The appropriation of Conservative Populism by Israeli partisans

Is there a Moral Obligation to denounce anti-Gentilism?

RevisionistHistory.org

If someone were to ask me with whom do I conduct the most fruitful exchange of information and research, I would be a liar if I did not respond by saying that it is the Historical Research Department of the Nation of Islam (NOI).

I’m also in communication with scholars around the non-white world, many of them hungry for information and eager to learn with an enthusiasm unmatched.

In the so-called “West” meanwhile, there is some exchange on occasion, but little in comparison with the researchers in the developing world.

I will occasionally be contacted by obviously fearful western academics, who, with considerable trepidation, impel themselves to ask questions, or assist by offering certain facts not previously in my possession. Almost always the exchange is conducted with a request for “strictest confidence.”

I hear from former colleagues in the Establishment media from time to time. These include reporters for the New York Times and one Pulitzer Prize winner. All of their correspondence, they tell me, is “off the record.” I keep faith with that provision, but I preserve the correspondence in my files nonetheless.

Because I am a Christian controversialist I exchange information with priests and ministers. In only two cases, that of Pastor Chuck Baldwin, and Pastor Douglas Wilson, have there been no limits placed on publicizing our correspondence; whereas with other Christian clerics, it’s on the “q.t.”

With the exception of Chuck Baldwin, none of this correspondence can compete in volume with the work I share with Minister Louis Farrakhan’s Nation of Islam scholars, a fraternal arrangement in place since the ‘90s. The generosity of those learned men, as well as their investigative acumen and indefatigable search for hidden history, is inspiring and encouraging.

When I acknowledge the truth that I exchange documentation and views with the Historical Research Department of the Nation, I become a pariah in the eyes of most leaders of Right-wing Churchianity, as well as most white “Conservatives,” and all partisans of the entity that misrepresents itself as “the State of Israel.”

These detractors are not interested in what particulars I exchange, what I learn in return, or how much my research is advanced by my relationship with the NOI. The bigots automatically assume that it is all slime from the tarpits of protozoic primitivism and must be denounced by CorrectThinkers.

What to do? Continue my collaboration with black nationalist intellectuals, or gradually withdraw under various pretexts, so as to try and rebuild my reputation in the eyes of Wikipedia, the thought police NGOs, and fellow Christians?

In my case, it was curiosity that killed the cat: I am far too curious about suppressed history and the contents of recondite religious and occult texts to rebuff anyone who is sharing valuable data in those areas. I can’t help myself. I have to know.

I’d rather attempt to know, than do almost anything else. For 20 years I’ve lived 200 miles from Glacier National Park, yet I’ve never found the time to experience its splendor. There always seems to be another half-dozen newly discovered esoteric texts beckoning to me.

The Attack on Obama

In the past few days the Nation of Islam has called attention to an attack on Barack Obama which has has revived interest in Martin Luther King historian David Garrow’s 2017 Obama biography, Rising Star, and deployed Garrow’s weapons in the former president’s direction.

It’s not an attempt to take Obama down, in any way similar to what’s being worked on Donald Trump. Rather, it’s intended to keep Mr. Obama in line, refresh his memory as to who is boss, and, if at all possible, cause him to grovel a bit more for the sake of the never-satisfied Cryptocracy, which requires of its vassals renewed evidence of servitude, even from one of its own stars. It’s the old Hollywood studio system arisen anew in politics.

Eunice G. Pollack works for the Jewish News Syndicate (JNS). On August 27 she penned a report, “Obama’s non-responses to black antisemitism.” She writes:

“In his 2017 book Rising Star: The Making of Barack Obama and a Tablet interview this month, historian David Garrow revealed that Obama refused to take a stand against black antisemitism in the late 1980s when, as a Loyola University professor put it at the time, ‘virulent antisemitism has gripped Chicago’s black community.’ Andrew Greeley, a Chicago priest and author, warned, ‘If I were Jewish, I would be terrified.”

In the Tablet report (“The Obama Factor: A Q&A with historian David Garrow”), interviewer David Samuels opines that it was not “Obama’s Blackness that bothered his girlfriend” (Sheila Miyoshi Jager, his lover in the 1980s), but that “he would not condemn antisemitism,” i.e. “a series of lectures organized by Louis Farrakhan’s Nation of Islam,” in connection with the mayoral candidacy of Chicago activist Steve Cokely.

“While acknowledging that Obama’s embrace of a Black identity had created some degree of distance between the couple, she insisted that what upset her that day was Obama’s inability to condemn Cokely’s comments.”

Eunice G. Pollack: “In 1995, Obama attended and supported the NOI’s Million Man March, at which Farrakhan, by then the country’s leading antisemite, delivered his two-hour ‘coronation address.'…Notably, the March was held not long after the NOI published—and distributed to students—the anonymous 1991 screed The Secret Relationship Between Blacks and Jews. The book attributed ‘monumental culpability’ for the Atlantic slave trade to Jews—a monumental lie. As the eminent historian David Brion Davis concluded, Jews had only a ‘very marginal place’ in the slave trade. Again, Obama was silent.”

The word obtuse is over-used yet I can’t think of any more appropriate term for the preceding undistinguished put-down. Dr. Pollack is preaching to the choir. No fair-minded person is going to be persuaded by her prescriptive directive for dismissing the authentic history of the Judaic role in the black slave trade. Most of us react poorly to commands to obey and believe on flimsy grounds. Reasonable people require more. (This writer’s review of The Secret Relationship Between Blacks and Jews is here).

The recent criticism of Obama turns on the idea that he “didn’t do enough” to condemn fellow blacks implicated in alleged hatred of Judaic people. The Neoconservative magazine Tablet made this charge in the course of its increasing participation in Conservative protests of cancel culture and censorship. Tablet’s position has been enhanced of late by various social-media Right wingers, particularly on X (Twitter).

The Neocon infiltration of the mostly Christian Conservative movement is a serious challenge. Tablet doesn’t mention that for many years up to and including the present, the Necon movement has been instrumental in enacting or advocating cancel cultural interdictions against Min. Farrakhan, The Secret Relationship history (insultingly banned by Amazon during Black History Month, 2019), many Palestinian voices, and revisionists like this writer.

This an issue which the Populist-Conservative movement has avoided. Ben Shapiro, Yoram Hazony (“Israeli-American Bible scholar,” president of Jerusalem’s Herzl Institute and chairman of the Edmund Burke Foundation), and Tablet magazine, are enthusiastically welcomed into the Free Speech movement despite the fact that they are opposed to certain types of expression, similar to their intellectual adversaries on the woke Left.

Mr. Shapiro has concocted a crazy-quilt alliance between the ferocious hate-Jesus injunctions in the Talmud, which he venerates, and Christianity. The double-minded man is unstable in all his ways (James 1:8), and Shapiro’s new spin on the ancient prisca theologia scam is headed over a cliff—only it will be the gullible Churchians who will crash and burn, not Mr. Shapiro, who is suppressing knowledge of the hate speech in the sacred books of the Talmud Bavli, Mishneh Torah and Shulchan Aruch. He knows what he’s doing. His naive followers do not.

The partisans of Zionism and Talmudism call out Obama on what they imagine to be his neglect of a solemn duty. He has “failed to condemn” anti-Semitism. As intolerant nationalists who defend their turf at the slightest sign of dissent, or intrusion on their cherished dogmas, they insist on the obligation of Obama (and everyone else) to expose and renounce the leaders they oppose.

The Neglected Moral Obligation to Condemn Anti-Gentilism

Might it be permissible at this juncture to ask a question? If so, allow me to ask, is turnabout fair play? In other words, is there an equally pressing moral obligation for white leaders to condemn anti-Gentilism? The term doesn’t have the scientific ring of the anti-Semitism taxonomy, but it is an accurate description, in its own homely fashion, of a persistent form of pernicious bigotry.

The government of the “state of Israel” has in its highest circles of power and authority proponents of the genocide and dispossession of the Palestinian people. These Judaic supremacists include Israeli Finance Minister Bezalel Smotrich. He advocates “pogroms” against Palestinian villages, calling for one such village to be “erased." He did so in the wake of a particularly murderous attack by Talmudic settlers on just such an Arab town.

Another extremist racist Israeli official is National Security Minister Itamar Ben-Gvir, head of the “Jewish Power Party” (yes, that is its name). He is a votary of mass murderer Baruch Goldstein who slaughtered 40 Palestianians (not 29 as reported by the captured press). For years Ben-Gvir kept a portrait of Goldstein in a place of honor in his home. Have we all “done enough” to alert the world to the heinous behavior of these deplorables?

Ovadia Yosef

Until recently the Sephardic chief rabbi in the Israeli state was Ovadia Yosef, who openly preached bigotry, racism and incitement. Yosef, the “Torah sage” of the extremist Israeli political party Shas, died at age 93. Isabel Kershner, foreign correspondent for the New York Times gushed:

“Rabbi Ovadia Yosef, a fiery figure in Israeli politics who, as the spiritual leader of the ultra-Orthodox Shas Party, fought for the interests of Jews of Middle Eastern and North African origin, died Monday in Jerusalem...Clad in his distinctive uniform of turban, gold-embroidered robe and dark glasses, Rabbi Yosef embodied a particular blend of religion, tradition, populism and ethnicity. As the leader of a Sephardic council of Torah sages that founded Shas in the early 1980s, he harnessed the underdog sentiment of many non-European Israeli Jews, restored their pride and turned them into a potent political force... Awarded the prestigious Israel Prize in 1970 for Torah literature, he wrote Talmudic commentaries and volumes of answers to questions on religious law.”

The October 7, 2014 Associated Press obituary: “Rabbi Ovadia Yosef, the religious scholar and spiritual leader of Israel's Sephardic Jews who transformed his downtrodden community of immigrants from North Africa and Arab nations and their descendants into a powerful force in Israeli politics, died on Monday... Yosef was often called the outstanding Sephardic rabbinical authority of the century. His prominence helped boost the confidence of his community, which makes up roughly half of Israel's population...”

The New York Times informs us that Rabbi Yosef stood for the “underdog” and restored the pride of “non-European Israeli Jews.”

The AP proclaimed that he “transformed his downtrodden community” and was “the outstanding Sephardic rabbinical authority of the century.”

Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahu heaped lavish praise on Rabbi Yosef as “one of the great halachic authorities of our generation. Rav Ovadia was a giant in Torah and halacha (Talmudic law) and a spiritual leader for tens of thousands," Netanyahu said. "He worked hard to glorify the heritage of Israel.”

While Louis Farrakhan and others like him are hounded for the rest of their lives by any comment about “Jews” or Judaism seen to be derogatory, one would never know from reading these media love notes disguised as journalism, that Rabbi Ovadia Yosef was anything other than a humanitarian campaigner for the “underdog” and the “downtrodden,” as well as a brilliant scholar.

What the hypocrites in the establishment media have concealed is that:

Rabbi Ovadia Yosef hated women.

He hated gentiles.

He hated Judaics who rejected the Talmud.

He called publicly for the extermination of the Palestinians.

He didn’t hate all gentiles, however. Rabbi Ovadia made an exception for Adolf Hitler who he claimed visited heavenly retribution on Judaics who had rejected Talmudism.

When he wasn’t busy fabricating magic amulets to give to Israeli voters who promised to vote for his Shas political party, Ovadia’s Kabbalism revealed to him that the liberal Judaics who were killed by Hitler’s armed forces were “reincarnated sinners” and for that reason the rabbi declared Hitler to be an avenging angel sent by heaven. This is apparently how Ovadia Yosef “glorified” the “heritage of Israel.”

The New York Times, the Associated Press and the rest of the corporate media have accorded widespread publicity to stories of Muslim clerics and heads of state in the Middle East allegedly referring to Judaic people as “pigs and dogs.” But when an “illustrious” Israeli rabbi’s career is examined after his death — a career dedicated to denigrating women, Palestinians, gentiles and even his own people if they rejected the Babylonian Talmud, there is hardly a whisper about the teachings of this hate monger, which he imparted to the Sephardic nation in the Israeli state, and to Judaics around the world via satellite broadcasts.

Yosef’s Hate Speech

Women are equivalent to dogs and pigs:

"A man must take care not to walk between two women or between two dogs or two pigs, and men should also not allow a woman or a dog or a pig to walk between them.”

— Sermon, 2006. cf. Haaretz, Dec. 30, 2011

Judaic persons killed by Hitler were reincarnated sinners:

“An eminent rabbi who heads Israel's third biggest political party sparked an uproar in Israel for saying that 6 million Jews perished in the Holocaust because they were reincarnations of sinners. Rabbi Ovadia Yosef was speaking in his weekly Saturday night sermon that is broadcast over the party’s radio stations and is beamed overseas by satellite.

"He said the six million Holocaust victims ‘were reincarnations of the souls of sinners, people who transgressed and did all sorts of things that should not be done. They had been reincarnated in order to atone.’ [Associated Press, Aug. 6, 2000].

Yehoshua Mashav told Israel Radio that “in plain language (Rabbi) Yosef was saying that Hitler...‘was simply the messenger of God sent to give the Jewish people their just desserts.”— The Independent (UK), August 6, 2000

Ovadia opines that Arab people should be exterminated:

“May the Holy Name visit retribution on the Arab heads, and cause their seed to be lost, and annihilate them. It is forbidden to have pity on them. We must give them missiles with relish, annihilate them. Evil ones, damnable ones.”

2001 Passover sermon. Cf. Haaretz, April 12, 2001

Gentiles likened to donkeys:

“Goyim were born only to serve us. Without that, they have no place in the world – only to serve the People of Israel...With gentiles, it will be like any person – they need to die, but [God] will give them longevity. Why? Imagine that one’s donkey would die, they’d lose their money. This is his servant... That’s why he gets a long life, to work well for this Jew. Why are gentiles needed? They will work, they will plow, they will reap. We will sit like an effendi and eat. That is why gentiles were created.”

—Jerusalem Post, October 18, 2010

According to the Times of Israel, “Ovadia was laid to rest in the Jerusalem neighborhood of Sanhedria, with some 800,000 mourners converging from all over the country to attend what became the largest funeral in Israeli history.”

An estimated 800,000 Israelis turned out to help Israeli leaders encourage and sponsor the memory of the rabbi who called for the extermination of the Arab people. It’s mostly forgotten today; simply not an issue.

Where are the traducers of Obama and Farrakhan when it comes to the ugly racism of Rabbi Ovadia Yosef? Where were they when the august, progressive New York Times published a lavish encomium for this raving bigot who conveyed his hate speech to millions?

Consider the ideology that possesses the sense of entitlement to judge every other tradition and declare them wanting, but permits no judgments on the sacred precincts of its own jealously guarded tradition.

Why are white elitists in the media permitted to issue the harshest possible judgment on Louis Farrakhan while publishing in their acclaimed newspapers of record-and-rectitude, the highest admiration for some of the most noxious, blood-drenched hate mongers on the planet?

Where are the righteous Judaic voices to say, ”This double standard does not represent me.” We need to hear from them. Sentiments like that are an effective defense of Judaic people against anti-Semitism.

We should be aware of the extent to which the populist anger of American gentiles toward the Washington D.C. ruling class is being appropriated and commandeered by Zionist partisans who consider Palestinian civilians little more than subhuman (nefesh-deficient) interlopers, who deserve to be driven off their ancestral lands and killed if necessary.

From Hate Speech to Terrorism

“Jewish terrorism is the result of the development of a specific settler counterculture, arising over the last 20 years out of the lore of specific extremist rabbis: Yitzchak Ginsburgh and Dov Lior.” (cf. Tomer Persico, “Neo-Hasidic Revival: Expressivist Uses of Traditional Lore”, Modern Judaism, 34(3), 2014, 278-308).

The Kabbalist Rabbi “Ginsburgh’s lore, translated into action on the hills of Judea and Samaria, ameliorates an old tension, accentuated severely in modern times, between adherence to our feelings and compliance with heteronomous halakhah: his (Israeli) hilltop adherents are given license to express their basest urges as religio-nationalist violence. Such ‘natural’ violence is not only considered kosher, but is regarded as a climactic religious revelation, with the added benefit of reenforcing their Jewish identity, as its religious significance derives solely from the fact that they are Jews, and as such, can express an inner divine reality through these acts of uninhibited, wild, ‘natural’ violence. As one member of these circles put it, ‘for some, being an authentic Jew is attacking an Arab village; for others, it is composing a new Hasidic poem about love.’ Spontaneous violence against non-Jews is therefore sanctified and considered among the most profound of religious acts.” [Cf. Tomer Persico, Research Fellow of the Shalom Hartman Institute, “A Natural Act of Vengeance: Settler Violence and Two Types of Jewish Fundamentalism,” Sources: A Journal of Jewish Ideas, Fall, 2023)

Can it be truly said that terrorist oppressors like these, who are fully immunized by the racist Israeli government, are our allies in our struggle for freedom against centralized tyranny in America?

While denouncing Louis Farrakhan and the alleged non-action of Barack Obama are made into major tests of one’s virtue, thousands of Palestinians murdered over the years as a result of Israeli theological racism is not an issue requiring us to commit to public declarations of our abhorrence.

Thus, the theological root of Israeli terrorism is not a cause for concern or a subject of protest or study among the supposed “Edmund Burke” Necons who promote the chimera of a Christian-friendly Talmudism that aspires to be a key Conservative ally in the revival of western civilization. An “alliance” like that is predicated on ignorance so abysmal it’s disgusting.

In the doctrine of Talmudism, western civilization is despised as “the empire of the damned and insolent nation” (kochi ve’otzem yadi of Edom). Historically its success is greeted as a calamity. This detestation is seen in connection with the rituals of “Tisha B’Av” ( תִּשְׁעָה בְּאָב ).

For example, the western triumph of landing an American gentile on the moon was regarded by Talmudism as one such disaster for their weltanschauung (cf. Hamodia, 26 Adar 5763 [February 28, 2003]). These and other smothered facts are in the 1100 pages of my banned textbook Judaism Discovered, the suppression of which is not exactly a cause célèbre for the Neocon paladins of free speech, or their camp-followers in the “anti-woke” Right wing.

The Talmudic-Kabbalistic gnosis has never forgiven Europe and European-descended people for having contained the agency of their sacred texts. This containment prevailed from the time of Constantine to the end of the Middle Ages, and it led to the ritual cursing of Christians in the Birkat Haminim Amidah prayer, the content of which is heavily disputed using a type of pilpul, convoluted casuistry that is supposed to lend verisimilitude to the denials that the prayer is a malediction hurled at Christians. We deconstructed the pilpul sophistry and documented the actual hate speech contained in Birkat Haminim. The evidence is on pp. 266-275 of The Occult Renaissance Church of Rome.

One of the most dangerous thoughts that can be articulated, which will rapidly cause the one who voices those thoughts to be canceled faster than you can say woke, must be aired. Here goes:

The post-modern movement to cancel books and their authors is seldom dated and traced to its authentic root. This may due to the fact that it began with the near total removal of Holocaust denial books from the free marketplace of ideas. Amazon alone removed hundreds of titles after selling them for years. Listen closely and you won’t hear a word of protest from Conservative First Amendment campaigners concerning this forgotten fact. The forces behind that mass censorship are still in place. In fact, they are more entrenched than ever.

Furthermore, Ben Shapiro, your “fellow free speech crusader,” has energetically protested the presence of Louis Farrakhan on Facebook. He considers it an affront to his sense of who has the right to speak on social media.

Equally laughable is the fact that while she was at the New York Times, Bari Weiss, currently the doyen of the anti-woke movement, assiduously worked for the silencing of Palestinian views.

Weiss has had nothing to say in defense of academics like the distinguished Dr. Norman Finkelstein whose struggle for Palestinian rights has cost him his university career.

Within the Right’s narrow and artificially constricted definition of cancel culture, the ban on Finkelstein and the Nation of Islam’s magisterial history trilogy, The Secret Relationship of Blacks and Jews, are irrelevant and not subject to discussion or debate.

Censorship doth ever prosper

Those who shout loudest about their books and ideas being canceled approve of the cancelation of the forbidden authors of the aforementioned literature. Consequently, the most banned books in America are by authors you never heard of. Censorship doth ever prosper, for if it prosper none dare call it censorship. It’s largely invisible. Therein rests its power.

The Populist, Conservative and Christian nationalist movements are badly compromised by the double-minded philosophy that is working to misdirect them. The racist tyranny represented by Talmudic hate speech and the homicidal Zionist dispossession of the Palestinians, cannot coexist within a movement purportedly dedicated to freedom from bigotry, censorship and government oppression.

I call on Robert F. Kennedy Jr., Matt Walsh, Jason Whitlock, Matt Taibbi, Tucker Carlson, Sen. Tim Scott, Christopher F. Rufo and all people of good will in media and government, to work for the Kingship of Christ, which precludes being unequally yoked to those for whom the claims of Jesus to be the Son of God and the Messiah of Israel, are anathema.

I warn you however, that the preceding defense of Christ’s Kingship will be worse than useless if it is not done in the love commanded by Jesus:

“You have heard that it was said, ‘You shall love your neighbor and hate your enemy.’ But I say to you, love your enemies, bless those who curse you, do good to those who hate you, and pray for those who spitefully use you and persecute you, that you may be sons of your Father in heaven.” (Matthew 5: 43-45).

Many people in the patriot movement claim to love Jesus. It’s a cheap claim if it isn’t actually lived. To be yoked to alleged “Christians” who say they love him and do not, is a disaster far worse than any other form of unequal yoking.

How can we know whether someone loves Him? Jesus gave us the criterion:

“If you love me, keep my commandments.” (John 14:15).

Copyright ©2023 by Independent History and Research

For the Advancement of Knowledge Contra Cancel Culture

We are grateful to the paid subscribers to “Michael Hoffman’s Revelation of the Method.” You make our controversial research and dissent possible. Thank you.

Michael Hoffman, a former reporter for the New York bureau of the Associated Press, is the author of Secret Societies and Psychological Warfare (2001), a textbook: Judaism Discovered (2008), The Occult Renaissance Church of Rome (2017), Twilight Language (2021) and six other books. His books have been translated into French and Japanese. He hosts the podcast, Michael Hoffman’s Revisionist History® and is at work on a book-length study of unfree labor in Britain and colonial America. Michael is an independent scholar free of corporate allegiance and university affiliation.