Should the Palestinians Continue to Engage in Armed Resistance to Save the Lives of their Women and Children?
A Contrarian Christian View
Should the Palestinians and Lebanese continue to engage in armed resistance to save the lives of their women and children from indiscriminate Israeli bombing and massacres?
The short (and highly controversial) answer is, “No.”
The Cryptocracy, whether in its Israeli or US government iterations, loves violence. I can’t emphasize that truth enough. The Cryptrocracy aches with a burning desire for you to pick up that AR-15 and fire away at its idols and personnel.
One reason Minister Louis Farrakhan’s Nation of Islam has survived and flourished in the US, despite every dirty trick in the book being employed against it, is because the Nation did not take that bait. They are unarmed. They will box you or wrestle you or use judo to stop you from assaulting their families or the Minister, but their greatest weapon is moral suasion.
Heap scorn on it as you like, they are still here, in community, anchored by thousands of families, with attorneys and doctor and judges in their ranks (and a lawsuit underway against the ADL)—and enormous respect in the American black community at large.
I term the members of the Nation of Islam the “Black Mennonites,” because like the non-violent German-American religious denomination, their family values are stratospheric.
Go among them and the Cryptocracy-seeded image of the black man and woman as violence-prone, sex-obsessed, indolent burdens on society evaporate into the dustbin where white script-writing for black people belongs.
The Cryptocracy had encountered great difficulty in its goal of defeating the Nation of Islam. Their main hope is for Minister Farrakhan to pass from the scene and a traitor in the ranks ascend to leadership—that, and the usual silent treatment from the pres and the history book writers—for whom Mr. Farrakhan’s epochal October 16, 1995 Million Man March on Washington D.C. to instill family values. self-esteem and self-reliance, is a will-o’-the-wisp.
Another red letter date, January 6, 2021 was propelled by Mr. Trump’s reckless folly and a Cryptocracy that fueled the hoped-for attack on Capitol Hill by refusing to call out the National Guard to prevent or minimize it. The Cryptocracy wanted it. No, actually check that. The Cryptocracy lusted for it, and since then they have squeezed every last drop of benefit from Trump’s mob, who in point of fact, were little more than cast members acting a pre-determined part.
In nearly every organization, club or group infiltrated by the FBI, the informant can almost always be spotted by identifying the one who advocates bombings, shootings, abductions or carrying firearms and other weapons into volatile situations.
The meshuggenah Israelis are doing everything they can to incite the Palestinians to suicidal reprisal-violence. You may say, “Mr. Hoffman, retribution to correct wrongs is righteous!”
That may be the case in a nation of laws with an impartial media to weigh the cause, the crimes and the consequences of retaliation. The Palestinians have no government of laws. Hamas was invented by the Zionists.
The “Palestinian Authority” in the West Bank is a corrupt conglomeration of competing petty bourgeoisie capitalists. They are kapos policing a ghetto for their masters.
Some of the best of the Palestinians, the most moderate, decent and stalwart have been assassinated by the hundreds over the past 20 years by the Israeli army and secret police (Mossad and Shin Bet).
Furthermore, any retaliation for the Israeli murder of their women and children is viewed in the West as terrorism. When Israelis terror bomb it is not terror, it is justifiable retaliation. This is an inviolable formula—an impregnable media fortress behind which Zionist genocide has its way.
The “right to resist tyranny by any means” celebrated by the Allies of World War II in regard to Soviet partisan and Italian and French Resistance guerrilla attacks against Nazis, using bombs and indiscriminate killing of the Hitlerites in some cases, does not apply to the Palestinian resistance.
Due to the exalted status of their enemy, Palestinians cannot employ military means to defend their families from mass murder or achieve a nation state. All armed resistance to a community designated as holy, either by their suffering in the Second World War or their purported divinely appointed genetic superiority, cannot be met with force. Every such act becomes a mark against the Palestinians in the corporate media of the western world.
The first anniversary of the despicable Hamas terror attack on Israeli civilians of October 7 will soon be upon us. In the forthcoming commemorations the 50,000 Palestinians and 2,000 Lebanese slaughtered since then by the Israeli government will take a seat way out in the nose bleed section of the colosseum of commemoration.
If the Israeli military had killed a million Arabs in the past year it would not register in the annals of western war crime commemoration. The tragic deaths of those 1,200 Israelis on October 7 will become the signature atrocity in the West’s chronicle of Middle East terror.
Zionism cannot exist without the deaths of Judaic people. Those deaths are Zionism’s raison d’etre. They must die so Zionism can live—so that racial supremacy can prevail in a western world that has, at least officially, repudiated that doctrine and rendered it odious—with this one exception.
The enemy of Zionism is comity between people: Jerusalem as an open city of the three faiths—Jews and Arabs finding what there is to celebrate from out of the dark hole of warfare that has torn them asunder.
The Left’s knee-jerk phrase, “setttler-colonialism” has proved to be utterly inadequate as a means for decoding the prime factor sustaining Israeli genocide. It has peace activists running in circles of incomprehension, tied in knots of frustration endeavoring to grasp the root of the horror and that which maintains its momentum through oceans of Palestinian and Lebanese blood—the shedding of which is obligatory, business-as-usual.
Bloodshed, in the words of the Israeli leadership, is “The only language the Arabs know.” The Zionist leadership now consists of a greater assortment of racist ghouls than have ever presided over the bandit state.
Itamar Ben Gvir, Israel’s Minister of National Security, and Bezalel Smotrich, the nation’s finance minister, are two evil spirits for whom settler colonialism is a means to a mystical end.
Settler colonialism is a vehicle for achieving that which Talmudism-weaponized-by Zionism has engendered with the fanatical zealotry Ben Gvir and Smotrich personify, together with the terrorist “Hilltop Youth” of the settlements, who are entirely motivated by a perversion of the Talmud. This perversity is taught in yeshiviot headed by genocidal maniacs such as Rabbi Yitzhak Shapira whose influential book of commentary on Maimonides’ Mishneh Torah advocates the “preventive” killing of Palestinian children.
Nota bene that I stipulate the weaponization factor. Talmudism before it was subsumed by Zionism taught that Jews are forbidden to make war or establish a nation state until the coming of the Messiah; that was Talmudism’s sacred dogma for 1,600 years until it was subverted by Zionist ideology.
I understand that most Arabs are not Christians and that they believe Islam teaches they must fight oppressors by taking up arms. By way of rebuttal I would point out that when resistance to oppressors is suicidal and results in more death and defeat and ever more power to the tormentor, it is itself an extension of the oppression — the tyrants succeed in mentally colonizing their victims. The most colonized of those targeted comprise the ruling circles of Hezbollah and Hamas.
Economic boycotts and smuggled videos of Israeli war crimes should be the prime “weapons.” Marches, mass demonstrations and protests, the publication of diaries, memoirs, eyewitness histories and media outreach are the secondary means of “fighting” Israeli mass murder.
You cry out, “It has all been done before!”
So too has avenging violence been done before; most recently on October 7, 2023. What dividends has that crime paid the Palestinians? What dividends have the saber-rattling, machismo and pathetic, dinky rockets of Hezbollah done for the Lebanese? Hamas and Hezbollah hold the Palestinian and Lebanese masses hostage to their self-extinguishing violence.
Mahatma Gandhi conquered the British with perseverance—and he was no pacifist, by the way—as Norman G. Finkelstein demonstrated in his eponymous book. Gandhi chose pacifism (of a very courageous, walk-into-the-guns type), out of an astute analysis that violence would never win for the Indians the liberation they sought; not in his lifetime, at least.
I recognize I may not be able to convince all the victims of Israeli mass murder to abjure guns, bombs and vendettas lasting lifetimes. There are some among the Arabs who have a bloodlust like the Zionists. It is a form of demonic possession to which no human being is immune. I leave such people to God.
I remind all and sundry of a fact of realpolitik: the Israeli policy is to recruit future soldiers for Hamas and Hezbollah. The western media are not allowed to report from Gaza and they have displayed no great interest in doing so, or in remembering the more than one hundred reporters the Israelis have murdered since last October. Hence, we in the West cannot see the extent to which the elderly, the helpless and whole families of mothers, fathers, sisters and brothers have been butchered. Palestinian boys now age 8, 10, and 12 are surely brimming with fury at the sight of a slaughter which is calculated to lead them into the arms of Hamas or the other terror gang, Islamic Jihad, when they are old enough to take up arms.
Palestinians, by refusing the non-violent path, are cooperating with Zionism’s conspiracy to perpetuate the warfare into the next generation.
Some of the responsibility for this grim state of affairs rests with the Gulf State billionaires. Saudi Arabia’s ruler has sought investment opportunities in the fleshpots of the world and seeks to transform his own nation into a sybarite’s utopia, like Dubai. The extent to which these sordid scenes excite the contempt of the enemies of Islam cannot be overstated.
If Saudi business people had the dedication and vision of the Zionists they would have long ago formed partnerships with Arab-American U.S. citizens to create newspapers and purchase radio and television stations for the unbiased reporting of Middle Eastern news inside America.
Don’t bother countering my proposal with the White House crackdown on Russia’s RT social media. A newspaper has far more entrenched First Amendment protections than social media. So too does a television station broadcasting in a local market.
If those news enterprises had been in place under Arab-American ownership since the 1980s then American voters would have long ago turned off the taxpayer cash spigot which makes Israeli war Zionism possible.
Moreover, other nations such as the United Arab Emirates, Turkey, Morocco, Albania, Algeria, Pakistan, Indonesia, Kazakhstan, Bahrain, Malaysia and Tunisia can cut off all trade with the Israeli state and its NGO affiliates throughout the world. It’s a matter of ethics and life-saving rescue in preference to blood money and business affairs, as befits a faith founded by one of the world’s most aggressive campaigners against avarice and usury banking.
To whatever degree you may challenge or question the actions I have counseled, the fact is, God is in charge. The people of Palestine and Lebanon must rely on the Sovereign of the Universe and follow the example of Jesus Christ in defeating the iniquitous principalities and powers of our time.
After Minister Farrakhan learned that I was not Jewish but rather a Christian, he remarked, “Michael, if you are a Christian then you are a Muslim.”
I know it appears like a contradiction, yet the Nation of Islam is itself a sign of contradiction to the Muslim world—the black Islam which arose in America out of deep Christian roots in the black church.
The Nation consists of the most Bible-literate Muslims in the U.S. When Minister Farrakhan entered a Catholic Church in Chicago in 2019 to defend Mary, the Mother of Jesus, from Talmudic blasphemy, there was no controversy among the black Muslims about this act of chivalric nobility on his part. They knew their New Testament.
I am not endeavoring to paper over the real differences that exist between Christian and Muslim theology. I am sharing what my Christian-Arab friends and allies have related to me about life among Muslims and Christians prior to when the warping and disfiguring power of Zionism inflamed the communal differences which in earlier days had been met with civility and dialogue in Palestine.
To furnish an example, on the day set aside in the Christian Church to honor the Arab Saint George, on that day the Muslims of Palestine attended the local mosque and the Christians the church, and then met afterwards in the village square to have a party in honor of George.
Hostility between Christians and Palestinians today (and toward Christians in many Islamic nations), rests in the fact that many of these “Christians” do not recognize Orthodox and Catholic churches as being of Christ. In their eyes if it doesn’t resemble a fundamentalist Four Square edifice denuded of art works and stained glass, and if it doesn’t impart the theology of Dispensationalism, it does not qualify as a Christian church. Misnamed “Evangelical Christians” have gained a reputation throughout the world as agents of Israeli war-Zionism. When they are subsequently distrusted and mistreated they call it “persecution.”
Something similar is afoot on America’s college campuses. When students who support the Israeli genocide in Gaza are met with disgust by others on campus, the revulsion is termed “anti-Semitism.” The Israeli partisans then lobby Congress for laws to keep them safe from the abhorrence which support for any form genocide invariably generates.
I note too the West’s artists and entertainment moguls, from Taylor Swift to Lady Gaga, Madonna, Bruce Springsteen, Christopher Nolan, Martin Scorcese, Billie Eilish, Jeff Bridges, Bradley Cooper, Willie Nelson and a legion of other “stars” have greeted the Israeli mass murder with deafening silence.
These mutes are also found in the leadership of the corporate world. Elon Musk, for all his anti-censorship activism and cojones in defying the White House, knows full well that his activities in rocketry, satellites and the automobile industry would be severely, negatively affected if he were to speak up for those killed and wounded by Israeli bombings (I don’t use the cosmetic term “strikes”), that are paid for with tax revenue from Mr. and Mrs. Yokel in Peoria. Elon is reputed to be rich beyond the dreams of Midas, yet it would seem that he believes that his fabulous wealth can’t protect him from what might occur if he were to express disapprobation of Israeli mass murder.
It falls to this reporter to tell it as it is and take the consequences, without a money shield, or a hotshot lawyer, or earthly protection of much of any kind. Yet, I pity my enemies, because I come in the name of the Lord, which is not “LORD,” as the King James translators would have us believe.
Rather, it is His personal name of power. Churchianity has reserved its use by the occult in keeping with a Mishnaic superstition, Mishnah Sanhedrin 10: “These are the ones who have no portion in the World to Come…He who pronounces the Divine name as it is spelled out.”
Talmudists are not permitted to speak aloud Y-a-h-w-e-h. This is the grandaddy of the counterfeit, of substituting an imitation for what is authentic—in the case at hand in order to drain the power available to the believer while offering it to sorcerers.
The Word of God decrees in Psalm 118:26, “Blessed is He who comes in the name of Yahweh” (in English, “Jehovah”).
Yahweh’s name can’t be used in Churchianity because Churchianity, from Pope Benedict XVI on down, follows the Mishnah and the Gemara in falsifying the Word of God.
With reference to YHWH, when God disclosed Himself to Moses by way of the Tetragrammaton, He said, "זה שמי לעלם" —“This is My Name Forever" (Exodus 3:15).
The rabbis however, teach that the word "לעלם" is allegedly lacking a vav, which supposedly “implies” the word "לְעַלֵּם" — “This is My Name to conceal.”
The Talmud of Babylon (Pesachim 50a) concludes, in keeping with Mishnah Sanhedrin 10, that God’s personal name, which He placed 7,000 times in the Old Testament in order for it to be revealed and pronounced, should be concealed and unpronounced.
However, don’t despair. The Talmudic exegetes have provided a loophole: His name can be mentally “recalled” when using an anemic and meaningless substitute name (such as “Hashem”).
If intellectually dishonest, Bible-nullifying, casuistic lawyer’s games like the preceding appeal to you, then you are a good, unbigoted certified Churchian, entitled to a career, ample bank account and decent reputation in the media.
I am a sinner who fears YHWH and consequently I am not brave enough to violate His clear command for empowering His people by bringing forth knowledge in His Name.
I can’t defend myself with the money I don't possess, or the attorney I lack. What I can utilize to pluck myself out of those “traps” which the Cryptocracy lays for “troubadors” — what Mick Jagger in this connection described as “samba, that very hypnotic groove, which has a tremendous hypnotic power”—is the Word of God, the Power above all power, and I find it in Psalm 31:1-5.
Postscript: I am cognizant that these issues of divine nomenclature can be tedious to non-believers. For me they constitute the science of self-defense according to the instructions the Creator chose for His people on earth. Having, like Palestinians and the people of Lebanon, little defense other than the Almighty, I hope the agnostics among my readers will at least perceive that my resort to it is not without good reason, according to the faith which directs me.
Michael Hoffman
Copyright ©2024 by Independent History and Research • RevisionistHistory.org
FOR THE ADVANCEMENT OF KNOWLEDGE CONTRA CANCEL CULTURE
I am grateful to the paid subscribers who make these columns possible. Please give serious consideration to joining them. I will continue this Truth Mission for as long as I have the resources to do so. Securing those resources is a constant struggle. We have not yet obtained enough paid subscriptions to sustain the work required to produce this column weekly. Donations toward the support of my research, writing and broadcasting are gratefully received: P.O. Box 849, Coeur d’Alene, Idaho 83816—or at this link. Thank you.
Revisionist historian Michael Hoffman explicates the alchemical processing of humanity in his book, Twilight Language. He is the author of nine other volumes of history and literature including Secret Societies and Psychological Warfare, as well as Usury in Christendom, Judaism Discovered, The Occult Renaissance Church of Rome, and Adolf Hitler: Enemy of the German People.
Michael is a former reporter for the New York bureau of the Associated Press and a former paid consultant to the news department of the New York Times. His books have been published in translation in Japan and France. Listen to his broadcasts on his Revisionist History® podcast, and find him on X (Twitter). He resides with his family in Idaho.
Revisionist History® is registered with the United States Patent and Trademark Office as the trademark of Independent History and Research, Box 849, Coeur d’Alene, Idaho 83816. All Rights Reserved.
FOR FURTHER RESEARCH
Tetragrammaton Magic: The Substitution of Yahweh’s Name in Christendom and the Use of Yahweh's Name in the Ceremonial Sorcery of the Western Secret Societies
Judaism Discovered by Michael Hoffman (textbook, 1,102 pages)
In Lebanon and Gaza the Innocent Continue to be Perpetually Massacred
Dear Mr. Hoffman, Would you agree that it is inappropriate to use the King James Bible? I agree with what you said about the Holy name of Yahweh. Not that my opinion matters. But at the same time, has not Almighty Yahweh used the King James Bible to save many individual lives in the west? Also, I used listen to and appreciate the messages of Mr. Farrakhan until he started to refer to himself as Jesus Christ. Maybe I misunderstood him. But, with all due respect, it sounded like he claims to be the second coming of Jesus.
I also just realized that Naomi Wolfe has been curiously silent about the atrocities in Gaza since October 7th. I used to think that she was an open-minded humanitarian. But it seems like her mind has been influenced by the judeo-protestants that she has allied herself with recently. It seems like she has become more Talmudic as she has become more religious.