I mean Guyenot thinks that we imagined 200 years of the first millennium so I'm not surprised

Expand full comment
Feb 3Liked by Michael Hoffman

What an amazing paper. Thank you so much for taking the time to educate and enlighten us.

Seems like Guyenot, just like a myriad of others, keeps re-hashing the same old tired arguments.

Which begs the question, why do we people fall for such con jobs? From vitamins, religion, politics, to diets. We just seem to be very gullible as humans.

Expand full comment

I think Michael misses the significance of Guyenot's UNZ article. I believe Guyenot was writing science fiction.

Expand full comment

Michael I respect your research and hard work in Exposing Truth. However how do you miss that the "god" Demiurge who the Old Testament is mostly a damning Biography of is a Psychotic, Mass Murdering, Ethnic Cleansing, Child Sacrificer, Corporeal Being(s)? I have known this for 40 years and did not need Guyenot to note it. The Genocide, Ethnic Cleansing, Mass Child Sacrificing, Apartheid by the Zionists are doing to the Palestinians follows their Father's ("god" of the Old Testament) PSYCHOPATHY.

The Catholic Church has been a Disaster for Humanity. Just consider: Crusades, Inquisitions, Mass Murder of non-Catholics, Wars, Infallible Psychotic Popes.

Expand full comment

This is very disappointing but demonstrates you are an Apologist for an obvious Psychotic Murderous "god". Satan takes his orders to hurt and cause mayhem from your "god" as clear in the Book of Job.

It is not hate it is obvious Truth which you obvious cannot take. There is plenty of academic and research points here-let's go at it?

Plus you are a censurer of someone who disagrees with you.

Expand full comment

The following note comes from "M," one of the leaders of modern Gnosticism in the western hemisphere. I don't have permission to name him therefore I will only quote what he wrote. My rejoinder follows.

Feb. 4 Gnostic leader M wrote:

"FYI. In Gnosticism Jehovah is distinct from Yahweh. Yahweh is a fallen initiate and head of the Black Lodge."

(End quote)

Dear M.

Jehovah is simply the English translation of the Hebrew name Yahweh (YHWH).

Yehoushua — Jesus’ Hebrew name — literally means “Yahweh saves.”

Hence, the very name the Gnostics assert is that of a black magician forms the name of our Savior.

The name Yahweh (YHWH) appears nearly 7,000 times in the Bible as the name of God.

"God said moreover to Moses, 'You shall tell the children of Israel, 'Yahweh, the God of your fathers, the God of Abraham, the God of Isaac, and the God of Jacob, has sent me to you. ' This is my name forever, and this is my memorial to all generations." (Exodus 3:13-15).

2 Chronicles 7:14: “...my people, which are called by my name…”

Adherents of Orthodox Talmudism are not called by His name, because in defiance of God’s command in the Bible, the Mishnah declared that “He who pronounces the divine Name as it is spelled out” has “no portion in the world to come.” (Mishnah Sanhedrin 10:1).

By the Pharisee-dominated late Second Temple period, the personal name of God was pronounced only once a year, by the high priest, on Yom Kippur.

In fidelity to this superstition, St. Jerome in translating the Latin Vulgate, substituted Dominus for Yahweh. The King James translators rendered Yahweh's Name “LORD” in upper case letters.

I have written a study, "Tetragrammaton Magic: The Suppression of Yahweh's Name in Christendom":


Expand full comment

This substack comments section nothing compared to the section on UNZ. See how the author is utterly torn up, failing to note the numerous problems in the Dr. Unz's article, and furthermore, skirting around Dr. Guyenot's basic point--that the God of the Old Testament is not compatible with the Jesus. If Hoffman had read any of his books he'd know this. Instead he appears to be pulling a "Dr. E Michael Jones" and just launching an attack on his "adversary" without reading their works. This article makes Hoffman seem foolish and avoidant of the real discussion.

This incompatibility was noted first perhaps by Marcion, but he certainly isn't the only one. Basically any decent person will notice this as well if they ever read the Old Testament like a book--and not just the parts recited in liturgies or referred to in the New Testament. If they are the same God it needs to be admitted that we have divine schizophrenia. Commanding your chosen people to commit genocide of innocent infants is wrong, and one would think, utterly impossible for a Just Heavenly Father. Yet this is exactly what time and time again the God of the old testament commands "His People" to do.

Christianity's failure to address this issue is a root cause, I think, for the present genocide occurring in Gaza which would be impossible if Israel was not backed by the USA which contains many Zionist Christians. Hoffman's use of the No True Scotsman fallacy to deny this is extraordinary and unconvincing.

Expand full comment

Please, sir, you don’t know the difference between the oral Torah and the written Torah so all of this is going to be a mystery to you.

The Talmud is the oral Torah —the Torah sheBeal peh.

Expand full comment

" Hitler claimed the mantle of Nietzsche and Darwin and proclaimed a struggle for survival unhindered by “slave morality.” Hitler and his cabal then lost that struggle and went down to total defeat, with the German nation reduced to ashes. By Hitler’s own yardstick, his Nazis were, therefore, not as racially “fit” as their foes. "

Just today I said (out loud to myself) that "if Hitler were alive today" [with all the knowledge of what happened to Germany, Europe etc after the war, the aftermath (up to the support of jews, Israel, and wars in Iraq etc by millions of White Christians) of mass immigration into Europe, rape of Europe etc] "he would be on the side of the jew who proved the stronger" (as a biological organism or race). "No matter that there were many Germans and other Europeans who fought on the right side - they ultimately lost - BECAUSE the majority of that race fought against itself". I then said "and Nietzsche would agree with him."

Expand full comment

The lies about the Biblical Israel being the literal Jewish race was promulgated by the Rothschilds via the Scofield Bible in the 19th century. This is what spawned Christian Zionism in the 20th amongst evangelicals. The history behind this is beautifully analyzed in the following short video:


Expand full comment

Thank you so much for this article. I am in a struggle with other Zionist Christian’s about their belief of Israel being the “chosen” people and God’s covenant in the Old Testament as Israel right to the land. and he who blesses Isra will be blessed. You have given me much ammunition. I can’t believe how they love Israel while they kill the innocents!

Expand full comment

Douglas Reed's Controversy of Zion is the only book I have encountered that makes sense of the apparent incompatibility between the teaching of Jesus and what Christians call the Old Testament, which was compiled by Levitical scribes, not by Moses's hand (obviously as it contains an account of his death). This also explains why multiple accounts of an events occur throughout and they are seldom exactly alike. Basically the Levitical scribes, over decades, inserted nullifying rules upon the moral code given to Moses that effectively raise racial supremacy and domination of the chosen supreme over all other laws. It was precisely this that Jesus attacked in his teaching--almost word for word the refutation of the scribes code and fulfillment the true moral code provided by a heavenly creator (not a tribal war god)--and why the Pharisees the successors of these scribes murdered him. People should really read Mr. Reed's book which is online for free. https://controversyofzion.info/Controversybook/index.htm

Expand full comment