Invigorated by Battle: An Interview with Michael Hoffman

A conversation with the scholar of magic, mind control and the revisionist history of the occult conspiracy

Revisionist History Website

Interviewer: You have a radically different view of current events from most any dissenter—you see a complete breakdown of the human person, particularly in America, and the ability of that person to remember the crimes committed against them or their countrymen. You have hope for the future as well.

Michael Hoffman: The intent of the planned dissolution of what it means to be human is to induce in us a loss of hope. The further we are processed into dehumanization and bestialization the deeper we descend into hopelessness, which is followed by defeatism. To regain our humanity we should, as Ray Bresmer advised, “see what there is to celebrate even in the darkest penal hole.”

Interviewer:  We’re in the precinct of psychological warfare.

Hoffman: Psychological warfare in its fuller meaning encompasses the manipulation of sexual repression by Mesmeric techniques, neuro-linguistic programming through Twilight Language command words, and the repeated success of the Cryptocracy in accomplishing extraordinary feats of criminal enterprise without prosecution, conviction or punishment.

In this Revelation of the Method era the people are allowed to become aware of what has been done to them; less is kept secret. They’re processed to gain the knowledge of their victimization. And when they fail to act meaningfully to campaign to bring the perpetrators to justice they are processed a second time. Their indifference or impotence in the face of the revelations is a major hit on their psyche and dignity. They sink further into numbness and a form of low self esteem that blinds them to their nobility as God’s image-bearing creatures.

Interviewer: You trace America’s head-spinning cultural and transformative sexual revolution to texts and methods put into play by the Rosicrucian Brotherhood 400 years ago. Can you prove it?

Hoffman: If there remains a reading public beyond a tiny sub-set of researchers, then I can give evidence of it. But what segment of the American population reads deeply and at length any more? I’m not alluding to romance novels.

Members of the conspiracy theory fraternity who contact me are seldom recommending that I read Finkelstein’s Gaza: An Inquest into Its Martyrdom, or Pappe’s A History of Modern Palestine, or State of Terror by Thomas Suarez. Rather they are advising I watch a “must-see, blockbuster video about the Israeli war on Palestine.”

In the realm of the occult they recommend “films streaming online” rather than the 670 pages of Meditations on the Tarot: A Journey into Christian Hermeticism, or the 408 pages of John Opsopaus’ of The Secret Texts of Hellenic Polytheism: A Practical Guide to the Restored Pagan Religion of George Gemistos Plethon (which confirms one of the central theses of The Occult Renaissance Church Rome); or even the 344 pages of Plato’s Persona by Denis J.J. Robichaud.

In every category of criminology and historiography the visual now takes precedence over the printed page among “truth campaigners” who claim to be part of the solution. If all of the visual material were first rate (a tiny handful of the films are indeed instructive), then an argument could be made for those videos being a necessary part of our education, rather than cheap escapism. The sharpest analysts and investigators I’ve encountered are mostly all deep readers capable of sustained concentration on texts.

Most of the conspiracy videos I have sat through as recommended to me are clickbait by “activists” one level above what James Shelby Downard termed “huckster witches.” The people selling us on their aversion to the Establishment and predictions of the Next Big war, apocalypse or “bombshell revelation,” are often shady characters or even outright crooks and con-men whose buncombe would be more obvious if it were written down and is less transparent when accompanied by a stream of visually seductive images not that different in occult technique from what the Cryptocracy peddles. Study the Cass Sunstein factor in evaluating these distractions and dead ends.

Interviewer: You’ve emphasized that some conspiracy theories represent covert ops associated with former Obama official Sunstein.

Hoffman: As Ron Unz observes: “…establishment forces may easily take advantage of such psychological weaknesses…the late Michael Collins Piper, a leading conspiracy-researcher, strongly suspected that many of the implausible conspiratorial theories he considered so damaging to his cause may have been seeded and promoted by pro-establishment operatives engaging in Cass Sunstein-type deceptions, protecting official lies by manipulating excitable activists into discrediting their entire community.

“This situation has played out on our own website. Last September we published a long 9/11 article by Laurent Guyénot, who has produced a series of useful and important works on that topic over the last decade. However, his latest piece drew upon very thin evidence to argue that the simultaneous attacks on the World Trade Center and the Pentagon had actually been organized by entirely different groups of conspirators for entirely different reasons.

“I was even more dismayed to see him suggest that no actual planes had been hijacked nor had hit the World Trade Center, claims that I regarded with extreme skepticism. Unfortunately, this No Planes Hypothesis dominated much of the resulting discussion in the comments, which easily exceeded a half-million words. As it happens, I recently came across a short video taken by a visitor to New York City who was filming the first tower as it burned and then captured the second plane as it hit. The street scene and all the other details seem totally authentic to me and I would hope that the partisans of the No Planes Hypothesis will watch it and abandon their mistaken theories but I doubt that almost any of them will do so.

“Similarly, several weeks ago we published an article by Mark H. Gaffney. The first half of his presentation did a fine job of summarizing the implausibility of the official 9/11 narrative and described some of the strong evidence that military-grade explosives had been used to destroy the two towers in NYC.

“But in the second half, he then promoted the theory that the World Trade Center attacks had also involved fission-fusion nuclear blasts, a hypothesis I consider extremely implausible given the lack of any detectable radiation or noticeable large-scale explosions, and a longtime commenter who is a Stanford Physics Ph.D. was even more scathing in his criticism. Unfortunately, I have heard that this nuclear 9/11 theory has gradually become popular within some influential conservative and anti-establishment circles, and I wonder whether it has not been deliberately promoted by those who seek to make 9/11 Truthers look ridiculous” (end quote from Mr. Unz; italics added).

Interviewer: It seems Sunstein’s succeeded. Like the Sandy Hook denial which destroyed the operations of Alex Jones.

Hoffman: Here’s the line they seed: flat earth; no one died at Sandy Hook; Jeffrey Epstein was not actually assassinated; no one was killed in Uvalde, or at the Nashville Christian school, all the victims were “crisis actors.”

The useful idiots who promote that stuff may be so decayed in mind and spirit that Sunstein & hoc genus omne need not be involved or responsible. Watching the Zapurder film repeatedly slayed the mind of Freddy Prinze well before he put a gun to his head. As I wrote in Twilight Language most conspiracy theory is worse than useless. Many conspiracy theorists are among the most alchemically processed of all people. Ironic is too light a word to describe the perversity — the sad, pitiable tragedy of the processing of the anti-processors.

We’re focused too much on tactics and the misdirection that continues to frame the reaction to the occult Cryptocracy. We are little interested in origins. The Cryptocracy would not have been possible without the publication of four Rosicrucian texts issued in rapid succession, 1614-1617: