelon pages 112-113
By the way did you happen to see this today?
https://leohohmann.substack.com/p/ukraine-sells-its-soul-to-the-wefers
Ukraine the test case for Rev. 13? and Cantelon circa 1973 ?!?!?!?!
Who Will Control the Money?
Communist or capitalist, banker or president of the nation, all men seemed to agree that those who controlled the finance of a nation represented a power greater than any other legislative body.
I recalled an afternoon in Brussels when I addressed an international group in the Metropole Hotel. Apart from John Bains of the Brussels-Phoenix Press, the audience were strangers to me. Most of the men present held high office in various departments and were favorably disposed toward the new system on which I was to speak. I concluded my luncheon address by saying,
"Gentlemen, you look with approval upon this coming new order and the new system it will bring. You believe it has the answers to some of the frustrations and unanswered problems of the present moment, but I, in all sincerity, would like to ask you one basic question before leaving you today: who will control it?"
A hush fell over the room. I looked from face to face in search of an answer. On one side sat a four-star general, on the other, an attorney. None offered to speak.
"Perhaps," I said, "you feel that none of us has the answer to this question: Who will hold in his hand your future in this new international government with its new world money system? But there is an answer. It is spelled out clearly by a man who lived 2,000 years ago and described these very days."
Opening my Bible, I read once again the familiar words of John, the prophet, who wrote concerning a world government and its leader who would hold power over all kindreds, and tongues, and nations . . . and causeth all, both small and great, rich and poor, free and bond, to receive a mark in their right hand, or in their foreheads: And that no man might buy or sell, save he that had that mark . . . or the number. (Rev. l3:7, 16-17)
pages 58-59
Watching what was written thousands of years come to fruition is simply stunning isn't it?
O, what are we going to wake up to tomorrow?
I believe the robinhood moment you’re referring to is slowly happening now and called the Great Awakening, MAGA.
Anthony,
Let's focus on Judaism and Christianity for now:
Much of the Old Testament Clearly being the Biography of the Psychotic Demiurge/Satan god, it is self-evident, and if we do not Bow Down to and Worship this Extreme Psychopath then he will hit us and our with Fire and Brimstone. He Commands many-many times that entire towns be attacked, men-women-children-animals be slaughtered and burned so he can smell the delicious aroma and in some cases he wanted a large share of the spoils including virgins-children and cattle because he is a corporeal being (has a body).
There is very little of the True Christ in Christianity, enough to draw in many good people, but most is the worship and obedience to the "god" noted above.
Consider "saint" Paul, who was no saint and not an Apostle, but an assassin for the Jewish Pharisees. He hijacked many of Jesus True teachings to the ridiculousness of the New Testament:
Ephesians 6 1
Slaves, obey your earthly masters with respect and fear, and with sincerity of heart, just as you would obey Christ.
Clearly Paul is a Slavers Henchman.
Best Always,
Albert
Dear Michael
I temporarily paused my account for personal reasons but had the privilege to read this, one of your most interesting short writings.
One question. How do you reconcile your belief that, “It is Yahweh who chooses who will believe in Him and who will not.” With, Fate, which is a pagan Greek concept? I always believed that the gift of free-will disallows this.
Dear Ricky Hunt
Read the Book of Romans, chapters 7, 8, and 9 carefully; particularly chapter 8.
Thank you for the article sir, reminds me of the hymn and parable on Christ the solid rock I stand all other ground is sinking sand and James 1:5
"But if any of you lacks wisdom, let him ask of God, who gives to all generously and without reproach, and it will be given to him."
If I'm not mistaken I saw an interview you did with David Irving, talk about heavy weight historians in one room!