23 Comments

Exceptionally fascinating interview Michael - thank you for posting. May I ask which version of the Bible you consider most true to the Word? I feel like I've seen you mention the 1611 King James Bible previously but I thought I'd clarify first. Will look forward to your next book on the War on Working Class Whites.

Expand full comment

Very interesting. I appreciate the hopefulness that accompanies the encouragement of continuing to fight a righteous battle not yet lost and perhaps won't be for a long while. That would be nice.

Who led the Q&A in this interview? Is it a real person or a self-conducted query/response?

Expand full comment
Sep 20, 2023·edited Sep 20, 2023

Michael, your self-conducted interview device is ingenious, innovative and insightful. Your posts, especially the last two, comprehensively explicate your positions and are better than any university education on the subjects of those posts.

You rightly state that their have been setbacks for the cryptocracy and that we should be invigorated for battle. But in a twitter (X) post you compared Jack Smith to Stalin's Soviet prosecutor Andrey Vyshinsky and Robespierre. Having read Victor Sebestyen's excellent and magisterial "Lenin" (1-see note), I conclude that there is no way you can compare anyone connected to the Biden administration to early Soviet times (not yet, anyway, and hopefully never.)

In Vince Palamara's "Honest Answers" about the JFK assassination, former secret service agents speak of JFK's numerous and very public sexual "trysts". I find it funny that you write "The millions of fathers who stay loyal to their wives..." right after mentioning JFK.

The "...This day you will be with me in paradise” quote of Jesus leads me to wish you will do a future post on Bento/Benedictus Spinoza's (and Albert Einstein's) theological views. (See the book "Spinoza" by Steven Nadler.) (2-see note).

Finally, you wrote "Church Provan", instead of "Charles Provan" or "church scholar Charles Provan".

1-Sebestyan's "Lenin" covers everything about Lenin until Lenin's death in January 1924 and the cult surrounding Lenin's embalmed corpse. Thus, the book does not have information about Vyshinsky's career. ((A future cult concerning Biden's corpse would be redundant). Sebestyan gives all the names and information about everyone involved in the murders of Tsar Nicholas II and his family, but he lets the reader draw the conclusions as to the ethnicities of those behind the planning, coordination and management of the murders, so as not to be accused of "anti-Semitism".

2-Steven Nadler's "Spinoza" is excellent, except it has absolutely nothing on the enslavement of Africans that some Sephardic Judaics of Amsterdam, Portugal, Brazil and the Netherlands Antilles were so heavily involved in. It would have been interesting to know Spinoza's views on the slave trade.

Expand full comment

Hi Mr. Hoffman, you said in this great interview that "freemasons were involved in campaigning for Pius IX’s promulgation of papal “infallibility.” I was wondering if you believe the dogma was then invalid, or do you still consider it a valid dogma, though with this bad influence behind it? Thanks for all your work.

Expand full comment

Bravo! So proudly you hit the bullseye onto what is left of man. Wonderful, and much needed for me.

How many times do the Bible scriptures tell us to be not afraid?

https://www.openbible.info/topics/dont_be_afraid

Expand full comment

In your last newsletter (Issue 3 Autumn 2023), page 7, you stated: "Two books, "The Occult Renaissance Church of Rome" and "Usury in Christendom, The Mortal sin that Was an Now is Not", are the keys to unraveling this mystery of iniquity". I've read these books two times and many sections multiple times. I continue to read them and each time more is revealed. Truth really is beautiful to behold. Thank you Michael.

Expand full comment
author

—Michael— I so wanted to post this comment, and have thought I went through the hoops, but it won’t post!! Sometimes certain questions seem terribly urgent! We are in such times, and if there is to be a breakthrough of the soul, I feel it will come from your work! Thank you—Kate

KATE's COMMENT:

Concerning “absolute obedience to the papacy” and the “process of usurpation”: now, of course, we have absolute obedience to The Science. Isaac Newton—I wonder whether it is generally known that he hid a chest filled with the writings of Hermeticism in the attics of the Royal Society, discovered by John Maynard Keynes, another great hoodwinker, early in the 20th c. (Revealed on purpose?)

Occultism lies at the heart of our (lying) science, and medicine—the pharmakos—ruled by big pharma and the money power...

And speaking of usurpations in our language and thoughts: what has happened to the soul to soul conversations we used to have with each other, family and friends, replaced now by slogans, fixed ideas, legalisms, psychologisms, within the ever-changing p.c. All the “predictive speech” and command words, the neurolinguistic programming, because instead of souls now we have nervous systems.

These are just a woman’s wonderings as I wander through the fields of explosive thought given to us by Michael Hoffman’s extraordinary work. To quote Nadezhda Mandelstam, whose poet husband was liquidated by Stalin for his free use of language, “we are not woodchips on a rushing stream.” We are still human beings, if we can but just learn to read what Michael puts before us, by the grace of God.

Expand full comment
Sep 25, 2023·edited Sep 25, 2023

Dear Mr. Hoffman,

In the link below is an article where a mass shooting survivor claims to have been shot in the back 7 times with an AR 15 firing .223 cal. high velocity rounds. He then scaled a fence and ran for safety. The claim is patently ridiculous. There are other equally preposterous claims in other spectacular crimes you write about. I find it worrisome that you appear to accept stories such as the one I link to below at face value.

Col. Fletcher Prouty in chapter 3 of his book JFK: The CIA, Vietnam, and the Plot to Assassinate John F. Kennedy (available online at archive.org) goes into detail how the intelligence services stage fake terror attacks and fake shootings as Psychological Operations (PSYOPs) in Psychological Warfare. Indeed, he states the bulk of the Cold War consisted of both sides using just such operations on a daily basis with news outlets dutifully reporting them as fact. Are the intelligence agencies no longer using PSYOPs in pursuit of their objectives?

With all due respect, sir, I do not know what to conclude regarding your apparent gullibility in this matter.

Cordially,

Willard

https://www.wcnc.com/article/news/crime/club-q-lgbt-shooting-colorado-update-charlote-native-wounded/275-20b649ce-01cf-4adf-b702-86a70f86feca

Expand full comment

SACRED NAME OF GOD? or BLASPHEMY? https://remnantradio.org/Archives/articles/sacred_name.htm

Interviewing Deprogrammers: In the House of the Strong Man Sodomy is the Key

http://www.whale.to/b/knox1.html

Expand full comment