13 Comments

FS clearly approves blessing SS couples. This will be used to legitimate these unions. The media will push this interpretation. Unless there’s a revolt against this, the result will be tantamount to SS marriage in the Catholic Church.

Expand full comment

Thank you for a well reasoned and evidenced clarification. I wonder if EMJ has a to do list of tasks legitimising genocide (war, ethnic cleansing AND the Convid Bioweapons) and non-binary gender nonsense. Usury and sodomy ticked off already.

Expand full comment

No doubt this is a major step to full-out “marriage” of sodomitic couples. A good video here:

https://youtu.be/h9yyM0OuFKo?si=HvxbNqCOlnzbyOjd

Expand full comment

I stand with Mr. Hoffman on this one. On a side note, it's becoming more difficult to be a Catholic in modernity when identity crisis is one of the more prominent religions. Satan has a stronghold in America. I'll see you at mass. Take care.

Expand full comment
Jan 18Liked by Michael Hoffman

EMJ has employed similar sophistry for years. The debate with Davies on whether the SSPX was in schism is another prime example. How is it that Jones can criticize Nostra Aetate but FS is somehow beyond reproach and criticizing it amounts to schism? He loses credibility in his criticism of Jews if he runs cover for church support of things for which he condemns the Jews. How can Jones claim to care about the Catholic Church when his stances continue to destroy the very thing he claims to love as he makes appeals to honoring tradition/authority?

Expand full comment

Apostasy is a cancer to the Western branch of God's Church and was evident even from its beginning. I don't believe the apostle Peter ever traveled to Rome or was its first bishop (or "pope") or was ever buried there. In his letter to the seven churches in Asia, before his death, the apostle John even referred to it as "Babylon" (Rev 17:5). His own disciples, Polycarp and Polycrates, even traveled to Rome to defend the Paschal tradition he transmitted to them, meeting Anicetus and Victor respectively, and sought to rectify the opposing apostate traditions that were gaining ground in the West, and which possibly had their origins with Pope Sixtus. Regrettably their attempts at reform in Rome were unsuccessful, hence it's not entirely unexpected that the Church of Rome has continued on its pernicious path of apostasy to our day with its sanctioning of a plethora of sins be it usury or sodomy. The apostle John even foresaw our day so clearly and the increasing rejection of God the Father and His Son, the Messiah, on a global scale when he wrote that, "Neither repented they of their murders, nor of their sorceries, nor of their fornication, nor of their thefts" (Rev 9:21). And Christ followers have born witness to the truth of his words with the rising rates all over the world in unlawful killings, drug use and abuse, sexual immorality and stealing in all its corrupt forms. These same class of anti-Christs who refused to reform their ways John would later describe as being excluded from the heavenly Jerusalem: "For without are dogs, and sorcerers, and whoremongers, and murderers, and idolaters, and whosoever loveth and maketh a lie" (Rev 22:15). The same Greek word in this verse for "dogs" ("kyon" 2965) is also used in the Greek Septuagint in Deuteronomy 23:18 to refer to sodomites. Indeed, what we've been seeing more of in recent times are "Christians," particularly those with power and money, seducing those among us with their antinomian lies and deceit to remain asleep while they tread that wide and broad path of self-destruction: "And for this cause God shall send them strong delusion, that they should believe [the] lie: That they all might be damned who believed not the truth, but had pleasure in unrighteousness" (2 Thess 2:11-12).

Expand full comment

We always liked the incisive intelligent Michael Hoffman and found t over time ,vexatiously, that we instantly suspected emj. of being a company man,defrocked Catholic on a leash or not.We politely are not Roman Catholic,we are non sectarian Slavic Christians and find it very healthy to find such a chorus of correct criticism of emj.We find Jones to have some Christian truths,some good points on the Synagogue of Satan but we consistently find an autocratic dogma based mentality with E.M.J. We instantly enjoyed and benefitted from discovering and reading more from Michael Hoffman..admittedly..we had no idea he has waged

for quite some time..a detailed incisive good war contra the many errors and obvious wrong assertions of EMJ. .The blasphemous blessing of homosexual unions and soft on faggotry mindset from EMJ was more than enough for us to step away from too much interest in EMJ.The last thing the world needs is more bait and switch conformistic advocates of autocracy ...that s at the end of the day..what we get from EMJ.. All best Mr Hoffman.

Expand full comment

Magisterial Michael Hoffman has great sensitivity scholarship and exquisite reasoning abilities.He is not flat minded or. a shrieking old neo universalist or neo socialist like anti 2A e.m.jones.We hope to read much more of Magisterial Michael Hoffman

s elegant incisive analysis ..critiques....repartee s...vis a vis the glaring errors..unesecery , dogma s....foibles and other gross oversights of e.m.jones..We have no problem with logos...gnosos..or e.m.jones basically correct view of the current iteration of the Synagogue Of Satan...it's his *my way or the highway* idiotic absolute but obviously limited view of history..and many other subjects which conversely..Tom Sunic

rather consistently makes.m.jones look like ..Arnold the turtle*..So .has it come to this.......e.m.jones is soft on

globohomosexual Jews now?...

Expand full comment